Advertisement

Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Railway Vehicle Models Using Linearized Proxy Analyses

  • J. Larivière
  • S. Cogan
  • P. L. Green
  • E. Foltête
  • G. Ham-Livet
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Virtual prototyping can facilitate the design and certification of railway vehicles with the aim of ensuring passenger comfort and safety. Sensitivity analysis (SA) has proven to be an essential tool for ranking the most influential model parameters in order to effectively reduce the design space before implementing costly model selection procedures, for example design optimization, model calibration, or enhancement of critical component models. Meanwhile, the computational burden of performing global sensitivity analysis on the nonlinear transient simulations used in the railway industry can prove challenging. The present work investigates the potential of replacing these nonlinear simulations by a series of proxy modal analyses performed at different linearization points in the design space. The methodology is illustrated using the Morris design sensitivity method on an academic system: a two degree of freedom (DOF) system with a nonlinear stiffness. Results of a complete nonlinear sensitivity analysis are compared with the results based on the proxy linearized analyses.

Keywords

Railway vehicles Sensitivity analysis Non-linearity Time cost Linearization 

References

  1. 1.
    Saltelli, A., Chan, K., Scott, E.M.: Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley, New York (2008)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Funfschilling, C., Bezin, Y., Sebès, M.: DynoTRAIN: introduction of simulation in the certification process of railway vehicles. In: Proceedings of the Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraft, S., Puel, G., Aubry, D., Funfschilling, C.: Improved calibration of simulation models in railway dynamics: application of a parameter identification process to the multi-body model of a TGV train. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 51 (12), 1938–1960 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morris, M.D.: Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33 (2), 161–174 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Saltelli, A.: An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ. Model Softw. 22 (10), 1509–1518 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Larivière
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Cogan
    • 1
  • P. L. Green
    • 3
  • E. Foltête
    • 1
  • G. Ham-Livet
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsUniversity of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, FEMTO-ST Institute, CNRS/UFC/ENSMM/UTBMBESANÇONFrance
  2. 2.Alstom Le CreusotLe CreusotFrance
  3. 3.Institute for Risk and UncertaintyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations