Advertisement

A Reduced Complexity, Hybrid Empirical-Mechanistic Model of Eutrophication and Hypoxia in Shallow Marine Ecosystems

  • Mark J. Brush
  • Scott W. Nixon
Chapter

Abstract

Numerical simulation models have a long history as research tools for the study of coastal marine ecosystems, and are increasingly being used to inform management, particularly related to nutrient-fueled eutrophication. Demand for modeling assessments is rapidly increasing, and managers need generally applicable tools that can be rapidly applied with limited resources. Additionally, a variety of calls have been made for the development of reduced complexity models for use in parallel with more complex models. We propose a simplified, empirically constrained modeling approach that simulates the first-order processes involved in estuarine eutrophication, contains a small number of aggregated state variables and a reduced set of parameters, and combines traditional mechanistic formulations with robust, data-driven, empirical functions shown to apply across multiple systems. The model was applied to Greenwich Bay, RI (USA), a subestuary of Narragansett Bay, and reproduced the annual cycles of phytoplankton biomass, dissolved inorganic nutrients, and dissolved oxygen, events including phytoplankton blooms and development of hypoxia, and the rate of annual primary production. While the model was relatively robust to changes in parameter values and initial conditions, sensitivity analysis revealed the need for better constraint of the phytoplankton carbon-to-chlorophyll ratio, temperature dependence of phytoplankton production, and parameters associated with our formulations for water column respiration and the flux of phytoplankton carbon to the sediments. This reduced complexity, hybrid empirical-mechanistic approach provides a rapidly deployable modeling tool applicable to a wide variety of shallow estuarine systems.

Keywords

Ecosystem model Estuarine eutrophication Phytoplankton Nutrients Hypoxia Greenwich Bay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank J.N. Kremer and J.W. Brawley, with whom this approach and formulations were developed while working on parallel models for Greenwich Bay and Waquoit Bay, MA. The work further benefited from frequent discussions with C.A. Oviatt, A.A. Keller, S.L. Granger, A.J. Gold, D.E. Campbell, P.V. August, L. Erikson, and M.L. Spaulding. S.L. Granger, M. Traber, M. Richardson, and B. Buckley were responsible for much of the data collection in Greenwich Bay. Funding for this research was provided by the Rhode Island Sea Grant College Program (NOAA), Narragansett Electric, and the NOAA Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research (Coastal Hypoxia Research Program, grant no. NA05NOS4781201). This is VIMS’ contribution no. 3620 and NOAA Coastal Hypoxia Research Program contribution no. 213.

References

  1. Abdelrhman MA (2005) Simplified modeling of flushing and residence times in 42 embayments in New England, USA, with special attention to Greenwich Bay, Rhode Island. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 62:339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird ME, Walker SJ, Wallace BB, Webster IT, Parslow JS (2003) The use of mechanistic descriptions of algal growth and zooplankton grazing in an estuarine eutrophication model. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 56(3–4):685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beatty LL (1991) The response of benthic suspension feeders and their grazing impact on phytoplankton in eutrophied coastal ecosystems. PhD dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 351 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Boynton WR, Murray L, Hagy JD, Stokes C, Kemp WM, (1996) A comparative analysis of eutrophication patterns in a temperate coastal lagoon. Estuaries 19(2), 408–412Google Scholar
  5. Bricker S, Longstaff B, Dennison W, Jones A, Boicourt K, Wicks C, Woerner J (2007) Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation’s estuaries: a decade of change. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 26, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, MD, 328 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Brush MJ (2002) Development of a numerical model for shallow marine ecosystems with application to Greenwich Bay, RI. PhD Dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 560 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Brush MJ, Brawley JW (2009) Adapting the light · biomass (BZI) models of phytoplankton primary production to shallow marine ecosystems. J Marine Syst 75:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brush MJ, Brawley JW, Nixon SW, Kremer JN (2002) Modeling phytoplankton production: problems with the Eppley curve and an empirical alternative. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 238:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brush MJ, Harris LA (2010) Introduction to the special issue of Ecological Modelling: advances in modeling estuarine and coastal ecosystems: approaches, validation, and applications. Ecol Model 221:965–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brush MJ, Harris LA (2016) Ecological modeling. In: Kennish MJ (ed) Encyclopedia of Estuaries. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 214–223Google Scholar
  11. Brush MJ, Nixon SW (2010) Modeling the role of macroalgae in a shallow sub-estuary of Narragansett Nay, RI (USA). Ecol Model 221:1065–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caffrey JM (2003) Production, respiration and net ecosystem metabolism in U.S. estuaries. Environ Monit Assess 81:207–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Caffrey JM, Cloern JE, Grenz C (1998) Changes in production and respiration during a spring phytoplankton bloom in San Francisco Bay, California, USA: implications for net ecosystem metabolism. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 172:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cerco CF, Noel MR (2004a) The 2002 Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication Model. Report 903-R-04-004, Chesapeake Bay Program Office. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Annapolis, MD, p 349Google Scholar
  15. Cerco CF, Noel MR (2004b) Process-based primary production modeling in Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 282:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen C, Tian R, Beardsley RC, Qi J, Xu Q (2010) Modeling 2008 in Massachusetts Bay using an upgraded unstructured-grid Bays Eutrophication Model. Report 2010–2015, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Boston, MA, 118 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Cloern JE, Grenz C, Vidergar-Lucas L (1995) An empirical model of the phytoplankton chlorophyll:carbon ratio—the conversion factor between productivity and growth rate. Limnol Oceanogr 40(7):1313–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole BE (1989) Temporal and spatial patterns of phytoplankton production in Tomales Bay, California, USA. Est Coast Shelf Sci 28:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole BE, Cloern JE (1987) An empirical model for estimating phytoplankton productivity in estuaries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 36:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Denman KL (2003) Modelling planktonic ecosystems: parameterizing complexity. Prog Oceanogr 57(3–4):429–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doering PH, Oviatt CA (1986) Application of filtration rate models to field populations of bivalves: an assessment using experimental mesocosms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 31:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duarte CM, Amthor JS, DeAngelis DL, Joyce LA, Maranger RJ, Pace ML, Pastor J, Running SW (2003) The limits to models in ecology. In: Canham CD, Cole JJ, Lauenroth WK (eds) Models in ecosystem Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 437–451Google Scholar
  23. Durbin EG, Krawiec RW, Smayda TJ (1975) Seasonal studies on the relative importance of different size fractions of phytoplankton in Narragansett Bay (USA). Mar Biol 32(3):271–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1999) Protocol for developing nutrient TMDLs. U.S. EPA report 841-B-99-007, U.S. EPA Office of Water, Washington, DC, 135 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Eppley RW (1972) Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea. Fish Bull 70(4):1063–1085Google Scholar
  26. Erikson LH (1998) Flushing times of Greenwich Bay, Rhode Island: estimates based on freshwater inputs. M.S. thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 178 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Fourqurean JW, Webb KL, Hollibaugh JT, Smith SV (1997) Contributions of the plankton community to ecosystem respiration, Tomales Bay, California. Est Coast Shelf Sci 44(4):493–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fraher J (1991) Atmospheric wet and dry deposition of fixed nitrogen to Narragansett Bay. M.S. thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 165 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Friedrichs MAM, Hood RR, Wiggert JD (2006) Ecosystem model complexity versus physical forcing: quantification of their relative impact with assimilated Arabian Sea data. Deep-Sea Res Pt II 53:576–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frithsen JB, Keller AA, Pilson MEQ (1985a) Effects of inorganic nutrient additions in coastal areas: a mesocosm experiment data report, vol 1. MERL series, report no 3, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 176 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Frithsen JB, Keller AA, Pilson MEQ (1985b) Effects of inorganic nutrient additions in coastal areas: a mesocosm experiment data report, vol 3. MERL series, report no 5, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 244 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Frithsen JB, Lane PA, Keller AA, Pilson MEQ (1985c) Effects of inorganic nutrient additions in coastal areas: a mesocosm experiment data report, vol 2. MERL series, report no 4, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 330 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Johnson CR (2003) Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Johnson CR (2004) Effects of spatial resolution on the performance and interpretation of marine ecosystem models. Ecol Model 176(1–2):27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Furnas MJ, Hitchcock GL, Smayda TJ (1976) Nutrient-phytoplankton relationships in Narragansett Bay during the 1974 spring bloom. In: Wiley M (ed) Estuarine Processes, vol I., Uses, stresses, and adaptation to the estuaryAcademic Press, New York, NY, pp 118–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ganju NK, Brush MJ, Rashleigh B, Aretxabaleta AL, del Barrio P, Forsyth M, Grear JS, Harris LA, Lake SJ, McCardell G, O’Donnell J, Ralston DK, Signell RP, Testa JM, Vaudrey JMP (2016) Progress and challenges in coupled hydrodynamic-ecological estuarine modeling. Est Coast. 39:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ganz A, Lazar N, Valliere A (1994) Quahaug management project, phase I: Greenwich Bay. Report to the Narragansett Bay Project, Rhode Island Division of Fish, Wildlife and Estuarine Resources, Coastal Fisheries Lab, Wakefield, RI, 58 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Geider RJ, MacIntyre HL, Kana TM (1998) A dynamic regulatory model of phytoplanktonic acclimation to light, nutrients, and temperature. Limnol Oceanogr 43(4):679–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Giblin AE, Vallino JJ (2003) The role of models in addressing coastal eutrophication. In: Canham CD, Cole JJ, Lauenroth WK (eds) Models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 327–343Google Scholar
  40. Goebel NL, Kremer JN (2007) Temporal and spatial variability of photosynthetic parameters and community respiration in Long Island Sound. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 329:23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Granger S, Brush M, Buckley B, Traber M, Richardson M, Nixon SW (2000) An assessment of eutrophication in Greenwich Bay. Paper no. 1 In: Schwartz M (ed) Restoring water quality in Greenwich Bay: a whitepaper series. Rhode Island Sea Grant College Program, Narragansett, RI, 19 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Grangere K, Lefebvre S, Menesguen A, Jouenne F (2009) On the interest of using field primary production data to calibrate phytoplankton rate processes in ecosystem models. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 81(2):169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harris GP, Bigelow SW, Cole JJ, Cyr H, Janus LL, Kinzig AP, Kitchell JF, Likens GE, Reckhow KH, Scavia D, Soto D, Talbot LM, Templer PH (2003) The role of models in ecosystem management. In: Canham CD, Cole JJ, Lauenroth WK (eds) Models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 299–307Google Scholar
  44. Harris LA, Brush MJ (2012) Bridging the gap between empirical and mechanistic models of aquatic primary production with the metabolic theory of ecology: an example from estuarine ecosystems. Ecol Model 233:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hibbert CJ (1977) Energy relations of the bivalve Mercenaria mercenaria on an intertidal mudflat. Mar Biol 44:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holligan PM, IeB Williams PJ, Purdie D, Harris RP (1984) Photosynthesis, respiration and nitrogen supply of plankton populations in stratified, frontal and tidally mixed shelf waters. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 17:201–213Google Scholar
  47. Hopkinson CS Jr, Smith EM (2005) Estuarine respiration: an overview of benthic, pelagic, and whole system respiration. In: Giorgio PA del IeB Williams PJ (eds) Respiration in aquatic systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 122–146Google Scholar
  48. Howarth RW, Marino R, Garritt R, Sherman D (1992) Ecosystem respiration and organic carbon processing in a large, tidally influenced river: the Hudson River. Biogeochemistry 16:83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. HydroQual (1991) Water quality modeling analysis of hypoxia in Long Island Sound. Report to the Management Committee of the Long Island Sound Estuary Study and the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, HydroQual Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 280 ppGoogle Scholar
  50. Iriarte A, Daneri G, Garcia VMT, Purdie DA, Crawford DW (1991) Plankton community respiration and its relationship to chlorophyll a concentration in marine coastal waters. Oceanol Acta 14(4):379–388Google Scholar
  51. Jensen LM, Sand-Jensen K, Marcher S, Hansen M (1990) Plankton community respiration along a nutrient gradient in a shallow Danish estuary. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 61(1–2):75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jiang MS, Zhou M (2008) Massachusetts Bay Eutrophication Model: 2005 simulation. Report 2008–2013 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Boston, MA, 85 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Keller AA (1986) Modeling the productivity of natural phytoplankton populations using mesocosm data along a nutrient gradient. PhD dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 240 ppGoogle Scholar
  54. Keller AA (1988) Estimating phytoplankton productivity from light availability and biomass in the MERL mesocosms and Narragansett Bay. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 45:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kelly JR, Doering PH (1997) Monitoring and modeling primary production in coastal waters: studies in Massachusetts Bay 1992–1994. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 148:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kemp WM, Sampou PA, Garber J, Tuttle J, Boynton WR (1992) Seasonal depletion of oxygen from bottom waters of Chesapeake Bay: roles of benthic and planktonic respiration and physical exchange processes. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 85(1–2):137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kremer JN, Nixon SW (1978) A coastal marine ecosystem: simulation and analysis. Springer, New York, NY 217 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kremer JN, Vaudrey J, Ullman D, Bergondo D, LaSota N, Kincaid C, Codiga D, Brush MJ (2010) Simulating property exchange in estuarine ecosystem models at ecologically appropriate scales. Ecol Model 221(7):1080–1088Google Scholar
  59. Lefèvre N, Taylor AH, Gilbert FJ, Geider RJ (2003) Modeling carbon to nitrogen and carbon to chlorophyll a ratios in the ocean at low latitudes: evaluation of the role of physiological plasticity. Limnol Oceanogr 48(5):1796–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Levins R (1966) The strategy of model building in population biology. Am Sci 54:421–431Google Scholar
  61. Li Y, Smayda TJ (1998) Temporal variability of chlorophyll in Narragansett Bay, 1973–1990. ICES J Mar Sci 55(4):661–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Loosanoff VL (1939) Effect of temperature upon shell movements of clams, Venus mercenaria (L). Biol Bull 76:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marino R, Howarth RW (1993) Atmospheric oxygen exchange in the Hudson River: dome measurements and comparison with other natural waters. Estuaries 16(3A):433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McGlathery KJ, Sundbäck K, Anderson IC (2007) Eutrophication in shallow coastal bays and lagoons: the role of plants in the coastal filter. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 348:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ménesguen A, Cugier P, Loyer S, Vanhoutte-Brunier A, Hoch T, Guillaud J-F, Gohin F (2007) Two- or three-layered box-models versus fine 3D models for coastal ecological modelling? A comparative study in the English Channel (Western Europe). J Marine Syst 64(1–4):47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moncoiffe G, Alvarez-Salgado XA, Figueiras FG, Savidge G (2000) Seasonal and short-time-scale dynamics of microplankton community production and respiration in an inshore upwelling system. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 196:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. NGDC (National Geophysical Data Center) (1996) GEOphysical DAta System for hydrographic survey data (CD-ROM database). U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  68. Nixon SW (1986) Nutrient dynamics and the productivity of marine coastal waters. In: Halwagy R, Clayton D, Behbehani M (eds) Marine environment and pollution. The Alden Press, Oxford, pp 97–115Google Scholar
  69. Nixon SW, Fulweiler RW, Buckley BA, Granger SL, Nowicki BL, Henry KM (2009) The impact of changing climate on phenology, productivity, and benthic-pelagic-coupling in Narragansett Bay. Est Coast Shelf Sci 82:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nixon SW, Ammerman JW, Atkinson LP, Berounsky VM, Billen G, Boicourt WC, Boynton WR, Church TM, DiToro DM, Elmgren R, Garber JH, Giblin AE, Jahnke RA, Owens NJP, Pilson MEQ, Seitzinger SP (1996) The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeochemistry 35:141–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nixon S, Buckley B, Granger S, Bintz J (2001) Response of very shallow marine ecosystems to nutrient enrichment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7:1457–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nixon SW, Granger SL, Nowicki BL (1995) An assessment of the annual mass balance of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in Narragansett Bay. Biogeochemistry 31:15–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nixon SW, Oviatt CA (1973) Ecology of a New England salt marsh. Ecol Monogr 43:463–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nixon SW, Oviatt CA, Frithsen J, Sullivan B (1986) Nutrients and the productivity of estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems. J Limnol Soc South Afr 12(1/2):43–71Google Scholar
  75. Nixon SW, Oviatt CA, Hale SS (1976) Nitrogen regeneration and the metabolism of coastal marine bottom communities. In: Anderson JM, Macfadyen A (eds) The role of terrestrial and aquatic organisms in decomposition processes. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 269–283Google Scholar
  76. Nowicki BL (1983) Benthic community metabolism in a coastal lagoon ecosystem. M.S. thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 109 ppGoogle Scholar
  77. Nowicki BL, Oviatt CA (1990) Are estuaries traps for anthropogenic nutrients? Evidence from estuarine mesocosms. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 66:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. NRC (National Research Council) (2000) Clean coastal waters: understanding and reducing the effects of nutrient pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 405 ppGoogle Scholar
  79. Obenour DR, Michalak A, Scavia D (2014) Assessing biophysical controls on Gulf of Mexico hypoxia through probabilistic modeling. Ecol Appl 25(2):492–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Odum HT (1994) Ecological and general systems: an introduction to systems ecology, 2nd edn. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO 644 ppGoogle Scholar
  81. Officer CB (1980) Box models revisited. In: Hamilton P, MacDonald KB (eds) Estuarine and wetland processes with emphasis on modeling. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 65–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Officer CB, Kester DR (1991) On estimating the non-advective tidal exchanges and advective gravitational circulation exchanges in an estuary. Est Coast Shelf Sci 32:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Oviatt C, Buckley B, Nixon S (1981) Annual phytoplankton metabolism in Narragansett Bay calculated from survey field measurement and micrososm observations. Estuaries 4(3):167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Oviatt C, Keller A, Reed L (2002) Annual primary production in Narragansett Bay with no bay-wide winter-spring phytoplankton bloom. Est Coast Shelf Sci 54:1013–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pace ML (2001) Prediction and the aquatic sciences. Can J Fish Aq Sci 58(1):63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pennock JR, Sharp JH (1986) Phytoplankton production in the Delaware Estuary: temporal and spatial variability. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 34:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pilson MEQ (1985) Annual cycles of nutrients and chlorophyll in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. J Mar Res 43:849–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Raick C, Soetaert K, Gregoire M (2006) Model complexity and performance: how far can we simplify? Progr Oceanogr 70(1):27–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Reckhow KH (1994) Water quality simulation modeling and uncertainty analysis for risk assessment and decision making. Ecol Model 72(1–2):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Riebesell U (1989) Comparison of sinking and sedimentation rate measurements in a diatom winter/spring bloom. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 54:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rigler FH, Peters RH (1995) Science and limnology. Book 6 In: Kinne O (ed) Excellence in ecology. International Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, 239 ppGoogle Scholar
  92. Rogers JM (2008) Circulation and transport in upper Narragansett Bay. M.S. thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 95 ppGoogle Scholar
  93. Rudnick D, Oviatt C (1986) Seasonal lags between organic carbon deposition and mineralization in marine sediments. J Mar Res 44(4):815–837Google Scholar
  94. Sampou P, Kemp WM (1994) Factors regulating plankton community respiration in Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 110:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Scavia D, Justic D, Bierman VJ Jr (2004) Reducing hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: advice from three models. Estuaries 27(3):419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Scavia D, Kelly ELA, Hagy JD (2006) A simple model for forecasting the effects of nitrogen loads on Chesapeake Bay hypoxia. Est Coasts 29:674–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Scavia D, Evans MA, Obenour DR (2013) A scenario and forecast model for Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia area and volume. Environ Sci Tech 47:10423–10428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Smith EM, Kemp WM (1995) Seasonal and regional variations in plankton community production and respiration for Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 116(1–3):217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stickney AP, Stringer LD (1957) A study of the invertebrate bottom fauna of Greenwich Bay, Rhode Island. Ecology 38(1):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stow CA, Roessler C, Borsuk ME, Bowen JD, Reckhow KH (2003) Comparison of estuarine water quality models for total maximum daily load development in Neuse River Estuary. J Water Resour Plann Manage 129(4):307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Swaney DP, Scavia D, Howarth RW, Marino RM (2008) Estuarine classification and response to nitrogen loading: insights from simple ecological models. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 77:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Swanson JC, Jayko K (1988) A simplified estuarine box model of Narragansett Bay. Final report to the Narragansett Bay Project and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Applied Science Associates, Narragansett, RI 80 ppGoogle Scholar
  103. Testa JM, Kemp WM (2008) Regional, seasonal, and inter-annual variability of biogeochemical processes and physical transport in a partially stratified estuary: a box-modeling analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 356:63–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Turner RE (1978) Community plankton respiration in a salt marsh estuary and the importance of macrophytic leachates. Limnol Oceanogr 23(3):442–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Valiela I, Foreman K, LaMontagne M, Hersh D, Costa J, Peckol P, DeMeo-Andreson B, D’Avanzo C, Babione M, Sham C-H, Brawley J, Lajtha K (1992) Couplings of watersheds and coastal waters: sources and consequences of nutrient enrichment in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Estuaries 15(4):443–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Van Nes EH, Scheffer M (2005) A strategy to improve the contribution of complex simulation models to ecological theory. Ecol Model 185:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Vargo GA (1979) The contribution of ammonia excreted by zooplankton to phytoplankton production in Narragansett Bay. J Plankton Res 1(1):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Vollenweider RA (1974) A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 225 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Virginia Institute of Marine ScienceCollege of William and MaryGloucester PointUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of OceanographyUniversity of Rhode IslandNarragansettUSA

Personalised recommendations