Advertisement

Understanding PLM System Concepts to Facilitate Its Implementation in SME: The Real Case Study of POULT

  • Laureline Plo
  • Vincent RobinEmail author
  • Philippe Girard
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 492)

Abstract

In 2012, our research team in partnership with LASCOM (a French PLM software editor) proposed models and an approach to help SMEs when they decide to deploy PLM systems [1, 2]. Our approach was to use formalism based on mind maps to promote exchanges between customer/users and PLM editor. Objective was to facilitate definition of elements that have to be defined, modeled, evaluated and implemented in a software solution to make deployment process more effective. Different real case studies emphasized that our approach have to evolve to be more “customer” centered. In this paper we present one of these real case studies which is in progress. This research collaboration concerns POULT, a manufacturer of biscuits which decided to deploy a PLM solution in few months. We describe the adopted approach to analyze the users’ needs and draft the request for proposal which will be send to PLM editors.

Keywords

PLM concepts Progressive “user” centered approach 

References

  1. 1.
    Baczkowski, M.: Amélioration du processus de déploiement d’une solution PLM par l’utilisation de cartes heuristiques et de persona: cas LASCOM. Thesis of the University of Bordeaux (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baczkowski, M., Robin, V., Rose, B.: Using of the concepts of roles and context in a project management/PLM Solution: the real case study of LASCOM. In: 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (ASME-ESDA2012), Nantes, France (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stark, J.: Product Lifecycle Management: 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realization. Springer, London (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    El Kadiri, S., Pernelle, P., Delattre, M., Bouras, A.: Current situation of PLM systems in SME/SMI: survey’s results and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th International conference Conf Product Lifecycle Management (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruno, G., Antonelli, D., Villa, A.: A reference ontology to support product lifecycle management. 9th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, in Procedia CIRP, vol. 33, pp. 41–46 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKenzie-Veal, D., Hartman, N.W., Springer, J.: Implementing Ontology-Based Information Sharing in Product Lifecycle Management. Academia.edu, San Francisco (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abdul-Ghafour, S.: Integration of product models by ontology development. In: IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jurisica, I., Mylopoulos, J., Yu, E.: Ontologies for knowledge management: an information systems perspective. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 6, 380–401 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lacombe, C.: Contribution à une méthodologie et une modélisation pour accompagner les petites entreprises dans l’étude de leur organisation afin de spécifier leurs besoins et sélectionner une solution ERP. Thesis of the University of Bordeaux (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rose, J., Pedersen, K., Hosbond, J.H., Kraemmergaard, P.: Management competences, not tools and techniques: a grounded examination of software project management at WM-data. Inf. Soft. Technol. 49(6), 605–624 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petter, S.: Managing user expectations on software projects: lessons from the trenches. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26(7), 700–712 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laureline Plo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vincent Robin
    • 2
    Email author
  • Philippe Girard
    • 2
  1. 1.Groupe POULT – Site de MontaubanMontaubanFrance
  2. 2.IMS LaboratoryUniversity of BordeauxTalenceFrance

Personalised recommendations