Skip to main content

‘All the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects’: Māori and Citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Citizenship in Transnational Perspective

Part of the book series: Politics of Citizenship and Migration ((POCM))

Abstract

Article 3 of the Treaty of Waitangi, signed by Māori leaders and the British Crown in 1840, stated that Māori would enjoy ‘all the rights and privileges of British subjects.’ This new citizenship of a British colony was laid over the top of Māori forms of social organisation and understandings of nationhood and citizenship. The New Zealand state has struggled to come to terms with Indigenous forms of citizenship and over time has changed its approach to Māori citizenship to try to address this. This essay considers the nature of Māori citizenship today in the era of Treaty of Waitangi settlements, exploring how citizenship in this period of transitional justice is informed by political, social, and justice dimensions of conceptions of Māori citizenship over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Angela Ballara, Iwi: The Dynamics of Māori Tribal Organisation from c. 1769 to c. 1945, (Wellington, N.Z.: Victoria University Press, 1998), 17.

  2. 2.

    Ibid ., 279.

  3. 3.

    Louise Humpage, “Revision required: Reconciling New Zealand citizenship with Māori nationalisms,” National Identities 10 (2008), 251.

  4. 4.

    John Wallace, John Darwin, Kenneth Keith, Richard Mulgan, and Whetumarama Wereta, Report Royal Commission on the Electoral System: Towards a Better Democracy, (December 1986).

  5. 5.

    Vincent O’Malley “English Law and the Māori Response: a case study from the Runanga system in Northland, 1861-65,” Journal of the Polynesian Society 116 (2007), 7.

  6. 6.

    Alan Ward “Law and law-enforcement on the New Zealand frontier, 1840–1893” NZ Journal of History 5, 2 (1971), 128.

  7. 7.

    Judith Binney, “Te Kooti Arikirangi Te Turuki” in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography, Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Available: http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/biographies/1t45/te-kooti-arikirangi-te-turuki

  8. 8.

    Humpage, “Revision Required,” 252.

  9. 9.

    Waitangi Tribunal, Te Whānau o Waipareira Report (Wellington: GP Publications, 1998).

  10. 10.

    Waitangi Tribunal, Whaia te Mana Motuhake. – In Pursuit of Mana Motuhake: Report on the Māori Community Development Act (Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal, 2014).

  11. 11.

    Waitangi Tribunal, Te Whanau o Waipareira Report, (Wellington: GP publications, 1998), 6.

  12. 12.

    Ibid ., 6.

  13. 13.

    Ibid ., 14.

  14. 14.

    Ibid .

  15. 15.

    Ibid .

  16. 16.

    Ibid .

  17. 17.

    Ibid .

  18. 18.

    Ibid ., 218.

  19. 19.

    New Zealand Law Commission, Māori Custom and Values in New Zealand Law (Wellington, 2001).

  20. 20.

    Kirsty Gover, Tribal Constitutionalism: states, tribes and the governance of membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).

  21. 21.

    John Borrows, Canada’s indigenous constitution (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2010), 23–58.

  22. 22.

    For further discussion of the issues confronted by Indigenous Peoples in terms of the institutional supremacy of the nation-state, see Bruce Duthu, Shadow Nations: Tribal Sovereignty and the Limits of Legal Pluralism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).

  23. 23.

    Hon Justice Joseph Williams, Property or interests, private or public? Administrative Law Intensive, New Zealand Law Society (2011).

Bibliography

  • Adds, P., Bonisch-Brednich, B., Hill, R., and Whimp, G. eds. Reconciliation, Representation and Indigeneity: ‘Biculturalism’ in Aotearoa New Zealand. Heidelberg: Universitatsverlag Winter, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballara, Angela. Iwi: The Dynamics of Māori Tribal Organisation from c. 1769 to c. 1945. Wellington, NZ: Victoria University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binney, Judith. “Te Kooti Arikirangi Te Turuki” in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography, Te Ara - the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Available: http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/biographies/1t45/te-kooti-arikirangi-te-turuki

  • Borrows, John. Canada’s Indigenous Constitution. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durie, Mason. Te Mana, Te Kawanatanga: The Politics of Māori Self-Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duthu, Bruce. Shadow Nations: Tribal Sovereignty and the Limits of Legal Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gover, Kirsty. Tribal Constitutionalism: states, tribes and the governance of membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickford, Mark. Lords of the Land: Indigenous Property Rights and the Jurisprudence of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Richard. Māori and the State: Crown-Māori Relations in New Zealand/Aotearoa, 1950-2000. Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humpage, Louise. “Revision required: Reconciling New Zealand citizenship with Māori nationalisms.” National Identities 10, 247–261 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Law Commission. Māori Custom and Values in New Zealand Law. (Wellington, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Malley, Vincent. “English Law and the Māori Response: a case study from the Runanga system in Northland, 1861-65.” Journal of the Polynesian Society. 116, 7–34 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, Māmari. “A Loving Excavation: Uncovering the Constitutional Culture of the Māori Demos” New Zealand Universities Law Review 25(4), 820–843 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, James. Public Philosophy in a New Key. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waitangi Tribunal. Te Whānau o Waipareira Report. Wellington: GP Publications, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waitangi Tribunal. Whaia Te Mana Motuhake – In Pursuit of Mana Motuhake: Report on the Māori Community Development Act. Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J., Darwin, J., Keith, K., Mulgan, R., and Whetumarama Wereta. Report - Royal Commission on the Electoral System: Towards a Better Democracy. December 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Alan. “Law and law-enforcement on the New Zealand frontier, 1840-1893.” NZ Journal of History. 5, 2 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Hon Justice Joseph. “Property or interests, private or public?” Administrative Law Intensive. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Law Society (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. and Yeatman, A. eds. Justice & Identity: Antipodean Practices. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, C., Linkhorn, C. (2017). ‘All the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects’: Māori and Citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand. In: Mann, J. (eds) Citizenship in Transnational Perspective. Politics of Citizenship and Migration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53529-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics