Skip to main content
  • 1354 Accesses

Abstract

Conflicts of interest interfere with professional judgment and can compromise the integrity and ethical standards of the research process. Conflicts erode public trust in an era when private nonprofit and profit-based corporations have become the primary sponsors of clinical trials. They may be in the form of maintaining or furthering research support, monetary remuneration, or academic standing. Full disclosure and public transparency may help ameliorate some of the ethical tensions in relationships between researchers and sponsors; however, full disclosure relies on accurate self-reporting by authors and editors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thompson DF. Understanding financial conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(8):573–6. doi:10.1056/NEJM199308193290812.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Souba WW, Wilmore DW. Surgical research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2001. xxxii, 1460 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McCarthy M. Sponsors lose fight to stop thyroxine study publication. Lancet. 1997;349(9059):1149. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)23016-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Constantinou G, Melides S, Modell B. The Olivieri case. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(9):860–3; author reply -3. doi:10.1056/NEJM200302273480919. PubMed PMID: 12606746.

  5. Guidelines for dealing with faculty conflicts of commitment and conflicts of interest in research. July 1990. Association of American Medical Colleges Ad Hoc Committee on Misconduct and Conflict of Interest in Research. Acad Med. 1990;65(7):487–496. PubMed PMID: 2242216.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Momeni A, Becker A, Bannasch H, Antes G, Blumle A, Stark GB. Association between research sponsorship and study outcome in plastic surgery literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(6):661–4. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181951917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Voineskos SH, Coroneos CJ, Ziolkowski NI, Kaur MN, Banfield L, Meade MO, Chung KC, Thoma A, Bhandari M. A, systematic review of surgical randomized controlled trials: part 2. Funding source, conflict of interest, and sample size in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(2):453e–61e. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000475767.61031.d1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. Consolidated standards of reporting trials G. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):e1–37. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Drazen JM, de Leeuw PW, Laine C, Mulrow CD, DeAngelis CD, Frizelle FA, Godlee F, Haug C, Hebert PC, James A, Kotzin S, Marusic A, Reyes H, Rosenberg J, Sahni P, Van Der Weyden MB, Zhaori G. Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: the updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(4):268–9. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaudhry S, Schroter S, Smith R, Morris J. Does declaration of competing interests affect readers’ perceptions? A randomised trial. BMJ. 2002;325(7377):1391–1392. PubMed PMID: 12480854; PMCID: PMC138516.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schroter S, Morris J, Chaudhry S, Smith R, Barratt H. Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers’ perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial. BMJ. 2004;328(7442):742–743. doi:10.1136/bmj.38035.705185.F6. PubMed PMID: 14980983; PMCID: PMC381324.

  12. Bridoux V, Moutel G, Schwarz L, Michot F, Herve C, Tuech JJ. Disclosure of funding sources and conflicts of interest in phase III surgical trials: survey of ten general surgery journals. World J Surg. 2014;38(10):2487–93. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2580-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forbes TL. Author disclosure of conflict of interest in vascular surgery journals. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(3 Suppl):55S–8S. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Tseng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tseng, J., Angelos, P. (2017). Conflict of Interest. In: Itani, K., Reda, D. (eds) Clinical Trials Design in Operative and Non Operative Invasive Procedures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53877-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53877-8_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53876-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53877-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics