Analyses of Wave Scattering and Absorption Produced by WEC Arrays: Physical/Numerical Experiments and Model Assessment

  • H. Tuba Özkan-Haller
  • Merrick C. Haller
  • J. Cameron McNatt
  • Aaron Porter
  • Pukha Lenee-Bluhm
Chapter

Abstract

Knowledge of the effects of wave energy converters (WECs) on the near and far wave fields is critical to the efficient and low-risk design of waveforms. Several computational wave models enable the evaluation of WEC array effects, but model validation has been limited. In this chapter, we validate two popular models with very different formulations: the phase-resolving model WAMIT and the phase-averaged Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) model. The models are validated against wave data from an extensive set of WEC array laboratory experiments conducted by Oregon State University and Columbia Power Technologies, Inc (CPT). The experimental WECs were 1:33 scale versions of a commercial device (CPT “Manta”), and several different WEC array configurations were subjected to a range of regular waves and random sea states. The wave field in the lee of the WEC arrays was mapped, and the wave shadow was quantified for all sea states. In addition, the WEC power capture performance was measured independently via a motion-tracking system and compared to the observed wave energy deficit (i.e., the wave shadow). Overall, WAMIT displays skill in predicting the wave field both in offshore and in the lee of the WEC arrays. WAMIT simulations demonstrate partial standing wave patterns that are consistent with the observations. These patterns are related to wave scattering processes, and their presence increases the magnitude of the wave shadow in the lee of WECs. The pattern is less pronounced at longer wave periods where WECs behave more like wave followers. In these situations, the wave shadow is primarily controlled by the WEC energy capture and less so by scattering. The SWAN model accounts for the frequency-dependent energy capture of the devices and performs well for cases when the wave shadow is primarily controlled by the WEC energy capture. For regular wave cases, inclusion of the wave diffraction process is necessary, but SWAN simulations for wave fields with frequency and directional spreading capture the general character of the wave shadow even without diffraction. Finally, we suggest that WECs designed to operate such that the expected significant wave energy lies at periods near, or larger than, the period of peak energy extraction will minimize the wave shadow effect for a given gross extraction of wave energy, which leads to more efficient arrays with respect to environmental impact.

