Skip to main content

Exploring Capacity for Strategic Policy Work: Water Policy in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policy Capacity and Governance

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

Abstract

Claims that policy capacity has been eroded in the world of new public management have been widely canvassed. Yet these conceptualizations of policy capacity have mainly been linked to traditional and rationalist views of the policy process, where the focus is on content expertise for understanding the issue, analytical skills for generating viable options, and exercising authority and autonomy to implement the chosen policy. A second discourse on perceived policy capacity decline raises deeper challenges in relation to strategic policy work such as comprehension of ‘wicked’ policy challenges, and the need for forward-thinking, collective effort and political alignment capabilities. What is the range of skills needed for envisioning and communicating this ‘policy-for-the-future,’ as opposed to designing and implementing ‘policy-of-the-day?’ This chapter draws together research on the urban water policy responses of Australian capital cities to prolonged drought, in order to explore the policy capacity required for innovative policy making. The drought circumstances heightened policy activities and provided an opportunity to identify the policy capacity which featured in the strategic policy responses of the period, alongside the perceived capacity gaps which contributed to a missed opportunity for policy innovation. The results suggest that capability within both individual and organizational levels of the policy setting is required to produce a reinforced architecture for facilitating major policy change. In particular, capacity for gaining legitimacy for long-term policy outlooks, addressing the politicization of issues, and facilitating/managing diverse policy communities emerged as key themes in strategic policy work. By examining policy capacity characteristics and deficits for policy innovation, the chapter makes a first attempt at identifying key aspects of what might constitute forward-looking policy capacity in contemporary government.​

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althaus, C., Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2013). The Australian policy handbook. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, P., & Bakvis, H. (2005). Public service reform and policy capacity: Recruiting and retaining the best and the brightest. In M. Painter & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, S., & Marsh, A. (2013). Reflections on contemporary debates in policy studies. Policy & Politics, 41(4), 643–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgon, J. (2008). The future of public service: A search for a new balance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(4), 390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Ashley, R., & Farrelly, M. (2011). Political and professional agency entrapment: An agenda for urban water research. Water Resources Management, 23(4), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Farrelly, M., & Keath, N. (2009). Practitioner perceptions of social and institutional barriers to advancing a diverse water source approach in Australia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 25(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch, H. K. (2005). Policy analysis, policy practice and political science. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(3), 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commissioner for Water Security. (2010). Water for good. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (2000). Conclusion: Policy capacity and the future of governance. In G. Davis & M. Keating (Eds.), The future of governance. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). From hierarchy to contracts and back again: Reforming the Australian public service. In M. Keating, J. Wanna & P. Weller (Eds.), Institutions on the edge? Capacity for governance. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daviter, F. (2015). The political use of knowledge in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 48(4), 491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Sustainability and Environment. (2004). Our water, our future. Melbourne: Government of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. (2009). Testing the discourse of declining policy capacity: Rail policy and the department of transport. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(3), 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallop, G. (2007). Strategic planning: Is it the new model. Public Administration Today, 10, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Queensland. (2000). Water act. Brisbane: Government of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Australia. (2004). Natural resoures management act. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2010). Water policy—Evidence, learning and the governance of uncertainty. Policy and Society, 29(2), 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2013). Evidence-based policymaking—Speaking truth to power? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(4), 397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2015). Policy analysis and public sector capacity. In B. W. Head & K. Crowley (Eds.), Policy analysis in Australia. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration and Society, 47(6), 711–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W., & O’Flynn, J. (2015). Australia: Building policy capacity for managing wicked policy problems. In A. Massey & K. Johnston (Eds.), The international handbook of public administration and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence‐based policy‐making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2016). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, E., & Tiernan, A. (2011). The Australian public service and policy advising: Meeting the challenges of 21st century governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(4), 437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., et al. (2008). Climate change—Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 319(5863), 573–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn, J., Vardon, S., Yeatman, A., & Carson, L. (2011). Perspectives on the capacity of the Australian public service and effective policy development and implementation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(3), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (2004). Unpacking policy capacity: Issues and themes. In M. Painter & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to state policy capacity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (2004). Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2004). Ministries and agencies: Steering, meddling, neglect and dependency. In M. Painter & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to state policy capacity. Basingstoke, U.K: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2011). Australia’s Urban water sector: Productivity commission inquiry report (Vol. 2). Melbourne: Productivity Commission, Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Water Commission. (2010). South East Queensland water strategy. Brisbane: Government of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quezada, G., Walton, A., & Sharma, A. (2016). Risks and tensions in water industry innovation: Understanding adoption of decentralised water systems from a socio-technical transitions perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. (2011). Studying governance: Policy as a window onto the modern state—Introduction. In C. Shore, S. Wright, & D. Però (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power (1st ed.). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearritt, P. (2008). The water crisis in Southeast Queensland: How desalination turned the region into carbon emission heaven. In P. N. Troy (Ed.), Troubled waters: Confronting the water crisis in Australia’s cities. Canberra: ANU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearritt, P., & Head, B. W. (2010). Water politics. In B. Gleeson & W. Steele (Eds.), A climate for growth. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiernan, A. (2015). Craft and capacity in the public service. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiernan, A., & Wanna, J. (2006). Competence, capacity, capability: Towards conceptual clarity in the discourse of declining policy skills. Govnet international conference. Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Cabinet Office. (1999). Professional policymaking for the twenty first century. London: UK Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veselý, A. (2013). Externalization of policy advice: Theory, methodology and evidence. Policy and Society, 32(3), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbeloff, L., & Brown, R. (2011). Security through diversity: Moving from rhetoric to practice. Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 64(4), 781–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Australia Planning Commission. (2008). Better urban water management. Perth: Department for Planning and Infrastructure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Water Corporation. (2009). Water forever. Perth: Western Australian Water Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

Case Study References

  • Bettini, Y., Brown, R. R., & de Haan, F. J. (2013). Water scarcity and institutional change: lessons in adaptive governance from the drought experience of Perth, Western Australia. Water Science and Technology, 67(10), 2160–2168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettini, Y., Rijke, J., Farrelly, M., & Brown, R. R. (2013). Connecting levels and disciplines: Connective capacity of institutions and actors explored. Chapter 7. In J. Edelenbos, N. Bressers, & P. Scholten (Eds.), Water governance as connective capacity. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. R., & Clarke, J. M. (2007, June). Transition to water sensitive urban design: The story of Melbourne, Australia. Melbourne: Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Farrelly, M., & Keath, N. (2009). Practitioner perceptions of social and institutional barriers to advancing a diverse water source approach in Australia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 25(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, B., & Wallington, T. (2010). Institutional arrangements for water management in South East Queensland. Brisbane: Urban Water Security Research Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2014). Managing urban water crises: Adaptive policy responses to drought and flood in Southeast Queensland. Ecology & Society, 19(2), 33. doi:10.5751/ES-06414-190233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2010). Water policy—Evidence, learning and the governance of uncertainty. Policy and Society, 29(2), 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., & McKay, J. (2010). The contribution of actors to achieving sustainability in Australia through water policy transitions. Chapter 10. In D. Huitema & S. Meijerink (Eds.), Water policy entrepreneurs: A research companion to water transitions around the globe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keath, N., & Brown, R. (2009). Extreme events: Being prepared for the pitfalls with progressing sustainable urban water management. Water Science and Technology, 59(7), 1271–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. (2013). Drought and its role in shaping water policy in Australia. Chapter 26. In K. Schwabe, J. Albiac, J. D. Connor, R. M. Hassan, & L. Meza González (Eds.), Drought in arid and semi-arid regions. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, V. G. (2006). Applying integrated urban water management concepts: A review of Australian experience. Environmental Management, 37(5), 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearritt, P. (2008). The water crisis in Southeast Queensland: How desalination turned the region into carbon emission heaven. In P. N. Troy (Ed.), Troubled waters: Confronting the water crisis in Australia’s cities. Canberra: ANU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Meene, S. J., Brown, R. R., & Farrelly, M. A. (2011). Towards understanding governance for sustainable urban water management. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1117–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallington, T. J., Robinson, C. J., & Head, B.W. (2010, August). Institutional capacity for sustainable and integrated urban water management: Interview results (Technical Report No. 22). Brisbane, Queensland: Urban water security alliance, CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvette Bettini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bettini, Y., Head, B.W. (2018). Exploring Capacity for Strategic Policy Work: Water Policy in Australia. In: Wu, X., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. (eds) Policy Capacity and Governance. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics