Abstract
The quick response strategy has been widely adopted in the fashion industry. With a shortened lead time, quick response allows fashion supply chain members to conduct forecast information updating which helps to reduce demand uncertainty. In the big data era, forecast information updating is even more effective as more data points can be collected easily to improve forecasting. In this paper, after reviewing the related literature, we explore how the quick response strategy with n observations can improve the whole fashion supply chain’s performance. We study how the number of observations affects the expected values of quick response for the fashion supply chain, the fashion retailer, and the fashion manufacturer. Then, we analytically how the robust win–win coordination can be achieved in the quick response fashion supply chain using the commonly seen wholesale pricing markdown contract. Insights are generated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
This concept is in line with the “advance booking scheme” (see, e.g., McCardle et al. 2004).
- 2.
References
G. Cachon, R. Swinney, The value of fast fashion: quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior. Manag. Sci. 57, 778–795 (2011)
H.L. Chan, T.M. Choi, C.L. Hui, S.F. Ng, Quick response healthcare apparel supply chains: value of RFID and coordination. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Syst. 45, 887–890 (2015)
H.K. Chan, T.M. Choi, X. Yue, Big data analytics: risk and operations management for industrial applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 12, 1214–1218 (2016)
R.R. Chen, T.C.E. Cheng, T.M. Choi, Y. Wang, Novel advances in applications of the newsvendor model. Decis. Sci. 47(1), 8–10 (2016a)
S. Chen, H. Lee, K. Moinzadeh, Supply chain coordination with multiple shipments: the optimal inventory subsidizing contracts. Oper. Res. 64, 1320–1337 (2016b)
C.H. Chiu, T.M. Choi, C.S. Tang, Price, rebate, and returns supply contracts for coordinating supply chains with price dependent demands. Prod. Oper. Manag. 20, 81–91 (2011)
T.M. Choi, Pre-season stocking and pricing decisions for fashion retailers with multiple information updating. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 106, 146–170 (2007)
T.M. Choi, Local sourcing and fashion quick response system: the impacts of carbon footprint tax. Transp. Res. Part E 55, 43–54 (2013)
T.M. Choi Impacts of retailer’s risk averse behaviors on quick response fashion supply chain systems. Ann. Oper. Res. (2016a), in press. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2257-6
T.M. Choi, Incorporating social media observations and bounded rationality into fashion quick response supply chains in the big data era. Transp. Res. Part E (2016b), in press. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2016.11.006
T.M. Choi, Inventory service target in quick response fashion retail supply chains. Serv. Sci. 8(4), 406–419 (2016c)
T.M. Choi, P.S. Chow, Mean-variance analysis of quick response programme. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 114, 456–475 (2008)
T.M. Choi, S. Sethi, Innovative quick response programs: a review. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 127, 1–12 (2010)
T.M. Choi, D. Li, H. Yan, Optimal Two-stage ordering policy with Bayesian information updating. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54(8), 846–859 (2003)
T.M. Choi, D. Li, H. Yan, Optimal single ordering policy with multiple delivery modes and Bayesian information updates. Comput. Oper. Res. 31, 1965–1984 (2004)
T.M. Choi, D. Li, H. Yan, Quick response policy with Bayesian information updates. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170, 788–808 (2006)
T.M. Choi, H.K. Chan, X. Yue, Recent development in big data analytics for business operations and risk management. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 47, 81–92 (2016a). doi:10.1109/TCYB.2015.2507599
T.M. Choi, T.C.E. Cheng, X. Zhao, Multi-methodological research in operations management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 25(3), 379–389 (2016b)
K.L. Donohue, Efficient supply contract for fashion goods with forecast updating and two production modes. Manag. Sci. 46, 1397–1411 (2000)
P. Fernando J. Gómez, M.G. Filho, Complementing lean with quick response manufacturing: case studies. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, in press. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9513-4
M. Fisher, A. Raman, Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales. Oper. Res. 44, 87–99 (1996)
A.V. Iyer, M.E. Bergen, Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels. Manag. Sci. 43, 559–570 (1997)
H.S. Kim, A Bayesian analysis on the effect of multiple supply options in a quick response environment. Nav. Res. Logist. 50, 1–16 (2003)
C.H. Lee, T.M. Choi, T.C.E. Cheng, Selling to strategic and loss-averse consumers: stocking, procurement, and product design policies. Nav. Res. Logist. 62, 435–453 (2015)
Y.T. Lin, A. Parlakturk, Quick response under competition. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21(3), 518–533 (2012)
Z. Liu, A. Nagurney, Supply chain networks with global outsourcing and quick-response production under demand and cost uncertainty. Ann. Oper. Res. 208(1), 251–289 (2013)
K. McCardle, K. Rajaram, C.S. Tang, Advance booking discount programs under retail competition. Manag. Sci. 50, 701–708 (2004)
D.S. Shaltayev, C.R. Sox, The impact of market state information on inventory performance. Int. J. Inventory Res. 1, 93–124 (2010)
B. Shen, T.M. Choi, K.Y. Lo, Markdown money policy in the textile and clothing industry: China vs U.S.A. Sustainability 8(1), 31 (2016)
J.J. Spengler, Vertical restraints and antitrust policy. J. Polit. Econ. 58, 347–352 (1950)
D. Yang, T.M. Choi, T. Xiao, T.C.E. Cheng, Coordinating a two-supplier and one-retailer supply chain with forecast updating. Automatica 47, 1317–1329 (2011)
Acknowledgments
The author thanks the reviewers for their comments on the earlier draft of this paper. This paper is partially supported by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University’s funding (grant number: G-YBGR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
A.1 Appendix: All Proofs
A.1 Appendix: All Proofs
Proof of Lemma 2.1.
(a) By directly comparing between the cases of QR and SR, the demand uncertainty under QR (with n-observation based information updating) is always smaller than the demand uncertainty under SR. By differentiation, we can find that d 1(n) is decreasing in n, which implies the demand uncertainty reduction ((d 0 + δ) − (d 1(n) + δ)) is increasing in n. (b) When n → ∞, \( \underset{n\to \infty }{ \lim }{d}_1(n)=\frac{d_0\delta }{nd_0+\delta }=0 \) and hence the demand uncertainty under QR (d 1(n) + δ) becomes δ. (Q.E.D.)
Proof of Lemma 3.1.
(a) First of all, from (14.8), we have EVQR SC (n)=\( \left(\sqrt{d_0+\delta }-\sqrt{d_1(n)+\delta}\right){T}_{SC}\left({s}_{SC}\right) \). From (14.3), we have:
At Time 0, since the expected product leftover by the end of the season can be expressed as \( \sqrt{d_0+\delta}\left\{{\Phi}^{-1}\left({s}_{SC}\right)+\Psi \left[{\Phi}^{-1}\left({s}_{SC}\right)\right]\right\} \), which must be non-zero in the model we considered in this paper, we thus have:
Put (14.31) into (14.30) implies that T SC (s SC ) > 0. Since \( \left(\sqrt{d_0{+}\delta }{-}\sqrt{d_1(n){+}\delta}\right)>0 \), from (14.31), we have: EVQR SC (n)=\( \left(\sqrt{d_0+\delta }-\sqrt{d_1(n)+\delta}\right){T}_{SC}\left({s}_{SC}\right)>0 \).
(b) Differentiate EVQR SC (n)=\( \left(\sqrt{d_0+\delta }-\sqrt{d_1(n)+\delta}\right){T}_{SC}\left({s}_{SC}\right) \) with respect to n reveals that dEVQR SC (n)/dn > 0.
(c) When n → ∞, from Lemma 2.1, we have: d 1(n) = 0, and hence EVQR SC (n → ∞)=\( \left(\sqrt{d_0+\delta }-\sqrt{\delta}\right){T}_{SC}\left({s}_{SC}\right) \). (Q.E.D.)
Proof of Lemma 4.1.
Similar to the Proof of Lemma 3.1. (Q.E.D.)
Proof of Lemma 4.2.
Notice that Φ−1(s R ) < 0 if and only if s R < 0.5 and Φ−1(s R ) ≥ 0 if and only if s R ≥ 0.5. Then, Lemma 4.2 can be proven by following the same approach as in the proofs of Lemmas 3.1 and 4.1. (Q.E.D.)
Proof of Lemma 4.3.
When c > p, by direct observations from the analytical expressions, we have:q 0 , R∗<q 0 , SC∗ and q 1 , R∗|μ 1(n)<q 1 , SC∗|μ 1(n). (Q.E.D.)
Proof of Lemma 5.1.
(a) By equating \( {q}_{1,R\ast}^{\Omega}\Big|{\mu}_1(n) \) and q 1 , SC∗|μ 1(n), we know that \( {q}_{1,R\ast}^{\Omega}\Big|{\mu}_1(n)= \) q 1 , SC∗|μ 1(n) if and only if \( \widehat{m}=m\ast \). (b) Checking the first order derivative reveals that \( {EVQR}_R^{\Omega}\left(n|\widehat{m}=m\ast \right) \) is a decreasing function of \( \widehat{c} \), and \( {EVQR}_S^{\Omega}\left(n|\widehat{m}=m\ast \right) \) is an increasing function of \( \widehat{c} \). (Q.E.D.)
Proof of Lemma 5.2.
Directly implied by using Lemma 5.1. (Q.E.D.)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Choi, TM. (2017). Quick Response Fashion Supply Chains in the Big Data Era. In: Choi, TM., Gao, J., Lambert, J., Ng, CK., Wang, J. (eds) Optimization and Control for Systems in the Big-Data Era. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 252. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53518-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53518-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53516-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53518-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)