The Transformative Power of Evaluation on University Governance
This chapter investigates how external evaluation affects university governance. The two research questions are: What makes evaluation a powerful instrument affecting the governance of universities? Do different evaluation instruments have different strengths in affecting governance? We assume that evaluation has several areas of potential effect on universities related to transformation of: hierarchical relationships between actors; the academic profession; management and performance. The chapter surveys relevant literature, followed by an outline of the conceptual framework, a presentation of the data used and the tests developed, and data analysis. We attempt to identify homogenous clusters of higher education institutions (HEIs) in terms of the extent to which evaluation influences their governance, before our concluding discussion of the analytical results and the conclusions.
- Dahler-Larsen, P. (2012). The Evaluation Society. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hammarfelt, B., de Rijcke, S. (2015). Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University. Research Evaluation, 24, 63–77.Google Scholar
- Huisman, J., Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2007). The effects of quality assurance in universities empirical evidence from three case studies. In L. Purser, L. Wilson, & E. Froment (Eds.), Introducing Bologna objectives and tools (pp. 1–28). Stuttgart: Raabe.Google Scholar
- Kooiman, I. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Marini, G., Reale, E. (2015). How does collegiality survive managerially led universities? Evidences from and European survey. European Journal of Higher Education, doi: 10.1080/21568235.2015.1070676.
- Musselin, C. (2007). Are Universities specific organizations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions. New Brunswick (USA): Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education., 33(3), 265–284.Google Scholar
- Neave, G. (2012). The evaluative state, institutional autonomy and re-engineering higher education in Western Europe. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives on curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co.Google Scholar
- Stame, N. (2006). Governance. Democracy and Evaluation, Evaluation, 12(1), 7–16.Google Scholar
- Whitley, R. (2007). ‘Introduction’. In R. Whitley, & J. Glaser (Eds.), The changing governance of the sciences (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar