Advertisement

Zen and Desire

  • Kiyozumi Seijun IshiiEmail author
  • Akihiko Masuda
  • Kayla Sargent
Chapter
Part of the Mindfulness in Behavioral Health book series (MIBH)

Abstract

In Zen and Desire, Prof. Seijun Ishii of Komazawa University explains how Zen Buddhism offers a unique account of desire, discussing desire itself as well as attachment to specific desires (bonno in Japanese), sometimes referred to as earthly desire. According to Ishii, Zen is based upon the absolute validation or affirmation of the self and reality, fostering a fundamental assumption that desires are not a separate entity, and they do not inherently prevent people from becoming a Buddha. From a Zen perspective, individuals are essentially pure, and the Buddha Nature exists in every sentient being. Ishii presents a historical perspective in terms of how desire has been approached by various Buddhist patriarchs and how those perspectives influence how desire is conceptualized in modern-day Zen. Within Zen Buddhism, worldly desires are not events to be eliminated deliberately. Instead, they are the internal events to which one must learn to relate to wisely. To unfold the Buddha Nature, one must continue to practice.

Keywords

Zen Buddhism Behavioral health Desire Bonno 

References

  1. Broughton, J. L. (2009). Zongmi on Chan New York. US: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dumoulin, H. (2005a). Zen Buddhism: A history volume 1: India and China. Bloomington, Indiana US: World Wisdom.Google Scholar
  3. Dumoulin, H. (2005b). Zen Buddhism: A history volume 2: Japan. Bloomington, Indiana US: World Wisdom.Google Scholar
  4. Ferguson, A. (2011). Zen’s Chinese heritage: The masters and their teachings. Somerville MA, US: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  5. McRae, J. R. (2000). The platform Sutra of the sixty Patriarch. Berkeley, CA USA: Murata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research.Google Scholar
  6. Poceski, M. (2015). The records of Mazu and the making of classical Chan literature. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Shibayama, Z. (2000). The gateless barrier: Zen comments on the mumonkan Boston, MA, US: Shambhala Publication (originally published in 1974).Google Scholar
  8. Uchiyama, K., Wright, T., Warner, J., & Okumura, S. (2004). Opening the hand of thought: Foundations of Zen Buddhism practice. Somerville MA, US: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Yampolsky, P. B. (1971). The Zen Master Hakuin: Selected writing. New York, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Yu, C. F. (1979). Ta-hui Tsung-Kao and Kung-an Chan. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 6(2), 211–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6253.1979.tb00084.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiyozumi Seijun Ishii
    • 1
    Email author
  • Akihiko Masuda
    • 2
  • Kayla Sargent
    • 2
  1. 1.Komazawa UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.University of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations