Skip to main content
Book cover

Birds of Prey and Wind Farms pp 97–148Cite as

Telemetric Monitoring of Montagu’s Harrier in Schleswig-Holstein

Abstract

The behaviour of breeding Montagu’s harriers towards wind farms in Schleswig-Holstein in Northern Germany was investigated in a two years telemetry study. A total of 11 breeding birds were fitted with VHF transmitters. The home ranges varied between 340 and 1560 ha (kernel). Males had larger home ranges than females. Centres of flight activity (50% kernel) were in the surroundings of nests and comprised between 41 and 252 ha. The salt marshes of the intertidal zone and large extensive grasslands rich in ecotones were important foraging grounds. Wind farms within the home range were used without avoidance of the close-up area of wind turbines. The intensity of use depended on location and distance of wind turbines from the centre of activity (nest) and available foraging grounds. The results gave no hint of displacement effects in the selection of the nest site or avoidance behaviour in the use of the habitat. 60–70% of the flight heights of Montagu’s harriers were below 10 m, rarely reaching the risk area of currently installed wind turbines. Flight activities in critical heights were concentrated on the nest site with 50% of the recorded locations within a radius of 182–497 m around the nest. With increasing distance from the nest, the flight activity per area was decreasing considerably. Due to hunting flights, mainly below 10 m height, low collision risk occured in the periphery of the home range. The distance between nest and wind turbine was a decisive factor for the collision risk. Habitat management concepts in order to lower the collision risk by relocating breeding sites to locations outside the impact range of wind turbines and by channeling flight activity along suitable created foraging grounds are discussed.

Keywords

  • Home Range
  • Salt Marsh
  • Wind Turbine
  • Nest Site
  • Wind Farm

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53402-2_4
  • Chapter length: 52 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-53402-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 4.1
Fig. 4.2
Fig. 4.3
Fig. 4.4
Fig. 4.5
Fig. 4.6
Fig. 4.7
Fig. 4.8
Fig. 4.9
Fig. 4.10
Fig. 4.11
Fig. 4.12
Fig. 4.13
Fig. 4.14
Fig. 4.15
Fig. 4.16
Fig. 4.17
Fig. 4.18
Fig. 4.19
Fig. 4.20
Fig. 4.21
Fig. 4.22
Fig. 4.23

References

  • Arroyo B, Mougeot F, Pinilla A, Crystal F, Guerrero A (2009) Home Range Sizes and Foraging Habitat Selection in the Montagu’s Harrier (Circus pygargus): Implications for Conservation Management. Proceedings of Raptor Research Foundation Annual Conference, Pitlockry, 29 Sep–4 Oct 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Band W, Madders M, Whitfield DP (2007) Developing field and analytical methods to assess avian collision risk at wind farms. In: de Lucas M, Janss G, Ferrer M (eds) Birds and Wind Power. Quercus, Madrid, p 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum R, Baum S (2011) Wiesenweihen in der Falle. Beobachtungen in einem ostfriesischen Windpark. Falke 58:230–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belting C, Krüger RM (2002) Populationsentwicklung und Schutzstrategien für die Wiesenweihe Circus pygargus in Bayern. Ornithologischer Anzeiger 41:87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (ed) (2004) Birds in Europe: Population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright JA, Langston RHW, Bullman R, Evans RJ, Gardner S, Pearce-Higgins J, Wilson E (2006) Bird Sensitivity Map to provide locational guidance for onshore wind farms in Scotland. RSPB Research Report No 20, Sandy, pp 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain DE, Rehfisch M, Fox A, Desholm M, Anthony SJ (2006) The effect of avoidance rates on bird mortality predictions made by wind turbine collision risk models. Ibis 148:198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke R (1996) Montagu’s Harrier. Arlequin Press, Chelmsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner LM, Plowman BW (2001) Using Euclidean distances to assess nonrandom habitat use. In: Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM (eds) Radio Tracking and Animal Populations. Academic Press, New York, pp 474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner LM, Smith MD, Burger LW (2003) A comparison of distance based and classification-based analysis of habitat use. Ecology 84:526–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1980) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol II, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 695.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Voogd M (2004) Hunting Yield and Habitat Use in the Montagu’s Harrier. Master thesis, University of Groníngen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr T (2007) Vogelverluste an WKA in Deutschland und Fledermausverluste weltweit. Summe der Funde seit 1989. Stand April 2007. Daten aus dem Archiv der Staatlichen Vogelschutzwarte im Landesamt für Umwelt, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz Brandenburg. Accessed 26 April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr T (2013) Vogelverluste an WKA in Deutschland und Fledermausverluste weltweit. Summe der Funde seit 1989. Stand April 2013. Daten aus dem Archiv der Staatlichen Vogelschutzwarte im Landesamt für Umwelt, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz Brandenburg. http://www.lugv.brandenburg.de/cms/detail.php/bb1.c.321381.de. Accessed 30 April 2013.

  • Gahrau C (2011) Untersuchungen zur Brutbiologie der Wiesenweihe (Circus pygargus) in Schleswig-Holstein. Bachelor thesis, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahrau C., Schmüser H (2012): Artenschutzprojekt Wiesenweihe (Circus pygargus) des Landes Schleswig-Holstein. Abschlussbericht zur Brutperiode 2011. Wildtierkataster Schleswig-Holstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia JT, Arroyo BE (2005) Food-niche differentiation in sympatric Hen Circus cyaneus and Montagu’s Harriers Circus pygargus. Ibis 147:144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (1971) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Vol 4 Falconiformes. Aula Verlag, Wiebelsheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz-Kleptow C, Schmüser H (2013) Wiesenweihe. In: Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft und ländliche Räume Schleswig-Holstein (ed) Jagd- und Artenschutz Jahresbericht 2013, p 103–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höntsch K (2004) Der Kleinspecht. Autökologie einer bestandsbedrohten Vogelart im hessischen Vordertaunus. Dissertation, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität of Frankfurt/M. M.-G.-Schmitz-Verlag, Kelkheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joest R, Griesenbrock B, Illner H (2013) Auswirkungen von Windenergieanlagen auf den Bestand und die Nistplatzwahl der Wiesenweihe Circus pygargus in der Hellwegbörde, Nordrhein-Westfalen. In: Hötker H, Krone O, Nehls G (eds) Greifvögel und Windkraftanlagen: Problemanalyse und Lösungsvorschläge. Schlussbericht für das Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Michael-Otto-Institut im NABU, Leibniz-Institut für Zoo- und Wildtierforschung, BioConsult SH, Bergenhusen, Berlin, Husum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward RE (2001) A Manual for Radio Tagging. Academic Press, New York, pp 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernohan BJ, Millspaugh JJ, Jenks JA, Naugle DE (1998): Use of home range estimators in a GIS environmentto identify habitat use patterns. J. Environmental Management 53: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liminana R, Soutullo A, Urios V, Surroca M (2006) Vegetation height selection in Montagu’s Harriers Circus pygargus breeding in a natural habitat. Ardea 94:280–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looft V, Busche G (1980) Vogelwelt Schleswig-Holsteins 2 - Greifvögel. Karl Wachholtz Neumünster, pp.83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen K, Mammen U, Resetariz A (2013) Rotmilan. In: Hötker H, Krone O, Nehls G (eds) Greifvögel und Windkraftanlagen: Problemanalyse und Lösungsvorschläge. Schlussbericht für das Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Michael-Otto-Institut im NABU, Leibniz-Institut für Zoo- und Wildtierforschung, BioConsult SH, Bergenhusen, Berlin, Husum, http://www.nabu.de/themen/energie/erneuerbareenergien/windkraft/17417.html, Accessed 30 June 2014.

  • McNay RS, Morgan JA, Bunnell EL (1994) Characterizing independence of observations in  movements of Columbian black-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 58: 422–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mebs T, Schmidt D (2006) Die Greifvögel Europas, Nordafrikas und Vorderasiens. Kosmos, Stuttgart, pp 495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon A, Bourrioux JL, Riols C, Bretagnolle V (2002) Comparative breeding biology of Hen Harrier and Montagu’s Harrier: an 8-year study in north-eastern France. Ibis 144:94–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM (eds) (2001) Radio Tracking and Animal Populations. Academic Press, New York, pp 474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr CO, Stumpf WA (1966): Comparison of methods for calculating areas of animal activity. Journal of Wildlife Management30: 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu CW, Byers CR, Peek JM (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization availability data. J Wildlife Manage 38:541–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue B, O’Donoghue TA, King F (2011) The hen harrier in Ireland: Conservation issues for the 21st century. Biol Environ 111B: 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pürkhauer C, Hoh E, Klein H, Krüger R, Leuchs O, Pauldrach G (2009) Einsatz für die Wiesenweihe. Falke 56:419–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasran L, Grajetzky B, Mammen U (2013) Berechnungen zur Kollisionswahrscheinlichkeit von territorialen Greifvögeln mit Windkraftanlagen. In: Hötker H, Krone O, Nehls G (eds) Greifvögel und Windkraftanlagen: Problemanalyse und Lösungsvorschläge. Schlussbericht für das Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Michael-Otto-Institut im NABU, Leibniz-Institut für Zoo- und Wildtierforschung, BioConsult SH, Bergenhusen, Berlin, Husum, http://www.nabu.de/themen/energie/erneuerbareenergien/windkraft/17417.html, Accessed 30 June 2014.

  • Salomolard M (1997) Utilisation de l’espacepur le Busard cendre Circus pygargus: Superficie et distribution des zones de chasse. Alauda 65:307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmüser H, Gahrau C (2011) Artenschutzprojekt Wiesenweihe (Circus pygargus) des Landes Schleswig-Holstein. Abschlussbericht zur Brutperiode 2010 im Auftrag Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1981) An empirically based estimate of home range. Theoretical Population Biology 20: 281–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Slade, NA (1985) Influence of sampling intervalon estimatesof home range size. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:1019–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Slade NA (1997) On testing for independence of animal movements. J Agr Biol Envir St 2:48–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Südbeck P, Bauer HG, Boschert M, Boye P, Knief W (2009) Rote Liste und Gesamtartenliste der Brutvögel (Aves) Deutschlands. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 70(1): 159–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trierweiler C, Drent RH, Komdeur J, Koks BJ (2010) Home range size and habitat selection of the endangered Montagu’s harrier Circus pygargus in NW-Europe: implications for conservation. In: Trierweiler C (ed) Travels to feed and food to breed: The annual cycle of a migratory raptor, Montagu’s harrier, in a modern world. Dissertation, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser E, Koks B, Trierweiler C, Arisz J, van der Leij RJ (2006) Grauwe Kiekendieven Circus pygargus in Nederland in 2006. De Takkeling 15: 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DP, Madders M (2006a) Flight height in the Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus and its incorporation in wind turbine collision risk modelling. Natural Research Information Note 2, Natural Research, Banchory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DP, Madders M (2006b) A review of the impacts of wind farms on the Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus and an estimation of collision avoidance rates. Natural Research Information Note 1. Natural Research, Banchory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worton BJ (1987) A rewiew of models of home range for animal movement. Ecological modelling 38:277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home range studies. Ecology 70:164–168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BioConsult SH, Schobüller Str. 36, 25813, Husum, Germany

    Bodo Grajetzky & Georg Nehls

Authors
  1. Bodo Grajetzky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Georg Nehls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bodo Grajetzky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Michael-Otto-Institut im NABU , Bergenhusen, Germany

    Hermann Hötker

  2. Leibniz-Institut für Zoo-und Wildtierforschung, Berlin, Germany

    Oliver Krone

  3. BioConsult SH GmbH & CoKG , Husum, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

    Georg Nehls

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grajetzky, B., Nehls, G. (2017). Telemetric Monitoring of Montagu’s Harrier in Schleswig-Holstein. In: Hötker, H., Krone, O., Nehls, G. (eds) Birds of Prey and Wind Farms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53402-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53402-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53401-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53402-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)