Skip to main content

Police Liaison Approaches to Managing Political Protest: A Critical Analysis of a Prominent UK Example

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The case study presented in this chapter focuses on the work of a 15-person Police Liaison Team in relation to a large-scale political protest in the major English city of Sheffield in March 2011. The chapter utilises participant observation and interview data, and initially employs the author’s Flashpoints Model of Public Disorder to emphasise how a combination of contextual factors and dynamic processes—underpinned by a strong Community Policing orientation—were conducive to a highly permissive style of policing, which strove to facilitate the protest’s main objectives. The same body of data is also used to address the cynical suggestion that this particular style of policing actually constitutes a ‘sham’, insofar as it is chiefly designed to secure the protesters’ compliance with the police’s own agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACPO/ACPOS/NPIA (Association of Chief Police Officers, Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland, National Police Improvement Agency) (2010) Manual of guidance on keeping the peace. National Police Improvement Agency, Wyboton, Bedfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker D (2014) Police and protester dialog: safeguarding the peace or ritualistic sham? Int J Comp Appl Crim Justice 38(1):83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury J, Reicher SD (2000) Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities. Br J Soc Psychol 39: 579–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorringe H, Rosie M, Waddington D, Kominou M (2012a) Facilitating ineffective protest? The policing of the 2009 Edinburgh NATO protests. Policing Soc 22(2):115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorringe H, Stott C, Rosie M (2012b) Dialogue police, decision making and the management of public order during protest crowd events. Invest Psychol Offender Profiling 9(2):111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer C, McLaughlin E (2010) We predict a riot? Public order policing, new media environments and the rise of the citizen journalist. Br J Criminol 50(6):1041–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Chief Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMCIC) (2009a) Adapting to protest. HMIC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Chief Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMCIC) (2009b) Adapting to protest: nurturing the British model of policing. HMIC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holgersson S, Knutsson J (2011) Dialogue policing: a means for less crowd violence. In: Madensen TD, Knutsson J (eds) Preventing crowd violence. Lynne Rienner Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McSeveny K, Waddington D (2011) Up close and personal: the interplay between information technology and human agency in the policing of the 2011 Sheffield anti-Lib Dem protest. In: Akghar B, Yates S (eds) Intelligence management (Knowledge driven frameworks for combating terrorism and organised crime). Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran M, Waddington DP (2016) Riots: an international comparison. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher SD, Stott C, Cronin P, Adang O (2004) An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order policing. Policing Int J Police Strat Manage 17(4):558–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher S, Stott C, Drury J, Adang O, Cronin P, Livingstyone A (2007) Knowledge-based public order policing: principles and practice. Policing 1:403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosie M, Gorringe H (2009) What a difference a death makes: protest, policing and the press at the G20. Sociol Res Online 14:5. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/14/5/4.html

  • Stott C (2009) Crowd psychology and public order policing: an overview of scientific theory and evidence. Submission to the HMIC of public protest review team. University of Liverpool, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott C, Drury J (2000) Crowds, context and identity: dynamic categorization processes in the “poll tax riot”. Hum Relat 53:247–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott C, Scothern M, Gorringe H (2013) Advances in Liaison based public order policing in England: human rights and negotiating the management of protest. Policing Int J Police Strat Manage 7(10):210–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington DP (1992) Contemporary issues in public disorder: a comparative and historical approach. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington DP (2007) Policing public disorder: theory and practice. Willan, Devon

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington DP (2010) Applying the flashpoints model of public disorder to the 2001 Bradford riot. Br J Criminol 50(2):342–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington DP (2011a) Policing the British G8 protests: a contextualized analysis. In: Madensen TD, Knutsson J (eds) Preventing crowd violence. Lynne Rienner Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington DP (2011b) Public order policing in South Yorkshire, 1984–2011: the case for a permissive approach to crowd control. Contemp Soc Sci 6(3):309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington DP (2013) “A kinder blue”: analysing the police management of the Sheffield anti-“Lib Dem” protest of March 2011. Policing Soc 23(1):46–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington DP (2016) From iron fists to “bunches of fives”: a critical reflection on dialogue (or liaison) approaches to policing political protest. Eur Police Sci Res Bull Spec Conf Ed Number 1:30–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington DP, Jones K, Critcher C (1989) Flashpoints: studies in public disorder. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington PAJ (1994) Liberty and order: public order policing in a capital city. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington PAJ (1998) Controlling protest in contemporary historical and comparative perspective. In Della Porta D, Reiter H (eds) Policing protest: the control of mass demonstrations in western democracies. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlström M (2007) Forestalling violence: police knowledge of interaction with political activists. Mobilization 12(4):389–402

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Waddington .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waddington, D. (2017). Police Liaison Approaches to Managing Political Protest: A Critical Analysis of a Prominent UK Example. In: Bayerl, P., Karlović, R., Akhgar, B., Markarian, G. (eds) Community Policing - A European Perspective. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53396-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53396-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53395-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53396-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics