Advertisement

Induction of Polyploidy and Its Effect on Cannabis sativa L.

  • Hakimeh MansouriEmail author
  • Mahsa Bagheri
Chapter

Abstract

Polyploids are organisms with three or more complete chromosome sets. Polyploidization is widespread in plants, and is an important mechanism of speciation. Polyploids can be formed in various ways. The study of polyploids has both important theoretical significance and valuable applications. The production and application of polyploidy breeding have brought remarkable economic and social benefits. We reported the production of putative tetraploid plants of Cannabis sativa L., with the ultimate aim of improving the medicinal and physiological traits of this widely distributed cultivated plant. The production of tetraploid plant was improved with colchicine at different concentrations and time through dropping method. Flow cytometry analysis was used to confirm the ploidy level. Morphologic, anatomic and biochemical characteristics were compared between tetraploid and diploid control plants. The results showed that 0.2% colchicine for 24 h was the most efficient for production of polyploid plants. The percentage of tetraploid plants and the survival rate were lowered by the increasing the treatment time. In addition, the leaf index and height of tetraploid plants exhibited a significant decrease compared to the diploid plants. The size of stomata on epidermis of leaves were larger in tetraploid plant compared to the diploid ones, in spite of the tetraploid plants have less stomata density. However, the amount of total chlorophyll and carotenoids were almost the same in both tetraploid and diploid plants. In addition, some differences were also observed in the cross section of stem of these plants from a descriptive structural point of view. Overall, the results introduced usage of the stomata parameters as an effective, fast and convenient method for detecting the tetraploid plants. We also investigated polyploidy effects on some primary and secondary metabolites. The results of biochemical analyzes showed that soluble sugars and total protein content increased significantly into mixoploid plants compared to tetraploid and diploid plants. Tetraploid plants had higher amount of total proteins compared with control plants. The results showed that polyploidization could increase the contents of tetrahydrocannabionol only in mixoploid plants but tetraploid plants had lower amounts of this substance in comparison with diploids. Our results suggest that tetraploidization was not useful for production of tetrahydrocannabinol for commercial use but mixoploids were found suitable.

Keywords

Ploidy Level Apical Meristem Female Flower Glandular Trichome Soluble Sugar Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allum JF, Bringloe DH, Roberts AV (2007) Chromosome doubling in Rosa rugosa Thunb. hybrid by exposure of in vitro nodes to oryzalin: the effects of node length, oryzalin concentration and exposure time. Plant Cell Rep 26:1977–1984 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagheri M, Mansouri H (2015) Effect of induced polyploidy on some biochemical parameters in Cannabis sativa L. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. doi:  10.1007/s12010-014-1435-8
  3. Bhojwani SS (2004) In vitro production of triploid plants. In: Goodman RM (ed) Encyclopedia of plant and crop science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 590–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanc G, Wolfe KH (2004) Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16:1667–1678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 7(72):248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones R (2000) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists. ISBN 81-88237-11–6Google Scholar
  7. Chakraborti SP, Vijayan K, Roy BN, Qadri SM (1998) In vitro induction of tetraploidy in mulberry (Morus alba L.). Plant Cell Rep 17:799–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen C, Hou X, Zhang H, Wang G, Tian L (2011) Induction of Anthurium andraeanum ‘‘Arizona’’ tetraploid by colchicine in vitro. Euphytica 181:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhawan OP, Lavania UC (1996) Enhancing the productivity of secondary metabolites via induced polyploidy: a review. Euphytica 87(2):81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickison WC (1974) Trichomes. In: Radford AE, Dickison WC, Massey JR, Bell CR (eds) Vascular plant systematics. Harper and row, New York, pp. 198–202. Oxford, pp 40–53Google Scholar
  11. Dijkstra H, Speckmann GJ (1980) Autotetraploidy in caraway (Carum carvi L.) for the increase of the aetheric oil content of the seed. Euphytica 29(1):89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ElSohly MA, Slade D (2005) Chemical constituents of marijuana: the complex mixture of natural cannabinoids. Life Sci 78:539–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao SL, Zhu DN, Cai ZH, Xu DR (1996) Autotetraploid plants from colchicine treated bud culture of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 47:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grange S, Leskovar DI, Pike LM, Cobb BG (2003) J Am Soc Hort Sci 128:253–259Google Scholar
  15. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation, 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Griesbach RJ, Bhat RN (1990) Colchicine-induced polyploidy in Eustoma grandiflorum. J Hort Sci 25:1284–1286Google Scholar
  17. Gu XF, Yang AF, Meng H, Zhang JR (2005) In vitro induction of tetraploid plants from diploid Zizyphus jujuba Mill. cv. Zhanhua. Plant Cell Rep 24:671–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamill SD, Smith MK, Dodd WA (1992) In vitro Induction of banana autotetraploids by colchicine treatment of micropropagated diploids. Aust J Botany 40:887–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haslam E (1986) Secondary metabolism-Fact or fiction. Nat Prod Rep 3:217–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hull-Sanders HM, Johnson RH, Owen HA, Meyer GA (2009) Effects of polyploidy on secondary chemistry, physiology, and performance of native and invasive genotypes of Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 96:762–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ (2008) Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320:481–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li HL (1973) An archaeological and historical account of Cannabis in China. Econ Bot 28:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu G, Li Z, Bao M (2007) Colchicine-nduced chromosome doubling in Platanus acerifolia and its effect on plant morphology. Euphytica 157:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loureiro J, Pinto G, Lopes T, Dolezel C, Santos C (2005) Assessment of ploidy stability of somatic embryogenesis process in Quercus suber L. using flow cytometry. Planta 221:815–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Madon M, Clyde MM, Hashim H, Mohd Yusuf Y, Mat H, Saratha S (2005) Polyploidy induction of oil palm through colchicine and oryzalin treatments. J Oil Palm Res 17:110–123Google Scholar
  26. Majdi M, Karimzadeh G, Omidbaigi R (2010) Induction of tetraploidy to Feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium Schulz-Bip.): morphological, physiological, cytological, and phytochemical Changes. J Hort Sci 45:16–21Google Scholar
  27. Mansouri H, Rohani M (2014) Response of Cannabis sativa L. To foliar application of 2-chloroethyltrimethylammoniumchoride. Iran. J Plant Physiol 6(1):1225–1234Google Scholar
  28. Mansouri H, Asrar Z, Mehrabani M (2009) Effect of gibberellic acid on primary terpenoids and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in Cannabis sativa at flowering stage. J Int Plant Biol 51(6):553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mehmedic Z, Chandra S, Slade D, Denham H, Foster S, Patel AS, Ross SA, Khan IA, ElSohly MA (2010) Potency trends of Δ9-THC and other cannabinoids in confiscated Cannabis preparations from 1993 to 2008. J Forensic Sci 55:1209–1710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ming R, Bendahmane A, Renner SS (2011) Sex chromosomes in land plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62:485–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakano MT, Nomizu K, Mizunashi M, Suzuki S, Mori S, Kuwayama M, Hayashi H, Umehara E, Kobayashi H, Asano M, Sugawara S, Takagi H, Saito H, Nakata M, Godo T, Hara Y, Amano J (2006) Somaclonal variation in Tricyrtis hirta plants regenerated from 1-year-old embryogenic callus cultures. J Hort Sci 110:366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ortiz R, Vuylsteke D (1995) Factors in Sequencing seed set in triploid Musa spp. L. and production of euploid hybrids. Ann Bot 75:151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Otto F (1990) DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In: Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman H (eds) Methods in cell biology, vol 33., Academic PressNew York, USA, pp 105–110Google Scholar
  34. Otto SP, Whitton J (2000) Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu Rev Genet 34:401–437CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramsey J, Schemske DW (1998) Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:467–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ranney TG (2006) Polyploidy: From evolution to new plant development. Combined Proc Int Plant Propagators’ Soc 56:137–142Google Scholar
  37. Roe JH (1955) The determination of sugar in blood and spinal fluid with anthrone reagent. J Biol Chem 212(1):335–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Russo EB, Jiang HE, Li X, Sutton A, Carboni A, Bianco F, Mandolino G, Potter DJ, Zhao YX, Bera S, Zhang YB, Lü E-G, Ferguson DK, Hueber F, Zhao LC, Liu CJ, Wang YF, Schultes RE, Klein WM, Plowman T, Lockwood TE (1974) Cannabis: an example of taxonomic neglect. Bot Mus Leaf Harvard Univ 23:337–367Google Scholar
  39. Rustichelli C, Ferioli V, Vezzalini F, Rossi MC, Gamberini G (1996) Simultaneous separation and identification of hashish constituents by coupled liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Chromatographia 43(3–4):129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schultes RE, Klein WM, Plowman T, Lockwood TE (1974) Cannabis: an example of taxonomic neglect. Harvard Univ. Bot. Mus. Leafl. 23:337–367Google Scholar
  41. Seigler DS (1998) Plant secondary metabolism. Originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4615-4913-0 (eBook)Google Scholar
  42. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Tate JA (2003) Advances in the study of polyploidy since plant speciation. New Phytol 161:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Song C, Liu S, Xiao J, He W, Zhou Y, Qin QB, Zhang C, Liu Y (2012) Polyploid organisms. Sci China. 55(4):301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thao NTP, Ureshino K, Miyajima I, Ozaki Y, Okubo H (2003) Induction of tetraploids in ornamental Alocasia through colchicine and oryzalin treatments. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 72:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Treier UA, Broennimann O, Normand S, Guisan A, Schaffner U, Steinger T, Müller-Schärer H (2009) Shift in cytotype frequency and niche space in the invasive plant Centaurea maculosa. Ecology 90(5):1366–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Verpoort R (1999) Bioassay methods in natural product research and drug development © Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 11–23Google Scholar
  47. Xu L, Najeeb U, Ms Naeem, Mk Daud, Cao JS, Gong HJ, Shen WQ, Zhou WJ (2010) Induction of tetraploidy in Juncus effusus by colchicine. Biol Planta 54:659–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zias J, Stark H, Sellgman J, Levy R, Werker E, Breuer A, Mechoulam R (1993) Early medical use of Cannabis. Nature 363:215PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceShahih Bahonar University of KermanKermanIran

Personalised recommendations