Keywords

Wave energy converters Arrays Wave scattering Point absorber 

References

  1. Abanades, J., Greaves, D., & Iglesias, G. (2014a). Wave farm impact on the beach profile: A case study. Coastal Engineering, 86, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abanades, J., Greaves, D., & Iglesias, G. (2014b). Coastal defence through wave farms. Coastal Engineering, 91, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexandre, A., Stallard, T., & Stansby, P. K. (2009). Transformation of wave spectra across a line of wave devices. Proceedings of the 8th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC 2009).Google Scholar
  4. Ashton, I. G. C., Johanning, L., & Linfoot, B. (2009). Measurement of the effect of power absorption in the lee of a wave energy converter. Proceedings of OMAE 2009, OMAE2009–79793.Google Scholar
  5. Babarit, A., Hals, J., Muliawan, M. J., Kurniawan, A., Moan, T., & Krokstad, J. (2012). Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters. Renewable Energy, 41, 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babarit, A. (2013). On the park effect in arrays of oscillating wave energy converters. Renewable Energy, 58, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beels, C., Troch, P., De Visch, K., Kofoed, J. P., & De Backer, G. (2010). Application of the time-dependent mild-slope equations for the simulation of wake effects in the lee of a farm of wave dragon wave energy converters. Renewable Energy, 35, 1644–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, C., & Haller, M. C. (2013). Analysis of waves in the near-field of wave energy converter arrays through stereo video, Abstract: OS11C-1657. San Francisco, CA: AGU Fall Meeting.Google Scholar
  9. Booij, N., Ris, R. C., & Holthuijsen, L. H. (1999). A third-generation wave model for coastal regions—1. Model description and validation. Journal Geophysical Research, 104(C4), 7649–7666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borgarino, B., Babarit, A., & Ferrant, P. (2012). Impact of wave interactions effects on energy absorption in large arrays of wave energy converters. Ocean Engineering, 41, 79–88.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, G., Ruehl, K., Jones, C. A., Roberts, J., & Chartrand, C. (2016). Numerical modeling of the effects of wave energy converter characteristics on nearshore wave conditions. Renewable Energy, 89, 636–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatjigeorgiou, I. K. (2011). Three dimensional wave scattering by arrays of elliptical and circular cylinders. Ocean Engineering, 38, 1480–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi, J, Lim, C. H., Lee, J. I. & Yoon S. B. (2009). Evolution of waves and currents over a submerged laboratory shoal. Coastal Engineering, Vol. 56, 297–312.Google Scholar
  14. Day, A. H., Babarit, A., Fontaine, A., He, Y.-P., Kraskowski, M., Mirai, M., et al. (2015). Ocean Engineering, 108, 46–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Andrés, A. D., Guanche, R., Meneses, L., Vidal, C., & Losada, I. J. (2014). Factors that influence array layout on wave energy farms. Ocean Engineering, 82, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksson, M., Waters, R., Svensson, O., Isberg, J., & Leijon, M. (2007). Wave power absorption: Experiments in open sea and simulation. Journal of Applied Physics, 102, 084910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Falcão, A. F. (2010). O., Wave energy utilization: A review of technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 899–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farley, F. J. M., (2011). Far-field theory of wave power capture by oscillating systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1959), 278–287.Google Scholar
  19. Fernandez, H., Iglesias, G., Carballo, R., Castro, A., Fraguela, J. A., Taveira-Pinto, F., et al. (2012). The new wave energy converter WaveCat: Concept and laboratory tests. Marine Structures, 29, 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flocard, F., & Finnigan, T. D. (2010). Laboratory experiments on the power capture of pitching vertical cylinders in waves. Ocean Engineering, 37, 989–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Folley, M., & Whittaker, T. (2013). Validating a spectral-domain model of an OWC using physical model data. International Journal of Marine Energy, 2, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gonzalez-Santamaria, R., Zou, Q. P., & Pan, S. (2013). Impacts of a wave farm on waves, currents and coastal morphology in Southest England. Estuaries and Coasts, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
  23. Haller, M. C., Porter, A., Lenee-Bluhm, P., Rhinefrank, K., Hammagren, E., Özkan-Haller, T. & Newborn, D. (2011). Laboratory observations of waves in the vicinity of WEC-arrays. Proceedings of European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC 2011), Paper No. 419.Google Scholar
  24. Holthuijsen, L., Herman, A. & Booij, N. (2003). Phase-decoupled refraction–diffraction for spectral wave models. Coastal Engineering, 49(4), 291–305.Google Scholar
  25. Ilic, S., van der Westhuysen, A. J., Roelvink, J. A., & Chadwick, A. J. (2007). Multidirectional wave transformation around detached breakwaters. Coastal Engineering, 54, 775–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iturrioz, A., Guanche, R., Armesto, J. A., Alves, M. A., Vidal, C., & Losada, I. J. (2014). Time-domain modeling of a fixed detached oscillating water column towards a floating multi-chamber device. Ocean Engineering, 76, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kara, F. (2016). Time domain prediction of power absorption from ocean waves with wave energy converter arrays. Renewable Energy, 92, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, Y., & Yu, Y.-H. (2012). A synthesis of numerical methods for modeling wave energy converter-point absorbers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 4352–4364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McNatt, J. C., Venugopal, V., & Forehand, D. (2013). The cylindrical wave field of wave energy converters. International Journal of Marine Energy, 3–4, e26–e39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mei, C. C. (2012). Hydrodynamic principles of wave power extraction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 370, 208–234.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendoza, E., Silva, R., Zanuttigh, B., Angelelli, E., Andersen, T. L., Martinelli, L., et al. (2014). Beach response to wave energy converter farms acting as coastal defence. Coastal Engineering, 87, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Millar, D. L., Smith, H. C. M., & Reeve, D. E. (2007). Modelling analysis of the sensitivity of shoreline change to a wave farm. Ocean Engineering, 34(5–6), 884–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nihous, G. C. (2012). Wave power extraction by arbitrary arrays of non-diffracting oscillating water columns. Ocean Engineering, 51, 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Dea, A., Haller, M. C. & Özkan-Haller, H. T. (2015). The impact of wave energy converter arrays on wave-induced forcing in the surf zone. Submitted to Renewable Energy.Google Scholar
  35. Palha, A., Mendes, L., Fortes, C. J., Brito-Melo, A., & Sarmento, A. (2010). The impact of wave energy farms in the shoreline wave climate: Portuguese pilot zone case study using Pelamis energy wave devices. Renewable Energy, 35(1), 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Payne, G. S., Taylor, J. R. M., Bruce, T., & Parkin, P. (2008). Assessment of boundary-element method for modelling a free-floating sloped wave energy device. Part 2: Experimental validation. Ocean Engineering, 35, 342–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Porter, A. K., Haller, M. C. & Lenee-Bluhm, P. (2012). Laboratory observations and numerical modeling of the effects of an array of wave energy converters. Proceedings of 33rd ICCE 2012. Santander, Spain, doi:10.9753/icce.v33.management.67.
  38. Rhinefrank, K., et al. (2013). Benchmark Modeling of the Near-Field and Far-Field Wave Effects of Wave Energy Arrays, Columbia Power Technologies Final Report, DE-EE0002658, U.S. Dept. of Energy, www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1060889/.
  39. Rusu, E., & Guedes, C. (2013). Soares, Coastal impact induced by a Pelamis wave farm operating in the Portuguese nearshore. Renewable Energy, 58, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silverthorne, K. E. & Folley, M. (2013). A new numerical representation of wave energy converters in a spectral wave model. Proceedings of the 10th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC 2013).Google Scholar
  41. Sinha, A., Karmakar, D., & GuedesSoares, C. (2016). Performance of optimally tuned arrays of heaving point absorbers. Renewable Energy, 92, 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, H. C. M., Pearce, C., & Millar, D. L. (2012). Further analysis of change in nearshore wave climate due to an offshore wave farm: an enhanced case study for the Wave Hub site. Renewable Energy, 40(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stratigaki, V., Troch, P., Stallard, T., Forehand, D., Folley, M., Kofoed, J. P., et al. (2015). Sea-state modification and heaving float interaction factors from physical modelling of arrays of wave energy converters. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 7, 061705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tutar, M., & Veci, I. (2016). Performance analysis of a horizontal axis 3-bladed Savonius type wave turbine in an experimental wave flume (EWF). Renewable Energy, 86, 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. WAMIT, Inc., (2000). WAMIT user manual version 6.0, 6.0PC, 5.3S. Available from www.wamit.com.
  46. Waters, R., et al. (2007). Experimental results from sea trials of an offshore wave energy system. Applied Physics Letters, 90, 034105.Google Scholar
  47. Waters, R., et al. (2011). Ocean wave energy absorption in response to wave period and amplitude—Offshore experiments on a wave energy converter. IET Renewable Power Generation, 5(6), 465–469.Google Scholar
  48. Weller, S. D., Stallard, T. J. & Stansby, P. K. (2010). Experimental measurements of irregular wave interaction factors in closely spaced arrays. IET Renewable Power Generation, 4(6), 628–637.Google Scholar
  49. Zijlema, M. (2010). Computation of wind-wave spectra in coastal waters with SWAN on unstructured grids. Coastal Engineering, 57(3), 267–277.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Tuba Özkan-Haller
    • 1
  • Merrick C. Haller
    • 2
  • J. Cameron McNatt
    • 3
  • Aaron Porter
    • 4
  • Pukha Lenee-Bluhm
    • 5
  1. 1.College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.School of Civil and Construction EngineeringOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Mocean EnergyEdinburghUK
  4. 4.Coast and Harbor EngineeringEdmondsUSA
  5. 5.Columbia Power TechnologiesCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations