Skip to main content

Timing the Decision Support for Real-World Many-Objective Optimization Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10173))

Abstract

Lately, there is growing emphasis on improving the scalability of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) so that many-objective problems (characterized by more than three objectives) can be effectively dealt with. Alternatively, the utility of integrating decision maker’s (DM’s) preferences into the optimization process so as to target some most preferred solutions by the DM (instead of the whole Pareto-optimal front), is also being increasingly recognized. The authors here, have earlier argued that despite the promises in the latter approach, its practical utility may be impaired by the lack of—objectivity, repeatability, consistency, and coherence in the DM’s preferences. To counter this, the authors have also earlier proposed a machine learning based decision support framework to reveal the preference-structure of objectives. Notably, the revealed preference-structure may be sensitive to the timing of application of this framework along an MOEA run. In this paper the authors counter this limitation, by integrating a termination criterion with an MOEA run, towards determining the appropriate timing for application of the machine learning based framework. Results based on three real-world many-objective problems considered in this paper, highlight the utility of the proposed integration towards an objective, repeatable, consistent, and coherent decision support for many-objective problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Coello, C.A.C., Lamont, G.B., Veldhuizen, D.A.V.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems. Springer, New York (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Purshouse, R., Fleming, P.: Evolutionary many-objective optimisation: an exploratory analysis. Congr. Evol. Comput. 3, 2066–2073 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: a short review. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2419–2426, June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duro, J.A., Saxena, D.K., Deb, K., Zhang, Q.: Machine learning based decision support for many-objective optimization problems. Neurocomputing 146, 30–47 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11, 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bader, J., Zitzler, E.: HypE: an algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization. Evol. Comput. 19(1), 45–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Purshouse, R.C., Deb, K., Mansor, M.M., Mostaghim, S., Wang, R.: A review of hybrid evolutionary multiple criteria decision making methods. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1147–1154, July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saxena, D.K., Sinha, A., Duro, J.A., Zhang, Q.: Entropy based termination criterion for multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20(4), 485–498 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghiassi, M., Kijowski, B.A., Devor, R.E., Dessouky, M.I.: An application of multiple criteria decision making principles for planning machining operations. IIE Trans. 16(2), 106–114 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Musselman, K., Talavage, J.: A tradeoff cut approach to multiple objective optimization. Oper. Res. 28(6), 1424–1435 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Azene, Y.T.: Work roll system optimisation using thermal analysis and genetic algorithm. Ph.D. thesis, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, May 2011

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João A. Duro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Duro, J.A., Saxena, D.K. (2017). Timing the Decision Support for Real-World Many-Objective Optimization Problems. In: Trautmann, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54157-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics