How Effective Have Reform Policies Been in Redesigning the French Higher Education and Research System?

Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education book series (PSGHE)

Abstract

Focusing on the French higher education and research (HER) system, this chapter explores the aims of the reforms introduced over the last 35 years and how much they have contributed to the forming of national elites. It accounts for the new organizational and governance tools introduced during the two reform phases (incremental phase and radical phase). These reforms attempt to overcome two divides: between the prestigious grandes écoles (elite colleges) and more accessible universities, and between teaching and research. This chapter explores the extent to which the aims of simplification, diversification, concentration, stratification, and territorialization of the HER system have been achieved through formal rule changes and incentives for ‘excellence’ with a view to aligning French HER with international norms.

Keywords

French higher education and research system Incremental and radical reforms Implementation Stratification Behavior of stakeholders 

References

  1. Attali, B. (2015). L’X dans une nouvelle dimension. Paris: la Documentation Française.Google Scholar
  2. Bezes, P. (2009). Réinventer l’Etat. Les réformes de l’administration française (1962–2008). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  3. Crozier, M. (1982). Strategies for Change. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. EUA-European University Assoication. (2017). University Autonomy in Europe. Brussels: European University Association.Google Scholar
  5. Krücken, G., and Meier, F. (2006). Turning Universities into an Organizational Actor. In: G. S. Drori, J. Meyer, and H. Hwan, eds., Globalization and Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–247.Google Scholar
  6. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organisations: A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Musselin, C. (2005). The Long March of French Universities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Paradeise, C. (2011). Higher Education Careers in the French Public Sector, Permanence and Change. In: Avedduto S., ed., Convergence or Differentiation. Human Resources for Research in a Changing European Scenario, Napoli: ScriptWeb, pp. 159–184.Google Scholar
  9. Paradeise, C. (2012). The Academic Profession in the Clutches of New Public Management: The French case. In: P. Bezes et al., New Public Management and Professionals in the Public Sector. What New Patterns Beyond Opposition?, Sociologie du Travail, Vol. 54, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
  10. Paradeise, C., and Filliatreau, G. (2016). The Emergent Action Field of Metrics: From Rankings to Altmetrics. In: E. Popp Berman and C. Paradeise, eds., The University under Pressure, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 87–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Paradeise, C., and Musselin, C. (2009). France: From Invisible Transitions to Institutional Change. In: C. Paradeise, E. Ferlie, I. Bleiklie, and E. Reale, eds., University Governance: Western European comparative perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paradeise, C., and Thoenig, J.-C. (2015). In Search of Academic Quality. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paradeise, C., Ferlie, E, Bleiklie, I, and Reale, E. eds. (2009). University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Thoenig, J.-C., and Paradeise, C. (2016). Strategic Capacities and Organizational Capabilities: A Challenge for Universities. Minerva, 54(3), pp. 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Veltz, P. (2007). Faut-il sauver les grandes écoles?. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Paris-EstChamps-sur-MarneFrance

Personalised recommendations