Advertisement

Agile and Project-Planned Methods in Multidisciplinary Product Design

  • Benjamin GuérineauEmail author
  • Louis Rivest
  • Matthieu Bricogne
  • Alexandre Durupt
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 492)

Abstract

This paper presents a method introducing Agile practices in project planned methodology in the context of a multidisciplinary product design. These multidisciplinary products can be Mechatronics or Cyber-Physical-Systems. Various design methodologies and types of project architecture already exist. Some of them are focused on a micro-level, whereas others are on a macro-level. Our proposition is focused on the macro-level. Agile and project-planned methods are presented and analyzed before looking at a possible hybridization. Hybrid solutions already exist, but this paper formalizes a project architecture to combine the advantages of project-planned and Agile methods and to describe the relative PLM position.

Keywords

PLM Multidisciplinary design methodology Agile Project-planned 

References

  1. 1.
    Abramovici, M., Bellalouna, F.: Integration and complexity management within the mechatronics product development. In: Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufacturing Businesses (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-935-4_20
  2. 2.
    Harashima, F., Tomizuka, M., Fukuda, T.: Mechatronics - what is it, why, and how? IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 1, 1–4 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baheti, R., Gill, H.: Cyber-physical systems. Impact Control Technol. 161–166 (2011). doi: 10.1145/1795194.1795205
  4. 4.
    Rajkumar, R.: A cyber-physical future. Proc. IEEE 100, 1309–1312 (2012). doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2189915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bricogne, M.: Méthode Agile pour la conception collaborative multidisciplinaire de systèmes intégrés: application à la Mécatronique. Université de Technologie de Compiègne (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergsjö, D.: Management of Mechatronic Product Data in PLM Systems. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sellgren, U., Törngren, M., Malvius, D., Biehl, M.: PLM for mechatronics integration. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Product Lifecycle Management Conference (PLM 2009) (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stark, J.: Product Lifecycle Management (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17440-2 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matthews, P.C., Lomas, C.D.W., Armoutis, N.D., Maropoulos, P.G.: Foundations of an agile design methodology. Int. J. Agile Manufact. 9, 29–37 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sommer, A.F., Dukovska-Popovska, I., Steger-Jensen, K.: Agile product development governance – on governing the emerging scrum/stage-gate hybrids. In: Grabot, B., Vallespir, B., Gomes, S., Bouras, A., Kiritsis, D. (eds.) APMS 2014. IAICT, vol. 438, pp. 184–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44739-0_23 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J.: The scrum guide. Scrum.org (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 9th edn. Pearson, London (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Highsmith, J.: What is agile software development? J. Defense Softw. Eng. 15, 4–9 (2002). doi: 10.1109/MC.2007.73 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations. IEEE Softw. 22, 30–39 (2005). doi: 10.1109/MS.2005.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ronkainen, J., Abrahamsson, P.: Software development under stringent hardware constraints: do agile methods have a chance? In: Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2675, pp. 73–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi: 10.1007/3-540-44870-5_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang, P.M., Darrin, A.G., Knuth, A.A.: Agile hardware and software system engineering for innovation. In: 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, Big Sky (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gidel, T., Zonghero, W.: Management de projet: Approfondissements. Lavoisier, Cachan (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Girard, P., Doumeingts, G.: Modelling the engineering design system to improve performance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 46, 43–67 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2003.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ovesen, N.: The Challenges of Becoming Agile: Implementing and Conducting Scrum in Integrated Product Development. Aalborg University, Aalborg (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CIMdata: Simulation Lifecycle Management - More than data management for simulation. Ann Arbor, Michigan (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ottino, A., Duigou, J.L.E., Vosgien, T., Figay, N., Lardeur, P., Eynard, B.: Gestion et réutilisation des données de simulation: vers une approche de vérification et validation des modèles. 22ème Congrès Français de Mécanique (2015). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2295.1440

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Guérineau
    • 1
    Email author
  • Louis Rivest
    • 2
  • Matthieu Bricogne
    • 1
  • Alexandre Durupt
    • 1
  1. 1.Sorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, UMR 7337 Roberval, Centre de Recherche Royallieu - CS 60 319Compiègne CedexFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire NumérixEcole de Technologie SupérieureMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations