Nonlinear Normal Modes of a Curved Beam and Its Response to Random Loading

Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Hypersonic vehicles are exposed to high amplitude, random, broadband loading and so, in order to predict the life of the system, the geometrically nonlinear response of certain skin panels must be computed for a long time duration. This is a costly procedure when using the finite element (FE) method due to large mesh sizes and small time step requirements. Nonlinear Reduced Order Models (NLROMs) provide an accurate and computationally efficient alternative to compute the response of such structures. The NLROMs still require computationally expensive validation that is conventionally done by comparing responses with the full FE model. An alternative approach to validating NLROMs is to compute their Nonlinear Normal Modes (NNMs), which are independent of the loading scenario and provide information regarding the system’s response over a range of energy or response amplitude. This work investigates the relationship between the NNMs and response of a curved beam to random inputs. The structure contains quadratic and cubic nonlinearities that produce both a softening and hardening behavior of the beam as the system energy is increased. A connection is made between the accuracy of NNMs computed from NLROMs and their random response predictions.

Keywords

Reduced order modeling Geometric nonlinearities Nonlinear normal modes Finite element analysis Structural dynamics 

References

  1. 1.
    Gordon, R., Hollkamp, J.: Reduced-order models for acoustic response prediction. Technical Report, Air Force Research Laboratory (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schoneman, J.D., Allen, M.S.: Leveraging geometric nonnonlinear for efficient design of thin beams. In: 6th International Conference on Nonlinear Vibrations, Localization and Energy Transfer (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, X., Mignolet, M., Eason, T., Spottswood, S.: Nonlinear reduced order modeling of curved beams: a comparison of methods. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hollkamp, J.J., Gordon, R.W., Spottswood, S.M.: Nonlinear modal models for sonic fatigue response prediction: a comparison of methods. J. Sound Vib. 284, 3–5 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordon, R.W., Hollkamp, J.J.: Reduced-order modeling of the random response of curved beams using implicit condensation. In: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Przekop, A., Rizzi, S.A.: Dynamic snap-through of thin-walled structures by a reduced-order method. AIAA J. 45 (10), 2510–2519 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perez, R., Wang, X.Q., Mignolet, M.P.: Nonintrusive structural dynamic reduced order modeling for large deformations: enhancements for complex structures. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 9 (3), 031008 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuether, R., Deaner, B., Hollkamp, J., Allen, M.: Evaluation of geometrically nonlinear reduced-order models with nonlinear normal modes. AIAA J. 53, 3273–3285 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuether, R., Allen, M.: Validation of nonlinear reduced order models with time integration targeted at nonlinear normal modes. In: Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 1. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Damme, C.V., Allen, M.: Using nnms to evaluate reduced order models of curved beam. In: Rotating Machinery, Hybrid Test Methods, Vibro-Acoustics and Laser Vibrometry, vol. 8. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, pp. 457–469 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schoneman, J., Allen, M., Kuether, R.: Relationships between nonlinear normal modes and response to random inputs. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 84, 184–199 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar, P., Narayanan, S.: Modified path integral solution of Fokker-Planck equation: response and bifurcation of nonlinear systems. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 5 (1), 011004 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosenberg, R.M.: Normal modes of nonlinear dual-mode systems. J. Appl. Mech. 27, 263–268 (1960)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kerschen, G., Peeters, M., Vakakis, A., Golinval, J.C.: Nonlinear normal modes, part I: a useful framework for the structural dynamicist. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23 (1), 170–194 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peeters, M., Virguie, R., Serandour, G., Kerschen, G.: Nonlinear normal modes, part II: toward a practical computation using numerical continuation techniques. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23 (1), 195–216 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spelman, G.M., Langley, R.S.: Statistical energy analysis of nonlinear vibrating systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140400 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering PhysicsUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations