Marine Hydrokinetic Energy in the Gulf Stream Off North Carolina: An Assessment Using Observations and Ocean Circulation Models
There has been global interest in renewable energy for meeting energy demands, and as these demands increase, it will become of greater importance to utilize low-carbon energy sources to mitigate anthropogenic impact on the environment. Onshore hydropower is responsible for half of the electricity generated by a renewable source in the USA. In the ocean, marine hydrokinetic (MHK) energy in western boundary currents (WBCs) can be considered for electricity generation by submarine turbines. WBCs are a continuous and sustainable source of energy that could be transmitted to shore to support coastal communities in future years. The Gulf Stream is the WBC of the North Atlantic subtropical gyre, and it flows for part of its course along the upper continental slope off the southeastern USA. This large-scale current has maximum flow speeds exceeding 2 m s−1, and this together with its proximity to the coastline distinguishes it as a potential source of MHK energy. Using current data from a moored acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) and a regional ocean circulation model, MHK power densities offshore of North Carolina were found to average 798 W m−2 for the ADCP and 641 W m−2 for the model during a nine-month period at a potential turbine site, a difference of about 20%. The model was shown to have similar current speeds to the ADCP for slowly varying currents (fluctuations of weeks to months due to Gulf Stream path shifts), and lower speeds for higher frequency current variations (fluctuations of several days to a couple of weeks due to wavelike Gulf Stream meanders). This article considers the Gulf Stream as a prospective renewable energy source and assesses the power density of this WBC at multiple locations offshore of North Carolina. Understanding the Stream’s power density character, including its spatial and temporal variations along the North Carolina coast, is essential in considering the Gulf Stream as a future alternative energy resource.
KeywordsPower density Alternative energy Ocean turbine Gulf Stream Cape Hatteras
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the North Carolina Renewable Ocean Energy Program for continued support of MHK energy research off North Carolina. We also appreciate Joe DeCarolis, Billy Edge, Mo Gabr, Harvey Seim, and Jim VanZwieten for their suggestions. Thank you to Patterson Taylor for supplying Fig. 6 and to Zhaoqing Yang and Kevin Haas for their comments that helped improve this chapter.
- Bane, J. M., He, R., Muglia, M., Lowcher, C. F., Gong, Y., & Haines, S. M. (2017). Marine hydrokinetic energy from western boundary currents. Annual Review of Marine Science. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060423. Invited Paper.
- Brown, A., Beiter, P., Heimiller, D., Davidson, C., Denholm, P, Melius, J., et al. (2015). Estimating renewable energy economic potential in the United States: methodology and initial results. Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-64503, Natl. Renew. Energy Lab, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
- Corren, D., Hughes, S., Paquette, J., Sotiropoulos, F., & Calkins, J. (2013). Improved structure and fabrication of large, high-power KHPS rotors. Tech. Rep. DOE/GO18168, Verdant Power, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Imawaki, S., Bower. A., Beal, L., & Qiu, B. (2013). Western boundary currents. In G. Siedler., S. M. Grifies., J. Gould & J. A. Church (Eds.), Ocean Circulation and Climate: A 21st Century Perspective, 2nd ed. (pp. 305–38).Oxford, UK: Academic.Google Scholar
- Kabir, A., Lemongo-Tchamba, I., & Fernandez, A. (2015). An assessment of available ocean current hydrokinetic energy near the North Carolina shore. Renewable Energy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.011.
- Li, B., Bane, J., DeCarolis, J. F., Neary, V., de Queiroz, A. R., & Keeler, A. G. (2017). The economics of ocean current energy: a Gulf stream case study. Submitted to Nature Energy.Google Scholar
- Luettich, R. A., Birkhahn, R. H., & Westerink, J. J. (1991). Application of ADCIRC-2DDI to Masonboro Inlet, North Carolina: A brief numerical modeling study, Contractors Report to the US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, August 1991.Google Scholar
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2012). Renewable Electricity Futures Study. Hand, M. M., Baldwin, S., DeMeo, E., Reilly, J. M., Mai, T., Arent, D., Porro, G., Meshek, M., Sandor, D. (Eds.), 4 vols. NREL/TP-6A20-52409. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Neary, V. S., Previsic, M., Jepsen, R. A., Lawson, M. J., Yu, Y.-H., et al. (2014). Reference model 4 (RM4): ocean current turbine. In V. Neary, M. Previsic, R. A. Jepsen, M. J. Lawson, Y.-H. Yu, et al. (Eds.), Methodology for Design and Economic Analysis of Marine Energy Conversion (MEC) Technologies (pp. 180–228). Albuquerque, NM: Sandia Natl. Lab.Google Scholar
- VanZwieten, J. H., Duerr, A. E. S., Alsenas, G. M., & Hanson, H. P. (2013). Global ocean current energy assessment: an initial look. In Proceedings of the 1st Marine Energy Technology Symposium, April 10–11, Washington, DC. http://www.globalmarinerenewable.com/images/global%20ocean%20current%20energy%20assessment%20an%20initial%20look.pdf.