Advertisement

From Weber to the Web… Can ICT Reduce Bureaucratic Corruption?

  • Grzegorz MakowskiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 25)

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to analyse question if, and if yes, then what potential have information technologies to solve the traditional problems of bureaucracy—tendency to inertness, to depart from the mission to serve public good and to transform into one more interests group or structure susceptible to cronyism, conflicts of interest, corruption and other irregularities. The text is also a reflection on how new forms of control over public administration, driven by ICT may change it and push it towards participatory governance based on the principles of dialogue and civic engagement.

Keywords

Civil Service Public Officer Public Administration Open Government Official Post 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Atreya B., Armstrong A. (2002) A Review of the Criticisms and the Future of New Public Management, Victoria University of Technology School of Management Working Papers, 7Google Scholar
  2. Bekkers V., Korteland E. (2005): Governance, ICT and the Modernization Agenda of Public Administration: A Comparison of Some European Policy Initiatives, Information and Communication Technology and Public Innovation, 1: 22–50Google Scholar
  3. Benchmarking Public Procurement 2016 Assessing Public Procurement Systems in 77 Economies, Washington: The World Bank (2016)Google Scholar
  4. Berliner D. (2014) The Political Origins of Transparency, The Journal of Politics, 70(2): 479–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canning P. (Ed.) (2014). Hope for Democracy. 25 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide, Nelson Dias: Sao Brás De AlportelGoogle Scholar
  6. Cernat L., Kutlina-Dimitrova Z. (2015) International Public Procurement: From Scant Facts to Hard Data, Chiefs Economist Note, 1Google Scholar
  7. Chandan, J. K., Sarangi, S. (2014). Social Media, Internet and Corruption, Department of Economics Louisiana State University, http://bus.lsu.edu/McMillin/Working_Papers/pap14_03.pdf Accessed 19 September 2016
  8. Coursey, D. & Norris D. F. (2008) Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment, Public Administration Review, 68(3): 523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. E-Government of Korea. Best Practices, Seoul: Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, (2013)Google Scholar
  10. Ferejohn, J. & Pasquino, P. (2003). Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law in J. S. Maravall, A. Przeworski (Ed.) Democracy and the Rule of Law, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,Google Scholar
  11. Garcia-Murillo M. (2013) Does a government web presence reduce perceptions of corruption?, Information Technology for Development, 19(2): 151–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Government at Glance 2015, Paris: OECD (2015)Google Scholar
  13. Gratto A., Preston B., Snilsberg T. (2002). Mitigating Corruption in New Public Management, Privatization and Devolution, http://s3.amazonaws.com/mildredwarner.org/attachments/000/000/318/original/b0c039c239111fc1728c18b7b3e685f1 Accessed 11 December 2016
  14. Grindle M. (2004), Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries, Governance, 12: 525–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gruening G. (2001) Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management, International Public Management Journal, 4: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grunberger R. (1987), Historia społeczna Trzeciej Rzeszy. Tom I, Warsaw: PIWGoogle Scholar
  17. Harlan, Y. & Robinson, D. G. (2012). The New Ambiguity of “Open Government”, UCLA Law Review Discourse 59: 178–208Google Scholar
  18. Hintze O. (1970). Staat und Verfassung: gesammelte Abhandlungen zur allgemeinen Verfassungsgeschichte, Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtGoogle Scholar
  19. Hood C. (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69: 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horton S. (2006) The Public Service Ethos in the British Civil Service: An Historical Institutional Analysis, Public Policy and Administration, 21(1): 32–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/themes/clld_en, Accessed 22 August 2016
  22. Huntington S. (2007). Modernization and Corruption in A. Hidenheimer & M. Johnston (Ed.) Political Corruption. Concepts & Contexts, New Brunswick: Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
  23. Izdebski, K. (2015). Transparency and Open Data Principles: Why They Are Important and How They Increase Public Participation and Tackle Corruption, http://transparencee.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/open-data-principles-by-krzysztof-izdebski.pdf Accessed 10 December 2016
  24. Jamrozik, A. & Nocella, L. (1998). The Sociology of Social Problems. Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamen, H. (2000). Early Modern European Society, London and New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Klages H., Löffler E. (1998) New public management in Germany: the implementation process of the New Steering Model, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64: 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindstedt C. & Naurin D. (2010). Transparency is not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3): 301–322.Google Scholar
  28. Mączak, A. (1985). Rządzący i rządzeni, Warsaw: PIWGoogle Scholar
  29. Makowski, G. (2006). Korupcja jako problem społeczny, Warsaw: TRIOGoogle Scholar
  30. Makowski, G. (2014). Czekając na otwarte rządy. Wnioski i rekomendacje, Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana BatoregoGoogle Scholar
  31. Makowski, G., Mileszy, N., Sobiech, R., Stokowska, A., Wiaderek, G. (2014). The conflict of interest in the Polish government administration. Legal regulations, practice, attitudes of public officers, Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana BatoregoGoogle Scholar
  32. Mann M. (2000) Were the Perpetrators of Genocide“Ordinary Men” or “Real Nazis”? Results from Fifteen Hundred Biographies, Holocaust Genocide Studies, 14(3): 331–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCourt, W. (2005). New Public Management in Developing Countries in K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osborne Stephen P., E. Ferlie (Ed.) New Public Management: Current Trends and Future, Routledge: LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Merton, K. R (2002). Teoria socjologiczna i struktura społeczna, Warsaw: PWNGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, W. L., Grodeland, W. B., Koshechkina, T. Y. (2001). A Culture of Corruption? Coping with Government in Post-communist Europe, CEU: BudapestGoogle Scholar
  36. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (Ed.) (2011). Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lesson Learned, NORAD: OsloGoogle Scholar
  37. Mungiu-Pippidi A. (2013) The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Controlling Corruption in the European Union, European Research Centre for Anti-corruption and State-building, Working Paper 35Google Scholar
  38. Ostrom V., Ostrom E. (1971) Public choice: a different approach to the study of public administration, Public Administration Review, 31: 203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plascencia D. R. (2015) Fighting corruption in Mexico: social media and its impact in public accountability, Iberoamérica Social, III(5)Google Scholar
  40. Prakash, G., Singh, A. (2008). A New Public Management Perspective in Indian E-Governance Initiatives, http://www.iceg.net/2008/books/1/8_71-80.pdf Accessed 22 September 2016
  41. Ritzer, G. (1997). Makdonaldyzacja społeczeństwa, Warsaw: MUZAGoogle Scholar
  42. Rose-Ackerman, S. & Truex, R. (2013). Corruption and Policy Reform, [in:] B. B. Lomborg (Ed.), Global Problems, Smart Solutions: Costs and Benefits, Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Soreide T., Rose-Ackerman S. (2015) Corruption in state administration, Yale Law & Economics Research Paper, 529: 1–25;Google Scholar
  44. Stubbs, R. (2011). A Case Study in The Rise of Public Sector Transparency: Understanding the Global Diffusion of Freedom of Information Law, International Relations/Political Science, Hobart: University of TasmaniaGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner, H. J., Beeghley, J., Powers, H. C. (2012). The Emergence of Sociological Theory. Seventh Edition, Sage: LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Vila S. (2013). New Technologies Against Petty Corruption, https://issuu.com/theengineroom/docs/new_technologies_against_petty_corruption Accessed 22 September 2016
  47. von Klaveren, J. (2007). Corruption as a Historical Phenomenon in A. Hidenheimer, M. Johnston Michael (Ed.) Political Corruption. Concepts & Contexts, Transaction Publishers: New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  48. Weber, M. (2002). Gospodarka i społeczeństwo, Warsaw: PWNGoogle Scholar
  49. Wensink, W. & de Vet Maarten, J., at All (2013). Identifying and Reducing Corruption in Public Procurement in the UE, PwC/Ecorys: BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Collegium Civitas / Stefan Batory FoundationWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations