Abstract
Behavior modification programs have been used in corrections as a management tool as well as a treatment modality. Although there are many variations, the basic principle is grounded in costs and rewards. Regardless of the situation, behavior that is considered good is rewarded, and behavior that is considered bad is punished in some way. Children who do well in school are rewarded by being listed on the honor roll and receiving praise and perhaps some material reward from parents. The positive experience serves as a reinforcement to continue the behavior that led to the good grades. In corrections, offenders placed on community supervision who conform to the rules of probation are rewarded by being released from probation at the time scheduled. If they do not conform to the rules, they might be punished by having their probation revoked and being sent to prison. In the community residential and institutional settings, residents placed in a behavior modification program are rewarded for good behavior by receiving more privileges, by being released at an earlier time than scheduled, and by knowing they have accomplished something personal such as achieving an improved self-image or having developed work skills.
In this chapter, several variations in the basic behavior modification model are considered, and their application in both community settings and residential settings are illustrated. In addition, several of the legal and moral issues related to behavior modification programs in which extreme methods were used are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, R. (2000). Counseling, treatment and intervention: Methods with juvenile and adult offenders. Santa Barbara, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Aumilier, G. (2016). Police psychology/The schedule is the key (pp. 1–5). New York: Marworth. Retrieved August 25, 2016, from http://www.policepsychologyblog.com/?tag+police-stress.
Brown, B., Wienckowski, L., & Stolz, S. (1976). Behavior modification: Perspectives on a current issue. Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, U.S. Government Printing Office. (Reprinted in Correctional counseling and treatment, 5th ed., pp. 367–404, by P. Kratcoski, 2004, Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.)
Burton, V., Marquart, W., Cuvelier, S., Malarid, F., & Hunter, R. (1993). A study of attitudinal change among boot camp participants. Federal Probation, 57(3), 46.
Carter, M., & Sankovitz, R. (2014). Dosage probation: Rethinking the structure of probation sentences. Silver Springs, MD: Center for Effective Public Policy.
Cherry, K. (2016). What is operant conditioning and how does it work? Psychology, Very Well. Retrieved August 28, 2016, from https://www.verywell.com/operant-conditioning-a2-2794863
Duriez, S., Cullen, F., & Manchak, S. (2014). Is project HOPE creating a false sense of hope? A case study in correctional popularity. Federal Probation, 78, 57–70.
Hengesh, D. (1991). Think of boot camps as a foundation for change, not as an instant cure. Corrections Today, 53(6), 106–108.
Kratcoski, P. (2012). Juvenile justice administration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
Kratcoski, P., & Kratcoski, L. (1990). Juvenile delinquency (3rd ed.). Upper-Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kratcoski, P., & Kratcoski, L. (2004). Juvenile delinquency (5th ed.). Upper-Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lindsley, O., & Skinner, B. (1954). A method for the experimental analysis of behavior of psychotic patients. American Psychologist, 9, 419–420.
Roberson, C., Lowenkamp, M., Lowenkamp, C., & Lowenkamp, M. (2015). Toward an empirical and theoretical understanding of offender reinforcement and punishment. Federal Probation, 79, 3–10.
Rutherford, R. (1975). Establishing behavior contracts with delinquent adolescents. Federal Probation, 39(1), 28–32.
Sedlak, A., & McPherson, J. (2010). Conditions of confinement: Findings from the survey of youth in residential placement (OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Wodahl, E., Garland, B., Culhane, S., & McCarty, W. (2011). Utilizing behavioral interventions to improve supervision outcomes in community based corrections. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 386–405.
Zajac, G., Lattimore, P., Dawes, D., & Winger, L. (2015). All implementation is local: Initial findings from the process evaluations of the Honest Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) demonstration field experiment. Federal Probation, 79, 31–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kratcoski, P.C. (2017). Behavior Modification Programs Used in Corrections. In: Correctional Counseling and Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54349-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54349-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54348-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54349-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)