Abstract
Field studies were conducted to examine the response of potato, carrot, fava bean, and pepper to irrigation regimes using saline water in a commercial farm. The irrigation regimes were full (FI100) and deficit (DI70) irrigated with levels of 100 and 70% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) when the readily available water, 40% of total available water (TAW), in the FI100 treatment was depleted, and traditional farmer practice (FM). For all experiments, the largest soil salinity values were observed under the farmer treatment compared to the FI100 and DI70 treatments. The highest mean yields of potato (24.4–27.5 t/ha), carrot (28.4–30.3 t/ha), fava bean (19–21.3 t/ha), and pepper (10.9–12.5 t/ha) were recorded for the FI100 treatment. Compared with FI100, significant reductions in potato, carrot, fava bean, and pepper yields were observed under the DI70 treatment, with only a few exceptions, resulting from a reduction in yield components. The farmer’s method not only caused significant reductions in yields but also resulted in an increase of water usage of 14–22%, 18–21%, 12.5–19%, and 13.9–15.5% for potato, carrot, fava bean, and pepper, respectively, and increased soil salinity. Water productivity (WP) values reflected the differences in yields and varied between 4.3 (farmer) and 13.7 kg/m3 (DI70) for potato, 4.4 and 11.7 kg/m3 for carrot, 4.8 and 13.7 kg/m3 for fava beans, and 0.8 and 2.6 kg/m3 for pepper across different years and treatments. The FI100 scheduling technique with variable water amounts was more efficient and provided significant advantage in yield, water productivity and net income, compared to the FM treatment in potato, carrot, fava beans, and pepper yields under arid environment. FI100 scheduling technique is suggested for vegetable crops in the arid environment. Under water restriction conditions, adoption of the DI70 strategy allows 30% water saving compared with FI100 with relatively small impact on soil salinity and some reductions in yield and net income.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen RG, Perreira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper N° 56 FAO Rome Italy
Ali MH, Hoque MR, Hassan AA, Khair MA (2007) Effects of deficit irrigation on yield, water productivity, and economic returns of wheat. Agric Water Manage 92:151–161
Ayars JE, Hutmacher RB, Steiner JJ, Mantel AB, Vail SS (1991) Irrigation of carrots on a sandy loam soil. Irrig Sci 12:193–198
Batra BR (1990) Effect of different levels of irrigation and fertilization on growth and yield of carrot (Daucus carota L.) for root production. Veg Sci 17(2):127–139
Bustan A, Sagi M, De Malach Y, Pasternak D (2004) Effects of saline irrigation water and heat waves on potato production in an arid environment. Field Crops Res 90:275–285
Jalota SK, Sood A, Chahal GBS, Choudhury BU (2006) Crop water productivity of cotton-wheat system as influenced by deficit irrigation, soil texture and precipitation. Agric Water Manage 84:137–146
Maas EV (1990) Crop salt tolerance. In: Tanji KK (Ed) Agricultural salinity assessment and management, ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice no. 71. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 262–304
Malash N, Flowers TJ, Ragab R (2005) Effect of irrigation systems and water management practices using saline and non-saline water on tomato production. Agric Water Manage 78:25–38
Minhas PS (1996) Saline water management for irrigation in India. Agric Water Manage 30:1–24
Nagaz K (2007) Gestion de l’irrigation à l’eau salée en milieu steppique. Thèse de doctorat en sciences agronomiques INAT Tunisia p 164
Nagaz K, Masmoudi MM, Ben Mechlia N (2007) Irrigation scheduling calendars development and validation under actual farmers’ conditions in arid regions of Tunisia. Options Méditerranéennes Séries B No. 56(1):249–259
Nagaz K, Masmoudi MM, Ben Mechlia N (2013) Field studies on the use of saline water for deficit irrigation in arid Tunisia. In: Hossain Ali M (ed) Irrigation management, technologies and environmental impact. Nova Science Publishers Inc., Hauppauge, NY, USA, pp 87–128
Pasternak D, De Malach Y (1995) Crop irrigation with saline water. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop stress. Marcel Dekker Inc., NY, pp 599–622
Ritchie JT (1972) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour Res 8:1204–1213
Sermet O, Caliskan ME, Onder D, Caliskan S (2005) Different irrigation methods and water stress effects on potato yield components. Agric Water Manage 73(1):73–86
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge that this work was funded by USAID and managed by ICARDA through the Water and Livelihood Initiative (WLI) and by the European Union, through the WADIS-MAR project (ENPI/2011/280-008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagaz, K., El Mokh, F., Masmoudi, M.M., Ben Mechlia, N., Belkheiri, O., Ghiglieri, G. (2017). Response of Vegetable Crops to Irrigation Regimes Using Saline Waters. In: Ouessar, M., Gabriels, D., Tsunekawa, A., Evett, S. (eds) Water and Land Security in Drylands. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54021-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54021-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54020-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54021-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)