This chapter analyzes the political and philosophical dimension of Augusto Roa Bastos’s most famous novel, I the Supreme. Kraniauskas concentrates on the transformation of sovereign power from the moment in which El Supremo—as sovereign—dictates history, to another in which history overtakes him to dictate-write the dictator’s sovereign passing. He reads this tension through the lens of Rousseau’s The Social Contract focusing on the relationship between the sovereign and the people, constitution and revolution. In Rousseau’s text this theoretical tension is resolved through the creation of a fictional figure, the Jacobin “Lawgiver.” The author argues that the novel occupies this dramatic fictional site at a moment when in Argentina, where Roa Bastos wrote the novel in the early 1970s, Revolution was again on the horizon. In that political context, Kraniauskas sustains that the novel narrates a redistribution of sovereignty that reflects upon, and suggests, a critique of representation.
- Stuck Fast
- Alberto Moreiras
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Editors and Affiliations
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kraniauskas, J. (2018). Writing the State: The Redistribution of Sovereignty and the Figure of the “Legislator” in I the Supreme by Augusto Roa Bastos. In: Pous, F., Quin, A., Viera, M. (eds) Authoritarianism, Cultural History, and Political Resistance in Latin America. Memory Politics and Transitional Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53544-9_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53543-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53544-9