Advertisement

Learning with Ambiguous Label Distribution for Apparent Age Estimation

  • Ke ChenEmail author
  • Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10113)

Abstract

Annotating age classes for humans’ facial images according to their appearance is very challenging because of dynamic person-specific ageing pattern, and thus leads to a set of unreliable apparent age labels for each image. For utilising ambiguous label annotations, an intuitive strategy is to generate a pseudo age for each image, typically the average value of manually-annotated age annotations, which is thus fed into standard supervised learning frameworks designed for chronological age estimation. Alternatively, inspired by the recent success of label distribution learning, this paper introduces a novel concept of ambiguous label distribution for apparent age estimation, which is developed under the following observations that (1) soft labelling is beneficial for alleviating the suffering of inaccurate annotations and (2) more reliable annotations should contribute more. To achieve the goal, label distributions of sparse age annotations for each image are weighted according to their reliableness and then combined to construct an ambiguous label distribution. In the light, the proposed learning framework not only inherits the advantages from conventional learning with label distribution to capture latent label correlation but also exploits annotation reliableness to improve the robustness against inconsistent age annotations. Experimental evaluation on the FG-NET age estimation benchmark verifies its effectiveness and superior performance over the state-of-the-art frameworks for apparent age estimation.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by Academy of Finland under the Grant No. 267581 and 298700, and D2I SHOK project funded by Digile Oy and Nokia Technologies (Tampere, Finland). The authors wish to acknowledge CSC-IT Center for Science, Finland, for generous computational resources.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, K., Gong, S., Xiang, T., Loy, C.C.: Cumulative attribute space for age and crowd density estimation. In: CVPR (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fu, Y., Guo, G., Huang, T.S.: Age synthesis and estimation via faces: a survey. TPAMI 32(11), 1955–1976 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geng, X., Ji, R.: Label distribution learning. In: ICDMW (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geng, X., Yin, C., Zhou, Z.H.: Facial age estimation by learning from label distributions. TPAMI 35(10), 2401–2412 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luu, K., Ricanek Jr., K., Bui, T.D., Suen, C.Y.: Age estimation using active appearance models and support vector machine regression. In: BTAS (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pontes, J.K., Britto, A.S., Fookes, C., Koerich, A.L.: A flexible hierarchical approach for facial age estimation based on multiple features. Pattern Recogn. 54, 34–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, Y., Yeung, D.: Multi-tasks warped Gaussian process for personalized age estimation. In: CVPR (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han, H., Otto, C., Liu, X., Jain, A.K.: Demographic estimation from face images: human vs. machine performance. TPAMI 37(6), 1148–1161 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, X., Gao, B.B., Xing, C., Huo, Z.W., Wei, X.S., Zhou, Y., Wu, J., Geng, X.: Deep label distribution learning for apparent age estimation. In: CVPR Workshops (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rothe, R., Timofte, R., Gool, L.: DEX: deep expectation of apparent age from a single image. In: ICCV Workshops (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuang, Z., Huang, C., Zhang, W.: Deeply learned rich coding for cross-dataset facial age estimation. In: ICCV Workshops (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Mu, G., Guo, G.: A study on apparent age estimation. In: ICCV Workshops (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antipov, G., Baccouche, M., Berrani, S.A., Dugelay, J.L.: Apparent age estimation from face images combining general and children-specialized deep learning models. In: ICCV Workshops (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geng, X., Zhou, Z.H., Smith-Miles, K.: Automatic age estimation based on facial aging patterns. TPAMI 29(12), 2234–2240 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lanitis, A., Draganova, C., Christodoulou, C.: Comparing different classifiers for automatic age estimation. TSMC 34(1), 621–628 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geng, X., Wang, Q., Xia, Y.: Facial age estimation by adaptive label distribution learning. In: ICPR (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo, G., Fu, Y., Huang, T.S., Dyer, C.R.: Image-based human age estimation by manifold learning and locally adjusted robust regression. TIP 17(7), 1178–1188 (2008)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guo, G., Mu, G., Fu, Y., Huang, T.S.: Human age estimation using bio-inspired features. In: CVPR (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chang, K.Y., Chen, C.S., Hung, Y.P.: Ordinal hyperplanes ranker with cost sensitivities for age estimation. In: CVPR (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, S., Tao, D., Yang, J.: Relative attribute SVM+ learning for age estimation. TC 46(3), 827–839 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang, M.L., Yu, F.: Solving the partial label learning problem: an instance-based approach. In: IJCAI (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cour, T., Sapp, B., Taskar, B.: Learning from partial labels. JMLR 12, 1501–1536 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cour, T., Sapp, B., Jordan, C., Taskar, B.: Learning from ambiguously labeled images. In: CVPR (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Escalera, S., Fabian, J., Pardo, P., Baro, X., Gonzalez, J., Escalante, H., Guyon, I.: ChaLearn 2015 apparent age and cultural event recognition: datasets and results. In: ICCV, ChaLearn Looking at People Workshop (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: NIPS (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    MacKay, D.J.: Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berger, A.L., Pietra, V.J.D., Pietra, S.A.D.: A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comput. Linguist. 22(1), 39–71 (1996)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pietra, S.D., Pietra, V.D., Lafferty, J.: Inducing features of random fields. TPAMI 19(4), 380–393 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nocedal, J., Wright, S.: Numerical Optimization. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Malouf, R.: A comparison of algorithms for maximum entropy parameter estimation. In: The 6th Conference on Natural Language Learning (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., Taylor, C.J.: Active appearance models. TPAMI 23(6), 681–685 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yan, S., Wang, H., Huang, T.S., Yang, Q., Tang, X.: Ranking with uncertain labels. In: ICME (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yan, S., Wang, H., Tang, X., Huang, T.S.: Learning auto-structured regressor from uncertain nonnegative labels. In: ICCV (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smola, A.J., Schölkopf, B.: A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 14(3), 199–222 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Signal ProcessingTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations