Skip to main content

Possibilities and Limits of Traditional Performance Appraisals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The End of Performance Appraisal

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 2724 Accesses

Abstract

Does the annual performance appraisal help us understand each individual employee’s and entire teams’ needs for learning in an agile environment? Can managers in a hierarchical world identify their employees’ potentials? Are managers in these systems even the right authorities? Do goals also serve as motivation when employee tasks involve a high degree of process and results certainty? These are the sorts of questions which will be addressed in this chapter. The collective, central issue revolves around the notion of: For which types of benefits can the annual performance appraisal act as a suitable instrument in its traditional form? We will be looking at different framework conditions here, as addressed in Chap. 3. This chapter will also suggest some alternatives which may help meet the conventional benefit requirements in agile and hierarchical worlds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bartlett, C. A., & McLean, A. N. (2006). GE’s Talent Machine: The making of a CEO. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (2003). Grundlagen betrieblicher Leistungsbeurteilungen. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberich, M. & Trost, A. (2012). Employee referral programs. BoD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, L. A., & Berger, D. R. (2005). Management wisdom from the New York Yankees’ dynasty: What every manager can learn from a legendary team’s 80-year winning streak. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breisig, T. (2005). Personalbeurteilung: Mitarbeitergespräche und Zielvereinbarungen regeln und gestalten. Bund-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, M., & Vosburgh, R. M. (2001). The 21st century human resources function: It’s the talent, stupid! Human Resource Planning, 24(4), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P. (2012). Why good people can’t get jobs. Wharton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A. (2010). Developing leadership talent: Delivering on the promise of structured programs. In R. Silzer & B. E. Dowell (Eds.), Strategy-driven talent management (pp. 281–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, B. E. (2010). Managing leadership talent pools. In R. Silzer & B. E. Dowell (Eds.), Strategy-driven talent management (pp. 399–438). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, R. M., & Conger, J. A. (2004). Growing your company’s leaders. How great organizations use succession management to sustain competitive advantage. New York, NY: Amacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubmann, E. L. (1998). The talent solution: Aligning strategy and people to achieve extraordinary results. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossiep, R., Bittner, J. E., & Berndt, W. (2008). Mitarbeitergespräche. Motivierend, wirksam, nachhaltig. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenewein, W., & Heidbrink, M. (2008). High-performance-teams: Die fünf Erfolgsprinzipien für Führung und Zusammenarbeit. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joch, W. (1992). Das sportliche Talent. Talenterkennung, Talentförderung, Talentperspektiven. Aachen: Meyer und Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations. Brussels: Nelson Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work. The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1984). Goal setting: A motivational technique that works! Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. W. (1998). High flyers: Developing the next generation of leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (1980). Rituelle (Selbst-) Täuschung. Kritik der irrationalen Praxis der Personalbeurteilung. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 1, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odiorne, G. S. (1965). Management by objectives. A system of managerial leadership. New York, NY: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfläging, N. (2014). Organize for complexity: How to get life back into work to build the high-performance organization. New York, NY: BetaCodex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J., & Edwards, L. (2009). Managing talent retention. An ROI approach. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, D. (2009). Drive. The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2009). The element. How finding your passion changes everything. New York, NY: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, W. J. (2005). Effective succession planning. Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within. New York, NY: Amacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silzer, R. F., & Church, A. H. (2009). The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C., & Johnson, H. L. (2011). The elements of scrum. Foster City, CA: DyPetericon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trost, A. (2014). Talent relationship management. Competitive recruiting strategies in times of talent shortage. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltz, F., & Ortmann, R. G. (1992). Das Softwareprojekt: Projektmanagement in der Praxis. Frankfurt/M: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trost, A. (2017). Possibilities and Limits of Traditional Performance Appraisals. In: The End of Performance Appraisal. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54235-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics