Once we’ve decided on a course of action, we must implement it. This requires human intervention in some capacity, even if it’s initializing a computer algorithm or turning on a machine. In inserting a human into our process, we create an opportunity for human error. This chapter discusses the classification, management, and prevention of these errors as it focuses on decision implementation.
- Boulding, K. E. (1966). The impact of social sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Center for Chemical Process Safety. (2004). Human performance understanding and error. Guidelines for preventing human error in process safety. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Kontogiannis, T., & Malakis, S. (2009). A proactive approach to human error detection and identification in aviation and air traffic control. Safety Science, 47(5), 693–706.Google Scholar
- Rasmussen, J. (1976). Outlines of a hybrid model of the process operator. In S. A. Johannsen (Ed.), Monitoring behaviour and supervisory control. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Rasmussen, J. (1980). What can be learned from human error reports? In K. D. Duncan, M. M. Gruneberg, & D. Wallis (Eds.), Changes in working life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (2000). The human factors analysis and classification system—HFACS. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.Google Scholar