Advertisement

Byron's Nature pp 155-202 | Cite as

Metaphysical Plays of Domination and Freedom

  • J. Andrew Hubbell
Chapter

Abstract

The metaphysical plays allow Byron a chance to stage the dominant epistemology of hierarchical dualism and speculate about its psychosocial effects. Manfred, Cain, and Japhet all occupy worlds that have been structured by dualism. Manfred and Cain have both internalized dualistic epistemology which teaches them to despise their “mixed essence” of mind-body. Through the course of their dramas, both protagonists come to understand the power of human vulnerability and value the shared fragility that connects them to the earth. In contrast, Japhet already understands how shared fragility unites all living creatures in co-creating a highly diversified, self-determining world. He becomes the sole witness to God’s ecocide, the Flood, which reorganizes creation in a starkly dualistic hierarchy.

References

  1. Barrow, Mark V., Jr. Nature’s Ghosts: Confronting Extinction from the Age of Jefferson to the Age of Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Barsky, Robert. “Byron and Catastrophism: A Reading of “Heaven and Hell”.” Discours Social, 1988: 109–125.Google Scholar
  3. Beaty, Bernard. “Fiction’s Limit and Eden’s Door.” In Byron and the Limits of Fiction, ed. Bernard Beaty and Vincent Newey. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  5. Bookchin, Murray. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Oakland, CA: A. K. Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  6. Bostetter, Edward E. The Romantic Ventriloquists: Wordsworth, Coleridge, Keats, Shelley, Byron. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  7. Cantor, Paul. “Byron’s Cain: A Romantic Version of the Fall.” Kenyon Review 2, no. 3 (1980): 50–71.Google Scholar
  8. Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.Google Scholar
  9. Cheeke, Stephen. Byron and Place: History, Translation, Nostalgia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Clubbe, John. “The New Prometheus of New Men’: Byron’s 1816 Poems and Manfred.” In Nineteenth Century Literary Perspectives: Essays in Honor of Lionel Stevenson, ed. Clyde de L. Ryals, 17–47. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. Cooke, Michael G. The Blind Man Traces the Circle: On the Patterns and Philosophy of Byron’s Poetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  12. Dingley, Robert. “Byron and the Coliseum: The Art of Recycling.” Byron Journal 33, no. 1 (2005): 25–35.Google Scholar
  13. England, Anthony B. “Byron and the Emergence of Japhet in Heaven and Earth.” English Studies in Canada 21, no. 4 (December 1995): 433–455.Google Scholar
  14. Francis, Leslie, P. “Reciprocity and Environmental Obligations.” Hofstra Law Review 37 (2009): 1007–1014.Google Scholar
  15. Franklin, Carolyn. Byron’s Heroines. Oxford: Clarendon University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Gillispie, Charles Coulston. Genesis and Geology: A Study in the Relations of Scientific Thought, Natural Theology, and Social Opinion in Great Britain, 1790–1850. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  18. Gleckner, Robert F. Byron and the Ruins of Paradise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, Donna. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  20. Hirst, Wolf Z. “Byron’s Lapse into Orthodoxy: An Unorthodox Reading of Cain.” In The Plays of Lord Byron: Critical Essays, eds. Robert Gleckner and Bernard Beatty, 251–272. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  21. Hirst, Wolf Z. “My Brother’s Keeper: The Biblical Heritage in Byron’s Cain.” In Byron: Heritage and Legacy, ed. Cheryl A. Wilson, 83–92. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Howe, Anthony. Byron and the Forms of Thought. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Jackson, Emily A. Bernhard. The Development of Byron’s Philosophy of Knowledge: Certainty in Uncertainty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
  24. Karkoulis, Dimitri. “`They pluck’d the tree of Science / And sin’: Byron’s Cain and the Science of Sacrilege.” European Romantic Review, 2007: 273–281.Google Scholar
  25. Kenyon-Jones, Christine. Kindred Brutes: Animals in Romantic-Period Writing. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. Kroeber, Karl. Ecological Literary Criticism: Romantic Imagining and the Biology of Mind. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. Latour, Bruno. “Will Non-Humans Be Saved?: An Argument in Ecotheology.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15 (2009): 459–475.Google Scholar
  29. Lord Byron, George Gordon. Byron’s Letters and Journals, ed. Leslie A. Marchand. 12 vols. London: John Murray, 1973.Google Scholar
  30. ———. Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, eds. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller. Vol. 6. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  31. ———. Oxford World Classics: Lord Byron, The Major Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  32. Lovell, Ernest J. Byron: the Record of a Quest; Studies in the Poet’s Concept and Treatment of Nature,. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  33. McGann, Jerome. “Byron and Wordsworth.” In Byron and Romanticism, ed. James Soderholm, 173–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  34. McGann, Jerome J., and Murray Roston. “Orthodoxy and Unorthodoxy in Heaven and Earth.” In The Plays of Lord Byron: Critical Essays, eds. Robert Gleckner and Bernard Beatty, 291–300. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  35. McVeigh, Daniel M. “Manfred’s Curse.” Studies in English Literature, 1982: 610–612.Google Scholar
  36. Melaney, William D. “Ambiguous Difference: Ethical Concern in Byron’s Manfred.” New Literary History 36, no. 3 (2005): 461–475.Google Scholar
  37. Morton, Timothy. “Byron’s Manfred and Ecocriticism.” In Palgrave Advances in Byron Studies, ed. Jane Stabler, 155–170. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.Google Scholar
  38. Oelschlaeger, Max. The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  39. Pafford, Ward. “Byron and the Mind of Man: Childe Harold III–IV and Manfred.” Studies in Romanticism 1 (1962): 105–127.Google Scholar
  40. Paley, Morton D. Apocalypse and Millennium in English Romantic Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  41. Plumwood, Val. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  42. Rawes, Alan. “1816–17: Childe Harold III and Manfred.” In The Cambridge Companion to Byron, ed. Drummond Bone, 118–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  43. Rawes, Alan. “Byron’s Romantic Calvinism.” Byron Journal 40, no. 2 (2012): 129–141.Google Scholar
  44. ———. Byron’s Poetic Experimentation: Childe Harold, the Tales, and the Quest for Comedy. London: Ashgate Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar
  45. Richardson, Alan. “On the Borders of Heaven and Earth.” In The Plays of Lord Byron, eds. Robert Gleckner and Bernard Beatty, 301–320. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  46. Robinson, Charles. Shelley and Byron: The Snake and Eagle Wreathed in Fight. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  47. Rudwick, Martin J. S. Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  48. Ryan, Robert M. The Romantic Reformation: Religious Politics in English Literature, 1789–1824. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  49. Serenella, Iovino, and Serpil Oppermann. “Material Ecocriticism: Materiality, Agency, and Models of Narrativity.” Ecozone, 2012: 75–91.Google Scholar
  50. Sperry, Stuart M. “Byron and the Meaning of Manfred.” Criticism 16 (1974): 189–202.Google Scholar
  51. Steffan, Truman Guy. Lord Byron’s Cain: Twelve Essays and a Text with Variants and Annotations. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  52. Thorselv, Peter L. The Byronic Hero: Types and Prototypes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  53. Twitchell, James. “The Supernatural Structure of Byron’s Manfred.” Studies in English Literature 15, no. 4 (1975): 601–614.Google Scholar
  54. Williams, Raymond. “Ideas of Nature.” In Culture and Materialism: Selected Essays, ed. Raymond Williams, 67–85. New York: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
  55. Wu, Duncan, ed. Romanticism: An Anthology. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
  56. Young, Davis A. The Biblical Flood: A Case Study of the Church’s Response to Extrabiblical Evidence. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Susquehanna UniversitySelinsgroveUSA

Personalised recommendations