Advertisement

Zen and Science: Zen as an Ethical Guideline for Scientists’ Conducts

  • Rosan YoshidaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Mindfulness in Behavioral Health book series (MIBH)

Abstract

Since it was first introduced to the West in early 1900s, many scholars and practitioners have discussed Zen along with sciences in various foci. What has not been fully discussed, however, is the potential role of Zen as an overarching ethical guideline for the behavior of scientists as well as the consumers of science. In this chapter, Reverent Rosan Yoshida Roshi argues the importance of establishing and adhering to such a guideline and states that Zen is particularly suitable to promote it. First, Yoshida argues that unlike our image of science as being value-free and bias-free, science is a human enterprise which is extremely vulnerable to our tendency to prioritize the demands from ego (i.e., me-ism/selfishness/sinfulness), which is often manifested as utilitarianism, materialism, militarism, and the money-ism. Yoshida then states that these tendencies are destructive and threatens the entire ecosystem. According to Yoshida, Zen teachings can counteract or mitigate this tendency as it emphasizes collective wholeness as its ultimate goals and presents remedies for lessening these egocentric demands.

Keywords

Ethics Science Zen Buddhism Zen Humanity 

References

  1. Barney, G. O. (1999). Threshold 2000: Critical issues and spiritual values for a global age. Ada, Minnesota: CoNexus Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chiesa, A. (2009). Zen meditation: An integration of current evidence. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(5), 585–592. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0416
  3. Dogen, E. and (2004). Beyond thinking: A guide to Zen meditation. In Kazuaki Tanahashi (ed.). Boston, US: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Dogen, E., Nishiari, B., Okumura, S., Suzuki, S., & Weisman, S. M. (2011). Dogen’s genjo koan: Three commentaries. Barkeley, CA, US: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  5. Dogen, E., Uchiyama, K., Okumura, S., & Leighton, T. D. (1997). The wholehearted way: A translation of Eihei Dogen’s Bendowa with commentary by Kosho Uchiyama Roshi. North Clarendon, VT, US: Tuttle Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Easlea, B. (1980). Einstein’s political struggle. In M. Goldsmith, A. Mackay, & J. Woudhuysen (Eds.), Einstein: The first hundred years (pp. 117–125). Pergamon.Google Scholar
  7. Gergen, K. J. (1983). Zen Buddhism and psychological science. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 26(3), 129–141.Google Scholar
  8. Iino, N. (1962). Dogen’s Zen view of interdependence. Philosophy East and West, 12(1), 51–57. doi: 10.2307/1397245
  9. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kung, H., & Kuschel, K. J. (1993). A global ethic: The declaration of the Parliament of the World’s Religions. New York, US: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Kurak, M. (2003). The relevance of the Buddhist theory of dependent co-origination to cognitive science. Brain & Mind, 4(3), 341–351. doi: 10.1023/B:BRAM.0000005468.95009.86
  12. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits of growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind.Google Scholar
  13. Mikulas, W. L. (2008). Buddhist psychology: A Western interpretation. In K. R. Rao, A. C. Paranjpe, A. K. Dalal, K. R. Rao, A. C. Paranjpe, & A. K. Dalal (Eds.), Handbook of Indian psychology (pp. 142–162). New Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press India/Foundation Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muramoto, S. (2002). Buddhism, religion and psychotherapy in the world today. In P. Young-Eisendrath, S. Muramoto, P. Young-Eisendrath, & S. Muramoto (Eds.), Awakening and insight: Zen Buddhism and psychotherapy (pp. 15–29). New York, NY, US: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Nanamoli, B., & Bodhi, B. (2005). The middle length discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Majjhima Nikaya.Google Scholar
  16. Rosemont, H. J. (1970). Is Zen Buddhism a philosophy? Philosophy East & West, 20, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Oxford, England: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  18. Suzuki, D. T. (1996). Zen Buddhism: Selected writings of D. T. Suzuki. New York, US: An Image Book.Google Scholar
  19. Suzuki, D. T. (2010). The training of the Zen Buddhist Monk. New York, US: Cosimo, Inc. (original work published in 1934).Google Scholar
  20. Thera, S. (1981). Kalama Sutta: The Buddha’s charter of free inquiry Berkeley. CA, US: Buddhist Publication Society.Google Scholar
  21. Uchiyama, K., & Okumura, S. (2014). The Zen teaching of homeless Kodo. Somerville MA, US: Tuttle Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Wallace, B. A. (2003). Introduction: Buddhism and science—Breaking down the barriers. In B. A. Wallace (Ed.), Buddhism and science: Breaking new ground (pp. 1–30).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Missouri Zen CenterWebster GrovesUSA

Personalised recommendations