Advertisement

Experiencing Natural Disasters: How This Influences Risk Aversion and Trust

  • Oliver Fiala
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the effect of natural disasters on individual behaviour, with a particular focus on individuals’ risk-taking behaviour and levels of trust. A theoretical analysis and empirical results from the literature are followed by an introduction to the conducted field experiment. Thereafter, empirical evidence from rural Cambodia will be presented in order to investigate the impact of natural disaster exposure and other socio-economic factors on individuals’ risk-taking propensity and levels of trust and trustworthiness.

Keywords

Risk Behaviour Risk Aversion Natural Disaster Discrete Choice Experiment Trust Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahsan D (2014) Does natural disaster influence people’s risk preference and trust? An experiment from cyclone prone coast of Bangladesh. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 9:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2002) Who trusts others? J Public Econ 85:207–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asgary A, Levy J (2009) A review of the implications of prospect theory for natural hazards and disaster planning. Int J Environ Res 3:379–394Google Scholar
  4. Ayton P, Fischer I (2004) The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness? Mem Cognit 32:1369–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakshi GS, Chen Z (1994) Baby boom, population aging, and capital markets. J Bus 67:165–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barr A (2003) Trust and expected trustworthiness: experimental evidence from Zimbabwean villages. Econ J 113:614–630Google Scholar
  7. Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ Behav 10:122–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørnskov C, Méon P-G (2010) The productivity of trust. CEB Working Paper 10/042, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjørnskov C, Méon P-G (2013) Is trust the missing root of institutions, education, and development? Public Choice 157:641–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance. Ecol Econ 68:2265–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burks SV, Carpenter JP, Verhoogen E (2003) Playing both roles in the trust game. J Econ Behav Organ 51:195–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler JK, Cantrell SR (1984) A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychol Rep 55:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cameron L, Shah M (2015) Risk-taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. Hum Resour 50:484–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardenas JC, Carpenter J (2008) Behavioural development economics: lessons from field labs in the developing world. J Dev Stud 44:311–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cassar A, Healy A, von Kessler C (2012) Trust, risk, and time preferences after a natural disaster: experimental evidence from Thailand. University of San Francisco, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  16. Castillo M, Carter M (2011) Behavioral responses to natural disasters. GMU Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavallo E, Noy I (2010) The economics of natural disasters—a survey. IDB Working Paper Series 124, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke DJ, Grenham D (2013) Microinsurance and natural disasters: challenges and options. Environ Sci Policy 27:S89–S98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole S, Giné X, Tobacman J et al (2013) Barriers to household risk management: evidence from India. Am Econ J Appl Econ 5:104–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Croson R, Sundali J (2005) The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: empirical data from casinos. J Risk Uncertain 30:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dang DA (2012) On the sources of risk preferences in rural Vietnam. MPRA Paper 38058, MunichGoogle Scholar
  22. Das TK, Teng B-S (2004) The risk-based view of trust: a conceptual framework. J Bus Psychol 19:85–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Bock O, Gelade W (2012) The demand for microinsurance: a literature review. Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper 26, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. Dhami S, Al-Nowaihi A (2007) Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory. J Econ Behav Organ 64:171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dillenberger D, Rozen K (2015) History-dependent risk attitude. J Econ Theory 157:445–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Forecasting risk attitudes: an experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. J Econ Behav Organ 68:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eckel CC, El-Gamal MA, Wilson RK (2009) Risk loving after the storm: a Bayesian-network study of Hurricane Katrina evacuees. J Econ Behav Organ 69:110–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eiser RJ, Bostrom A, Burton I et al (2012) Risk interpretation and action: a conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 1:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischhoff B, Goitein B, Shapira Z (1983) Subjective expected utility: a model of decision-making. Adv Psychol 16:183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fleming DA, Chong A, Bejarano HD (2014) Trust and reciprocity in the aftermath of natural disasters. J Dev Stud 50:1482–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust—the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Gambetta D (1988) Can we trust trust? In: Gambetta D (ed) Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 213–237Google Scholar
  33. Gheyssens J, Günther I (2011) Risk experiments in gains and losses: do rural villagers want micro-insurance? ETH Discussion paper, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  34. Gilovich T, Vallone R, Tversky A (1985) The hot hand in basketball: on the misperception of random sequences. Cogn Psychol 17:295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gollier C, Pratt JW (1996) Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica 64:1109–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guiso L, Paiella M (2008) Risk aversion, wealth, and background risk. J Eur Econ Assoc 6:1109–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Halek M, Eisenhauer JG (2001) Demography of risk aversion. J Risk Insur 68:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hallegatte S (2012) An exploration of the link between development, economic growth, and natural risk. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6216, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Bonzanigo L et al (2016) Shock waves: managing the impacts of climate change on poverty. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  40. Hanaoka C, Shigeoka H, Watanabe Y (2015) Do risk preferences change? Evidence from panel data before and after the great East Japan earthquake. NBER Working Paper Series 21400, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  41. Huber J, Kirchler M, Stöckl T (2010) The hot hand belief and the gambler’s fallacy in investment decisions under risk. Theory Decis 68:445–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ingwersen N (2014) Impact of a natural disaster on observed risk aversion. Duke University, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  43. James HS (2002) The trust paradox: a survey of economic inquiries into the nature of trust and trustworthiness. J Econ Behav Organ 47:291–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanagaretnam K, Mestelman S, Nainar SMK, Shehata M (2010) Trust and reciprocity with transparency and repeated interactions. J Bus Res 63:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Karim A, Noy I (2016) Poverty and natural disasters – a qualitative survey of the empirical literature. Singapore Econ Rev 61:1640001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Karlan DS (2005) Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. Am Econ Rev 95:1688–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kee HW, Knox RE (1970) Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. J Confl Resolut 14:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kellenberg DK, Mobarak AM (2008) Does rising income increase or decrease damage risk from natural disasters? J Urban Econ 63:788–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Knack S, Keefer P (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Q J Econ 112:1251–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lerner JS, Keltner D (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. J Pers Soc Psychol 81:146–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Levhari D, Weiss Y (1974) The effect of risk on the investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev 64:950–963Google Scholar
  53. Levy JS (1992) An introduction to prospect theory. Polit Psychol 13:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lewicki RJ, McAllister DJ, Bies RJ (1998) Trust and distrust: new relationship and realities. Acad Manage Rev 23:438–458Google Scholar
  55. Li J-Z, Li S, Wang W-Z et al (2011) Are people always more risk averse after disasters? Surveys after a heavy snow-hit and a major earthquake in China in 2008. Appl Cogn Psychol 25:104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127:267–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. MacCrimmon KR, Wehrung D, Stanbury WT (1988) Taking risks. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Malmendier U, Nagel S (2011) Depression babies: do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking? Q J Econ 126:373–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Manag Sci 33:1404–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McKnight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad Manage Rev 23:473–490Google Scholar
  61. Narayan D, Pritchett L (1999) Cents and sociability: household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Econ Dev Cult Chang 47:871–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nguyen M-H, Reynaud A, Thomas A, Thanh ND (2012) Do natural disasters modify individual preferences: evidences from a field experiment in Vietnam. School of Economics, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  63. Open Development (2016) Open Development mapping kit. http://www.opendevelopmentcambodia.net/maps/. Accessed 29 Apr 2016
  64. Page L, Savage DA, Torgler B (2014) Variation in risk seeking behaviour following large losses: a natural experiment. Eurasian Econ Rev 71:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pat-Horenczyk R, Peled O, Miron T et al (2007) Risk-taking behaviors among Israeli adolescents exposed to recurrent terrorism: provoking danger under continuous threat? Am J Psychiatry 164:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32:122–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Quiggin J (2003) Background risk in generalized expected utility theory. Econ Theory 22:607–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raghunathan R, Pham MT (1999) All negative moods are not equal: motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 79:56–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reynaud A, Nguyen M-H (2012) Monetary valuation of flood insurance in Vietnam. Vietnam Center of Research in Economics, Management and Environment 01-2012, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh CityGoogle Scholar
  70. Reynaud A, Aubert C, Nguyen M-H (2013) Living with floods: protective behaviours and risk perception of Vietnamese households. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 38:547–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Riley WB, Chow KV (1992) Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financ Anal J 48:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manage Rev 23:393–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Said F, Afzal U, Turner G (2014) Attitudes towards risk in the wake of a rare event: evidence from Pakistan. CREB Working Paper 02-14, LahoreGoogle Scholar
  74. Said F, Afzal U, Turner G (2015) Risk taking and risk learning after a rare event: evidence from a field experiment in Pakistan. J Econ Behav Organ 118:167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Savage LJ (1954) The foundations of statistics. Courier Corporation, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  76. Schechter L (2007) Traditional trust measurement and the risk confound: an experiment in rural Paraguay. J Econ Behav Organ 62:272–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schmidt U, Starmer C, Sugden R (2008) Third-generation prospect theory. J Risk Uncertain 36:203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schoemaker PJH (1982) The expected utility model: its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. J Econ Lit 20:529–563Google Scholar
  79. Shanteau J (1992) Decision making under risk: applications to insurance purchasing. Adv Consum Res 19:177–181Google Scholar
  80. Shaw KL (1996) An empirical analysis of risk aversion and income growth. J Labor Econ 14:626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sheppard BH, Sherman DM (1998) The grammars of trust: a model and general implications. Acad Manage Rev 23:422–437Google Scholar
  82. Sitkin SB, Pablo AL (1992) Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Acad Manage Rev 17:9–38Google Scholar
  83. Sitkin SB, Roth NL (1993) Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ Sci 4:367–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Solnit R (2009) A paradise built in hell: the extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. Penguin Publishing Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  85. Tamura H (2005) Behavioral models for complex decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 166:655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Terrell D (1994) A test of the gambler’s fallacy: evidence from pari-mutuel games. J Risk Uncertain 8:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Toya H, Skidmore M (2012) Do natural disasters enhance societal trust? CESifo Working Paper 3905, MunichGoogle Scholar
  88. Turner G, Said F, Afzal U (2014) Microinsurance demand after a rare flood event: evidence from a field experiment in Pakistan. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 39:201–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain:297–323Google Scholar
  91. van den Berg M, Fort R, Burger K (2009) Natural hazards and risk aversion: experimental evidence from Latin America. In: International Association of Agricultural Economists conference 2009, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang H, Hanna SD (1997) Does risk tolerance decrease with age? Financ Couns Plan 8:27–32Google Scholar
  93. Whitt S, Wilson RK (2007) Public goods in the field: Katrina Evacuees in Houston. South Econ J 74:377–287Google Scholar
  94. World Bank (2013) World development report 2014: risk and opportunity—managing risk for development. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zak PJ, Knack S (2001) Trust and growth. Econ J 111:295–321Google Scholar
  96. Zweifel P, Eisen R (2012) Insurance economics. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Fiala
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsTU DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations