Identification of Complex Nonlinearities Using Cubic Splines with Automatic Discretization

Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

One of the major challenges in nonlinear system identification is the selection of appropriate mathematical functions to model the observed nonlinearities. In this context, piecewise polynomials, or splines, offer a simple and flexible representation basis requiring limited prior knowledge. The generally-adopted discretization for splines consists in an even distribution of their control points, termed knots. While this may prove successful for simple nonlinearities, a more advanced strategy is needed for nonlinear restoring forces with strong local variations. The present paper specifically introduces a two-step methodology to select automatically the location of the knots. It proposes to derive an initial model, using nonlinear subspace identification, and incorporating cubic spline basis functions with fixed and equally-spaced abscissas. In a second step, the location of the knots is optimized iteratively by minimizing a least-squares cost function. A single-degree-of-freedom system with a discontinuous stiffness characteristic is considered as a case study.

Keywords

Nonlinear system identification Frequency-domain subspace algorithm Cubic splines Nonsmooth nonlinearity Automatic splines discretization Constrained nonlinear optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors T. Dossogne and J.P. Noël are Research Fellow (FRIA fellowship) and Postdoctoral Researcher, respectively, of the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique FNRS which is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Kerschen, G., Worden, K., Vakakis, A.F., Golinval, J.C.: Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 20, 505–592 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noël, J.P., Schoukens, J., Kerschen, G.: Grey-box nonlinear state-space modelling for mechanical vibrations identification. In: Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Beijing (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noël, J.-P., Kerschen, G., Foltête, E., Cogan, S.: Grey-box identification of a nonlinear solar array structure using cubic splines. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 67, 106–119 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dempsey, E.J., Westwick, D.T.: Identification of Hammerstein models with cubic spline nonlinearities. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51, 237–245 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Noël, J.P., Kerschen, G.: Nonparametric subspace identification of nonlinear structures - application to a spacecraft. In: 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Boston (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noël, J.-P., Kerschen, G.: Frequency-domain subspace identification for nonlinear mechanical systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 40, 701–717 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boggs, P.T., Tolle, J.W.: Sequential quadratic programming. Acta Numer. 4, 1–51 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pintelon, R., Schoukens, J.: System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Space Structures and Systems Lab, Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations