Skip to main content

Solid: A Model to Analyse the Accessibility of Transport Systems for Visually Impaired People

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

A model has been developed to analyse the basic requirements and tasks involved to ensure that optimum solutions to guarantee accessibility to public spaces are possible for all types of user in any situation. This model, called SOLID, adopts a systematic approach which was developed originally for applications for the blind and visually impaired persons (VIPs) in public transport, but can also be applied to analyse accessibility in many other situations. In the context of transportation systems it enables us to identify the essential tasks, requirements, and information needed at each stage of the chain of displacements. SOLID is an acronym for the initial letters of the five essential elements of the model, which are Safety , Orientation , Localisation , Information and Displacement . Ensuring maximum safety and security for all users in all circumstances and all phases of the journey is of course the primary function of the transport operator. The efficiency of the design of the infrastructure and systems put in place to provide a safe environment and satisfactory accessibility for all depends on the success of optimising the principles of inclusion and removing barriers at all stages of the journey including, the man machine interfaces and the modes of communication and guidance to cater to the physical and cognitive capacities of all users. Orientation, localisation and access to information are particularly important for the visually impaired to enable them to complete their journey safely. A perfect solution is, of course, difficult to achieve when redesigning transport systems that may have been originally designed more than a hundred years ago and which are often affected by an unfavourable local environment and multiple technical constraints, due to historical, structural, functional and economic factors, particularly in the case of metro or underground systems. In circumstances where older existing transport systems are being updated to comply with the new European regulations on accessibility coming into force, it is sometimes easier to propose alternative transport solutions, but much can still be done to improve accessibility in existing systems. The advantages of using this model are illustrated by the analysis of real problems and solutions applied in metro and train stations for blind and visually impaired users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH), based on the work of Philip Green. Geneva WHO 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) WHO 2001

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pretorius S, Baudoin G, Venard O (2010) “Real time information for visual and auditory impaired passengers using public transport—technical aspects of the Infomoville project” Handicap 2010. IFRATH, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  4. Uzan G, Wagstaff PR (2011) A model and methods to solve problems of accessibility and information for the visually impaired. STHESCA, Krakow

    Google Scholar 

  5. Uzan G, Seck M, Wagstaff PR, Dejeammes M (2011) Solid: A model of the principles, processes and information required to ensure mobility for all in public transport systems. In: Invited presentation 18th international conference on intelligent transport systems, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uzan G, Hanse P-C, Seck M, Wagstaff P (2015) Solid: a model of the principles, processes and information required to ensure mobility for all in public transport systems. In: Proceedings 19th triennial congress of the IEA, Melbourne, 9–14 Aug 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bestaven E, Guillaud E, Cazalets J-R (2012) Is “Circling” behavior in humans related to postural asymmetry? PLoS ONE 7(9):e43861. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. National Standards Japan JIS T 9251:2001 Dimensions and patterns of raised of parts of tactile ground surface indicators for blind persons

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dejeammes M, Piriou C-N, Leclère D (2005) Usage des surfaces podotactiles par les personnes aveugles ou malvoyantes, Publication of the CERTU. ISBN: 2–11-095322-5, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kurachi K, Kitikazi S, Fujishima Y, Watanabe N, Kamato M (2005) Integrated pedestrian guidance system using mobile device. In: 12th world congress on ITS, 6–10 Nov 2005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marin-Lamellet C, Aymond P (2008) Combining verbal information and a tactile guidance surface: the most efficient way to guide people with visual impairment in transport stations. Br J Visual Impairment 26(1):63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DfT (Department for Transport) (2007) Guidance on the use of tactile paving surfaces. DfT, London, UK. See http://www.dft.gov.uk/publications/guidance-on-the-use-oftactile-paving-surfaces

  13. Bentzen BL, Barlow JM, Tabor LS (2000) Detectable warnings: synthesis of U.S. and international practice. U.S. Access Board, Washington, DC 20004-1111, (http://www.access-board.gov) Work performed under contract by: Accessible Design for the Blind, Berlin, Massachusetts 01503 USA, 12 May 2000

  14. Childs CR, Thomas C, Sharp S, Tyler NA (2010) Can shared surfaces be safely negotiated by blind and partially sighted people? The 12th international conference on mobility and transport for elderly and disabled persons (TRANSED), Hong Kong, China

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norgate SH (2012) Accessibility of urban spaces for visually impaired pedestrians. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers, vol 165, issue ME4, Municipal Engineer, pp 231–237

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton-Baillie B (2008) Towards shared space. Urban Design Int 13(2):130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenness JW, Singer J (2008) Visibility and conspicuity of detectable warnings for pedestrians with visual impairments. Transp Res Rec 2073(104–113):2008

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson V, Petrie H (1998) Travelling safely: the problems and concerns of blind pedestrians. Br J Visual Impairment 16(1):27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the RATP, the SNCF, TCL and numerous partners from other institutions that have collaborated in the projects, which have contributed to the development and validation of the ideas presented in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Wagstaff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uzan, G., Wagstaff, P. (2018). Solid: A Model to Analyse the Accessibility of Transport Systems for Visually Impaired People. In: Pissaloux, E., Velazquez, R. (eds) Mobility of Visually Impaired People. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54446-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54446-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54444-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54446-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics