Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Systemic Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Decision Making

Part of the book series: Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ((TSRQ,volume 33))

  • 1936 Accesses

Abstract

As machine age problems have given way to systems age messes, the underlying complexity associated with understanding these situations has increased exponentially. Accordingly, the methods we use to address these situations must evolve as well. Unfortunately, however, many antiquated methods for dealing with situations remain prominent. The underlying paradigm for solving problems with many prominent approaches such as systems engineering and operations research can be characterized as systematic thinking . While quite appropriate for machine age problems, it lacks the theoretical rigor and systemic perspective necessary to deal with systems age messes . Thus, a new paradigm of systemic thinking , conceptually founded in systems theory, is necessary. This chapter provides a brief historical background on the development of systems approaches, contrasts systems approaches, and their underlying paradigm with systemic thinking, and introduces practical guidelines for the deployment of a systemic thinking approach that will provide the foundation for the remainder of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future: Systems approach to societal problems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1977). Optimization + Objectivity = Opt Out. European Journal of Operational Research, 1(1), 1–7.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1979). The future of operational research is past. Journal of Operational Research Society, 30(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the corporate future: Plan or be planned for. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Re-creating the corporation: A design of organizations for the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, K. M., & Mun, J. H. (2005). The application of systems thinking and systems theory to systems engineering. In Proceedings of the 26th National ASEM Conference: Organizational Transformation: Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 493–500). Virginia Beach, VA: American Society for Engineering Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts, D., Apostel, L., De Moor, B., Hellemans, S., Maex, E., Van Belle, H., & Van Der Veken, J. 1994. World views: From fragmentation to integration. Brussels: VUB Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1979). The heart of the enterprise. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the firm (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the system for organizations. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1995). Beyond dispute: The invention of team syntegrity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2011). Systems engineering and analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K., & Meckler, M. (2010). Decision errors of the 4th, 5th and 6th kind. In P. C. Nutt & D. C. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of decision making (pp. 327–348). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, J., & Sauser, B. (2013). Systemic thinking: Building maps for worlds of systems. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N. (1928). The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature, 121(3050), 580–590.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. (1929). Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiological Reviews, 9(3), 399–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. W., & Price, C. C. (2001). Operations research: A practical introduction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1993). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., & Scholes, J. (1999). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman. C. W.1968. The systems approach (Reviwed and Updated ed.). New York: Dell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979). The Design of Inquiring systems: Basic concepts of systems and organization. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., & Arnoff, E. L. (1957). Introduction to operations research. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, N. J., Dortmans, P. J., & Ciuk, J. (2006). ‘Doing the right problem’ versus ‘doing the problem right’: Problem structuring within a land force environment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(11), 1300–1312.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alembert, J. (1743). Traité de dynamique. Paris: David l’Ainé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flagle, C., Huggins, W., & Roy, R. (1960). Operations research and systems engineering. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1969). Urban dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1971). World dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. E., Scherer, W. T., & Gibson, W. E. (2007). How to do systems analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, H., & Machol, R. (1957). Systems engineering: An introduction to the design of large-scale systems. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. D. (1962). A methodology for systems engineering. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, P. T. (2012). Why optimization of a system of systems is both unattainable and unnecessary. International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, 3(3/4), 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. (2013). Thinking systemically about complex systems. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 312–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyer, R. (2004). Understanding soft operations research: The methods, their application and its future in the defence setting (DSTO-GD-0411). Edinburgh, Australia: DSTO Information Sciences Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, F. S., & Lieberman, G. J. (2009). Introduction to operations research (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hitch, C. J. (1953). Sub-optimization in operations problems. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 1(3), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1990). Beyond a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(8), 657–668.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991). Systems methodology for the management sciences. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems approaches to management. New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C., & Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex-complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2004). Housing and health: From interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice. Futures, 36, 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maani, K. E., & Cavana, R. Y. (2000). Systems thinking, systems dynamics: Understanding change and complexity. Auckland, NZ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Science, 15(8), B403–B414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: Theory, cases and techniques. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocchi, F. (2008). Complexity in biology: Exceeding the limits of reductionism and determinism using complexity theory. EMBO Reports, 9(1), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, J., & Trefethen, F. (1954). Operations research for management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2012). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet, I., & Gogan, J. L. (2006). A dialectical framework for problem structuring and information technology. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(4), 434–442.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2010). Realising systems thinking: Knowledge and action in management science. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I. (1998). Smart thinking for crazy times: The art of solving the right problems. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., Barabba, C. P., & Kilmann, R. H. (1977). The application of behavioral and philosophical techniques to strategic planning: A case study of a large federal agency. Management Science, 24(1), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., & Emshoff, J. R. (1979). On Strategic assumption-making: A dialectical approach to policy and planning. The Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., Emshoff, J. R., & Kilmann, R. H. (1979). Assumptional analysis: A methodology for strategic problem solving. Management Science, 25(6), 583–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., & Featheringham, T. R. (1974). On systematic problem solving and the error of the third kind. Behavioral Science, 19(6), 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. The Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, P., & Kimball, G. (Eds.). (1951). Methods of operations research. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F. (1948). A K-sample slippage test for an extreme population. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19(1), 58–65.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, I., & Mingers, J. (2002). The use of multimethodology in practice–results of a survey of practitioners. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(4), 369–378.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. V. (1996). Whats the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods. Interfaces, 26(6), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage, A. P. (1992). Systems engineering. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the unknowable: Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taha, H. A. (2011). Operations research: An introduction (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A. R., & White, L. A. (1993). After OR: An agenda for postmodernism and poststructuralism in OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(9), 867–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988). Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research. Systems Practice, 1(2), 137–163. doi:10.1007/BF01059855.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H. (1957). The strategy of genes: A discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A., & Taket, A. R. (1997). Beyond appraisal: Participatory appraisal of needs and the development of action (PANDA). Omega, 25(5), 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A., & Taket, A. R. (2000). Exploring the use of narrative analysis as an operational research method: A case study in voluntary sector evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(6), 700–711.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, K., & Reid, C. (2004). Assumptions, ambiguities, and possibilities in interdisciplinary population health research. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 95, 434–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C. A. (1998). Building a care and research team. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 160(Suppl 1), S137–S140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA

    Patrick T. Hester

  2. Information Technology and Computer Science, University of Maryland University College, Adelphi, MD, USA

    Kevin MacG. Adams

Authors
  1. Patrick T. Hester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin MacG. Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick T. Hester .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hester, P.T., Adams, K.M. (2017). Systemic Thinking. In: Systemic Decision Making. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54672-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54672-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54671-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54672-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation