Abstract
The present article compares the stance styles in the two speeches addressed to the Arab World by US Presidents George W. Bush in Abu Dhabi in 2008 and Barack Obama in Cairo in 2009. The main theoretical concepts addressed are stance and recontextualization. Halliday’s (An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. Arnold, London, 1994) model of stance is adopted in the present study to establish stance categories and degrees of subjectivity. Additionally, co-occurrence with personal pronouns and negation is explored. Corpus methodology and discourse pragmatic analysis are used in combination. The main claim is that the higher frequency of markers of stance in Obama’s speech, in particular modal verbs and negation and their co-occurrence with first person pronouns, evokes intertextually his predecessor’s speech and stance towards the Arab World, together with commonly held assumptions about the relations between the US and the Arab World. Results show significant differences in the choice and frequency of markers of modality and negation and their co-occurrence with personal pronouns in the two speeches. A different stance style characterizes each speech, with an effort in Obama’s speech to recontextualize and reformulate the predominant discourse and social practice in US foreign policy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1935 [1981]). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed. and C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11, 1–34.
Boyd, W. (2014a). (New) participatory framework on YouTube? Commenter interaction in US political speeches. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 46–58.
Boyd, W. (2014b). Participation and recontextualisation in New Media Political Discourse Analysis and YouTube. In B. Kaal, I. Maks, & A. van Elfrinkhof (Eds.), From text to political positions text analysis across disciplines (pp. 245–268). John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Bush, G. Jr. (2008). Address in Abu Dhabi on ‘Freedom and Extremism in the Middle East’. Accessed at http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/gwbushabudhabi.htm
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave/MacMillan: Basingstoke.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005/2011). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave/MacMillan: Basingstoke.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Englebretson, R. (Ed.). (2007). Stancetaking in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans, V., & Chilton, P. (Eds.). (2010). Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox Publishing.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Fetzer, A. (Ed.). (2013). The pragmatics of political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, T. (1993). English grammar: A function-based introduction, I & II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
Hidalgo Downing, L. (2014). The role of modal-negative synergies in Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 259–279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hidalgo Downing, L., & Núñez-Perucha, B. (2013). Modality and personal pronouns as indexical markers of stance: Intersubjective positioning and construction of public identity in media interviews. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (pp. 379–410). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Jordan, M. (1998). The power of negation: Text, context and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(6), 705–752.
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2015). Epistemicity and stance: A cross-linguistic study of epistemic stance strategies in journalistic discourse in English and Spanish. Discourse Studies, 17(2), 210–225.
Marín-Arrese, J. I., Carretero, M., Arús Hita, J., & van der Auwera, J. (Eds.). (2013). English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave.
Obama, B. (2009). Address in Cairo on ‘A new beginning’. Accessed at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/us/politics/04obama.text.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Rayson, P. (2008). WMatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Lancaster: Computing Department, Lancaster University. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/matrix
Shakespeare, W. (1991). Julius Caesar. Dover drift editions.
Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 41–59.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M., & Aijmer, K. (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty. A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.
Thompson, G., & Alba-Juez, L. (Eds.). (2014). Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking. Oxford/Cambridge MA: Basil Blackwell.
Acknowledgements
This study has been carried out as part of the research work of two research projects, the first one funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (FFI-2008-01471FILO), and the second one funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FFI-201-30790) to whom we are grateful.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hidalgo-Downing, L., Hanawi, Y. (2017). Bush and Obama’s Addresses to the Arab World: Recontextualizing Stance in Political Discourse. In: Aijmer, K., Lewis, D. (eds) Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54556-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54556-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54554-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54556-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)