Advertisement

Beyond Bureaucracy

  • Alois PaulinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 25)

Abstract

This chapter describes Beyond Bureaucracy as an emerging research field concerned with radical innovation for governance of juropolitical systems. The grand objective of Beyond Bureaucracy is to act as an incubator for the development of new forms of organisation and new technological artefacts, which would enable transformation of public governance. In this role, Beyond Bureaucracy does not prescribe a concrete outcome, but rather calls for creative ideas, radical visions, and rigorous discussions on how twenty-century technology can serve as a basis for further transformation and radical development. This chapter explains how Beyond Bureaucracy differs from related fields like e-Government or e-Democracy, provides an overview over the state of research in Beyond Bureaucracy, provides links to follow-up literature, and aims to provide a seed vision on the transformation potentials that could be researched-towards in scope of Beyond Bureaucracy.

Keywords

Radical Innovation Incremental Innovation Unprecedented Scale Democratic Control Common Wealth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albrow, M., 1970. Bureaucracy. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B.R.O., 2006. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, Rev. ed. ed. Verso, London ; New York.Google Scholar
  3. Anthopoulos, L.G., Siozos, P., Tsoukalas, I.A., 2007. Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services. Government Information Quarterly 24, 353–376. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.07.018.
  4. Bannister, F., Connolly, R., 2015. The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem? Government Information Quarterly 32, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.003.
  5. Bekkers, V., Homburg, V., 2007. The Myths of e-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government. The Information Society 23, 373–382. doi: 10.1080/01972240701572913.
  6. Binks, M., 2014. The Crucial Role of Universities in Promoting Radical Innovation, in: Greenaway, D., Rudd, C.D. (Eds.), The Business Growth Benefits of Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
  7. Blühdorn, I., 2014. Post-Ecologist Governmentability: Post-Democracy, Post-Politics and the Politics of Unsustainability, in: Wilson, J., Swyngedouw, E. (Eds.), The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  8. Blühdorn, I., 2007. Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation. Environmental Politics 16, 251–275. doi: 10.1080/09644010701211759.
  9. Blum, C., Zuber, C.I., 2016. Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives: Liquid Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy 24, 162–182. doi: 10.1111/jopp.12065.
  10. Boukhris, I., Ayachi, R., Elouedi, Z., Mellouli, S., Amor, N.B., 2015. Decision Model for Policy Makers in the Context of Citizens Engagement: Application on Participatory Budgeting. Social Science Computer Review. doi: 10.1177/0894439315618882.
  11. Bovens, M., Zouridis, S., 2002. From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control. Public Administration Review 62, 174–184. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00168.
  12. ccsce.com, 2015. California Remains the World’s 8th Largest Economy.Google Scholar
  13. Coursey, D., Norris, D.F., 2008. Models of e‐Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment. Public Administration Review 68, 523–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x.
  14. Dikötter, F., 2010. Mao’s great famine: the history of China’s most devastating catastrophe, 1958–1962, 1st U.S. ed. ed. Walker & Co, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Downs, A., 1967. Inside bureaucracy, A Rand Corporation research study. Little, Brown, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
  16. Gerhardt, C.J. (Ed.), 1890. Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz [The philosophic works of Gottfried W. Leibniz]. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  17. Graeber, D., 2015. The utopia of rules: on technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Melville House, Brooklyn/ London.Google Scholar
  18. Hainisch, R., Paulin, A., 2016. Civicracy: Establishing a Competent and Responsible Council of Representatives based on Liquid Democracy, in: Proceedings of the International Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government 2016. Presented at the CeDEM’16: Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government, IEEE, Krems, Austria.Google Scholar
  19. Jabbusch, S., 2011. Liquid Democracy in der Piratenpartei - Eine neue Chance für innerparteiliche Demokratie im 21. Jahrhundert? [Liquid Democracy in the Pirate Party - A new Chance for Interparty-Democracy in the 21th Century?]. Universität Greifswald, Philosophische Fakultät, Greifswald.Google Scholar
  20. Jensenius, A.R., 2012. Disciplinarities: intra, cross, multi, inter, trans. arj.no.Google Scholar
  21. Nijeboer, A., 2013. Liquid Democracy versus Direct Democracy through Initiative and Referendum: Which is Best?.Google Scholar
  22. O’Reilly, T., 2010. Government as a Platform, in: Lathrop, D., Ruma, L. (Eds.), Open Government - Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. pp. 11–39.Google Scholar
  23. O’Toole, G., 2011. My Customers Would Have Asked for a Faster Horse - Henry Ford? Edward Menge? Lewis Mumford? Sedgewick Seti? Apocryphal? [WWW Document]. Quote Investigator. URL http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/07/28/ford-faster-horse/ (accessed 8.1.16).
  24. Paulin, A., 2017. Informating Public Governance: towards a Basis for a Digital Ecosystem. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age 4. doi: 10.4018/IJPADA.2017040102.
  25. Paulin, A., 2016. Technological Ecosystems’ Role in Preventing Neo- Feudalism in Smart-City Informatization, in: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. Presented at the WWW Conference, Montreal, Canada. doi: 10.1145/2872518.288861.
  26. Paulin, A., 2015a. Research Agenda towards a Structured and Sustainable Non-Bureaucratic Government, in: Balthasar, A., Golob, B., Hansen, H., König, B., Müller-Török, R., Prosser, A. (Eds.), Independence Day: Time for a European Internet? Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European e-Dem and e-Gov Days 2015, Books@ocg.at. Austrian Computer Soc., Wien.Google Scholar
  27. Paulin, A., 2015b. Twenty Years After the Hype: Is e-Government doomed? Findings from Slovenia. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age 2, 1–21. doi: 10.4018/ijpada.2015040101.
  28. Paulin, A., 2014. Through Liquid Democracy to Sustainable Non-Bureaucratic Government - Harnessing the Power of ICTs for a novel form of Digital Government. JeDEM 6.Google Scholar
  29. Paulin, A., 2013. Towards Self-Service Government - A Study on the Computability of Legal Eligibilities. Journal of Universal Computer Science 19, 1761–1791. doi: 10.3217/jucs-019-12-1761.
  30. Paulin, A., 2012. Secure SQL Server - Enabling Secure Access to Remote Relational Data. arXiv:1201.1081.
  31. Paulin, A., Anthopoulos, L. (Eds.), 2017. IJPADA Special Issue: “Reaching Beyond Bureaus: Perspectives and Challenges of Sustainable, Non-Bureaucratic Government,” International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age. IGI Global.Google Scholar
  32. Peters, B., 2016. How not to network a nation: the uneasy history of the Soviet internet, The information policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  33. Raymond, E.S., 1999. The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  34. Reddick, C.G., Turner, M., 2012. Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: Comparing e-government to traditional service delivery. Government Information Quarterly 29, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.03.005.
  35. Schmidt, A., 2014. Secrecy versus openness: Internet security and the limits of open source and peer production (PhD thesis). TU Delft, Delft, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  36. Scholl, H.J., n.d. About Me| Hans Jochen Scholl [WWW Document]. URL http://faculty.washington.edu/jscholl/about-me/ (accessed 8.1.16).
  37. Stember, M., 1991. Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise. The Social Science Journal 28, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B.
  38. Zuboff, S., 1988. In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations