Advertisement

Speaking Out or Staying Quiet on Climate Change: Broadcast Meteorologists Influenced by the Need to Be Pithy, Popular and Politically Cautious

  • Helen MeldrumEmail author
  • David Szymanski
  • Eric A. Oches
  • P. Thompson Davis
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Broadcast meteorologists are in a position to convey knowledge about climate change to the public. These media professionals make deliberate choices about what information to omit or present to their audiences. Interviews with broadcast meteorologists revealed a wide range of attitudes about conveying climate science to their viewers. Three significant concerns emerged from conversations with participants: on-air time constraints are non-negotiable, pressure to be a “popular” personality is constant, and there is an enduring apprehension about taking a position associated with a perceived controversial topic or political viewpoint. Discomfort with these constraints affects the content choices of broadcast meteorologists who might otherwise take a stand representing the scientific consensus on climate change.

Keywords

Broadcast meteorologists Attitudes and statements on climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate that this research was supported by a US National Science Foundation Grant 12-22521 through the Advances in Informal STEM Education program. We also thank our Bentley University undergraduate student Kathryn Foley for assistance in multiple ways throughout our NSF-funded project.

References

  1. Andregg WL, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SH (2010) Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(27):12107–12109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloodhart B, Maibach E, Myers T, Zhao X (2015) Local climate experts: the influence of local TV weather information on climate change perceptions. PLoS ONE 10(11):e0141526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boykoff MT, McNatt MB, Goodman MK (2015) The cultural politics of climate change news coverage around the world. In: The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, p 221Google Scholar
  4. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for Research on Environmental Decisions and ecoAmerica (2014) Connecting on climate: a guide to effective climate change communication. The Earth Institute, Columbia University, Copyright © December 2014 by The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York and ecoAmericaGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook J, Jacobs P (2014) Scientists are from Mars, laypeople are from Venus: an evidence-based rationale for communicating the consensus on climate. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, vol 34(6)Google Scholar
  7. Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8:024024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corner A, Whitmarsh L, Xenias D (2012) Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Clim Change 114(3–4):463–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniels GL, Loggins G (2010) Data, Doppler, or depth of knowledge: how do television stations differentiate local weather? Atlantic J Commun 18(1):22–35Google Scholar
  10. Davenport C (2014) Using weathercasters to deliver a climate change message. New York Times, 6 May 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/07/us/politics/using-weathercasters-to-deliver-a-climate-change-message.html?_r=0. Accessed 28 Apr 2016
  11. Davie WR, Auter PJ, Dinu LF (2006) Identifying the goals of weather instruction: toward a model approach for broadcast meteorology. Journalism Mass Commun Educ 61(2):149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doherty R, Barnhurst KG (2009) Controlling nature: weathercasts on local television news. J Broadcast Electron Media 53(2):211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2012) Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. J Polit 74(03):796–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton LC (2011) Do you believe the climate is changing? Answers from new survey research. Carsey School of Public Policy, University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Harlen W (ed) (2010) Principles and big ideas of science education. Association for Science Education, Ashford Colour Press Ltd., UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Hobson K, Niemeyer S (2012) “What sceptics believe”: the effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism. Publ Underst Sci. doi: 10.1177/0963662511430459 Google Scholar
  17. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team]. In: Pachauri RK, Meyer, LA (eds) IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalhoefer K, Robbins D, Seifter A (2016) How broadcast networks covered climate change in 2015: an analysis of nightly news and sunday shows. Media Matters for America, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Leiserowitz A (2007) Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images and interpretive communities. In Moser S, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, U.K.Google Scholar
  20. Maibach E, Wilson K, Witte J (2010) A national survey of television meteorologists about climate change: preliminary finds. Center for Climate Change CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  21. Moser SC (2016) Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say? Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 7(3):345–369Google Scholar
  22. Moser SC, Dilling L (2011) Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. In: The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–174Google Scholar
  23. Myers TA, Nisbet MC, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA (2012) A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Clim Change 113(3–4):1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Akerlof K, Leiserowitz AA (2013) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Change 3(4):343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perryman N, Theiss S (2014) “Weather girls” on the big screen: stereotypes, sex appeal, and science. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95(3):347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perse EM (1990) Media involvement and local news effects. J Broadcast Electron Media 34(1):17–36. doi: 10.1080/08838159009386723
  27. Perse EM, Rubin RB (1989) Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Commun Res 16(1):59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peters-Burton E, Schweizer V, Cobb S, Maibach E (2014) Weathercaster views on informal climate education: similarities and differences according to climate change attitudes. J Geosci Educ 62(3):431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. PEW Research Center (2010) Obama more popular abroad than at home: global image of U.S. continues to benefit. PEW Research Center: PEW Global Attitudes Project. From: http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1630/obama-more-popular-abroad-global-american-imagebenefit-22-nation-global-survey
  30. Posegate A (2008) Station scientists: beyond the daily forecast. Weatherwise 61(6):20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosen J (1989) Don’t need a weatherman? Harper’s Magazine, 35, April, pp 35–36Google Scholar
  32. Sandman PM (1994) Mass media and environmental risk: seven principles. Risk Health Saf Environ 5, 251Google Scholar
  33. Scruggs L, Benegal S (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the great recession? Glob Environ Change 22(2):505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shome D, Marx S, Appelt K, Arora P, Balstad R, Broad K, Leiserowitz A (2009) The psychology of climate change communication: a guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public. CRED Columbia University, New York, p 48Google Scholar
  35. Smith J (2016) Weathercasters hone climate change reporting skills [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www2.ucar.edu. Accessed 28 Apr 2016
  36. Stanfield K (2014) Why should they comment? Understanding local television news viewers motivation for commenting on stations’ Facebook pages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri—Columbia, Columbia, MissouriGoogle Scholar
  37. Swim J, Clayton S, Doherty T, Gifford R, Howard G, Reser J, Weber E (2009) Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Szymanski DW, Meldrum H, Davis PT, Oches EA, Foley K, Doner LA (2014) Views of broadcast meteorologists on climate change communication with their audiences. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, vol 46, no 6Google Scholar
  39. Thompson VK (2013) Ethical ambivalence in local television weathercasting: a Rossian analysis. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, p 178Google Scholar
  40. Van der Linden S (2014) Towards a new model for communicating climate change. In Cohen S, Higham J, Peeters P, Gössling S (eds) Understanding and governing sustainable tourism mobility: psychological and behavioural approaches. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, Florence, Kentucky, pp 243–275Google Scholar
  41. Vannini P, Mccright AM (2007) Technologies of the sky: a socio-semiotic and critical analysis of televised weather discourse. Crit Discourse Stud 4(1):49–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wibeck V (2014) Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change—some lessons from recent literature. Environ Educ Res 20(3):387–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson KM (2000) Communicating climate change through the media. Environ Risks Media, 201–217Google Scholar
  44. Wilson K (2006) Seals of (dis) approval: television broadcast meteorologists debate the value of voluntary credentials. National Weather Dig 30:100–107Google Scholar
  45. Wilson K (2008) Television weathercasters as potentially prominent science communicators. Publ Underst Sci 17(1):73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson K (2009) Opportunities and obstacles for television broadcast meteorologists to report on climate change. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90(10):1457–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson KM (2012) Ideology trumps meteorology: why many television broadcast meteorologists remain unconvinced of human-caused global warming. Electronic News 6(4):208–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhao X, Maibach E, Gandy J, Witte J, Cullen H, Klinger BA, Pyle A (2014) Climate change education through TV weathercasts: results of a field experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95(1):117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Meldrum
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Szymanski
    • 1
  • Eric A. Oches
    • 1
  • P. Thompson Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural and Applied SciencesBentley UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations