Skip to main content

Bush and Obama’s Addresses to the Arab World: Recontextualizing Stance in Political Discourse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics ((YCLP,volume 5))

Abstract

The present article compares the stance styles in the two speeches addressed to the Arab World by US Presidents George W. Bush in Abu Dhabi in 2008 and Barack Obama in Cairo in 2009. The main theoretical concepts addressed are stance and recontextualization. Halliday’s (An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. Arnold, London, 1994) model of stance is adopted in the present study to establish stance categories and degrees of subjectivity. Additionally, co-occurrence with personal pronouns and negation is explored. Corpus methodology and discourse pragmatic analysis are used in combination. The main claim is that the higher frequency of markers of stance in Obama’s speech, in particular modal verbs and negation and their co-occurrence with first person pronouns, evokes intertextually his predecessor’s speech and stance towards the Arab World, together with commonly held assumptions about the relations between the US and the Arab World. Results show significant differences in the choice and frequency of markers of modality and negation and their co-occurrence with personal pronouns in the two speeches. A different stance style characterizes each speech, with an effort in Obama’s speech to recontextualize and reformulate the predominant discourse and social practice in US foreign policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1935 [1981]). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed. and C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. (2014a). (New) participatory framework on YouTube? Commenter interaction in US political speeches. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. (2014b). Participation and recontextualisation in New Media Political Discourse Analysis and YouTube. In B. Kaal, I. Maks, & A. van Elfrinkhof (Eds.), From text to political positions text analysis across disciplines (pp. 245–268). John Benjamins: Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G. Jr. (2008). Address in Abu Dhabi on ‘Freedom and Extremism in the Middle East’. Accessed at http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/gwbushabudhabi.htm

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave/MacMillan: Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2005/2011). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave/MacMillan: Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Englebretson, R. (Ed.). (2007). Stancetaking in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, V., & Chilton, P. (Eds.). (2010). Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, A. (Ed.). (2013). The pragmatics of political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, T. (1993). English grammar: A function-based introduction, I & II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo Downing, L. (2014). The role of modal-negative synergies in Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 259–279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo Downing, L., & Núñez-Perucha, B. (2013). Modality and personal pronouns as indexical markers of stance: Intersubjective positioning and construction of public identity in media interviews. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (pp. 379–410). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, M. (1998). The power of negation: Text, context and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(6), 705–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2015). Epistemicity and stance: A cross-linguistic study of epistemic stance strategies in journalistic discourse in English and Spanish. Discourse Studies, 17(2), 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín-Arrese, J. I., Carretero, M., Arús Hita, J., & van der Auwera, J. (Eds.). (2013). English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2009). Address in Cairo on ‘A new beginning’. Accessed at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/us/politics/04obama.text.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

  • Rayson, P. (2008). WMatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Lancaster: Computing Department, Lancaster University. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/matrix

  • Shakespeare, W. (1991). Julius Caesar. Dover drift editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M., & Aijmer, K. (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty. A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., & Alba-Juez, L. (Eds.). (2014). Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking. Oxford/Cambridge MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been carried out as part of the research work of two research projects, the first one funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (FFI-2008-01471FILO), and the second one funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FFI-201-30790) to whom we are grateful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Hidalgo-Downing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hidalgo-Downing, L., Hanawi, Y. (2017). Bush and Obama’s Addresses to the Arab World: Recontextualizing Stance in Political Discourse. In: Aijmer, K., Lewis, D. (eds) Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54556-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54556-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54554-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54556-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics