Skip to main content

Teleological Reasoning in Economics

  • 400 Accesses

Part of the Virtues and Economics book series (VIEC,volume 1)

Abstract

The prime example of a teleological approach to economics can be found in the first part of Aristotle’s Politics. He defines economics as the art of creating the material and social conditions for the survival of the oikos or household. Simultaneously, he integrates economics in a social matrix that subordinates economics to politics and ethics. Modern philosophy and economics is anti-Aristotelian and anti-teleological. Modern economic actors are supposed to be driven by autonomous preferences and free choices. The market functions as a causal equilibrium mechanism that promote welfare for everyone as an unintended byproduct. Although Adam Smith interpreted this unintended teleological effect as an ‘invisible hand ’, he was one of the first moral philosophers to underpin this order with a non-teleological substratum. After him, the deconstruction of teleology pursued its logic giving way to the idea of economics as a process of ‘creative destruction’ (Schumpeter). The paper explores how thinking economics as a relational dynamic opens a space for human creativity without losing the embeddedness in an ecological system of meaning and purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Just as there is a strict demarcation and hierarchy between the celestial/divine and the terrestrial/human sphere, there must be a clear demarcation and hierarchy between politics and economics.

  2. 2.

    In a social context with many rational actors and managers , the free market offers a solution. Instead of claiming a super rational manager who transforms the state into a despotic regime, the market introduces a system of free exchange where all rational actors can try to make a benefit without manipulating the other or imposing his/her will.

  3. 3.

    Although I have some problems with other parts of the encyclical, chapter 3 of which has been strongly influenced by the ideas of Stefano Zamagni , it is a challenging piece of economic philosophy. For an analysis of the encyclical see Bouckaert 2012.

  4. 4.

    Economy of communion is a concept and a practice launched by Chiara Lubich in 1991 at Sao Paulo and promoted by the Focolare movement.

  5. 5.

    Philosophers as J. Maritain (1936) and E. Mounier (1936) and especially Jewish philosophers as H. Bergson, M. Buber, S. Weil, F. Rozenzweig and E. Levinas opened a new metaphysical perspective originating from personal experiences of deep interconnectedness and leading to social relations of dialogue, social responsibility and servant leadership. See Personalism (Bouckaert 2011b).

  6. 6.

    According to Lietaer and Dunne (2013) worldwide over 4000 complementary currencies are brought into use. Alternative currencies are not new. During the crisis of the 1930 ‘s, there were some successful introductions. But most of them did not succeed because national authorities did not accept them as a means for legal payment. One exception is the WIR in Switzerland which is still in use. To-day governments actively support new experiments. Some are designed for the development of local economy and employment such as the LETS (Local Exchange Trading System) which in France are known as Grain de Sel (SEL). Others are intended to stimulate local systems of social care as e.g. the ‘Caring Relationship Tickets” or Hureai Kippu in Japan (1995). A third category of currencies started to meet unmet needs in a local community such as e.g. the PEN exchange in Takoma Park (US).

  7. 7.

    A fuller treatment of alternative currency is beyond the scope of this paper.

  8. 8.

    The spirit is the human faculty that relates us in a non-conceptual and intuitive way to all living beings and to Life as the transcendent Source in all of them.

References

  • Aristotle. The Politics (written 335–323 BC), published in Penguin Classics, 1962, 1981, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, X.V.I. 2009. Caritas in Veritate. Vaticana: Liberia Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, L. 1998. The Ethics of Interest. A Cultural-Historical Perspective. In Working Across Cultures. Ethical Perspectives for Intercultural Management, eds. H. Lange, A. Löhr, and H.D. Steinmann, 305–321. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Rational Versus Spiritual Concepts of Frugality. In Frugality. Rebalancing Material and Spiritual Values in Economic Life, eds. L. Bouckaert, H. Opdebeeck, and L. Zsolnai, 27–45. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011a. Spirituality and Rationality. In The Palgrave Handbook of Spirituality and Business, eds. L. Bouckaert and L. Zsolnai, 18–26. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Personalism. In The Palgrave Handbook of Spirituality and Business, eds. L. Bouckaert and L. Zsolnai, 155–163. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011c. Spiritual-Based Leadership. In Responsibility, Deep Ecology & The Self, eds. O. Jacobson and L. Pederson, 235–249. Oslo: Forlag 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Leadership Ethics and Caritas in Veritate. In The Moral Dynamics of Economic Life. An Extension and Critique of Caritas in Veritate, ed. D.K. Finn, 83–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Schumacher and the Principle of Responsibility in Economics. In Responsible Economics. E.F. Schumacher and his Legacy for the 21st Century, ed. H. Opdebeeck, 209–225. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, L., and L. Zsolnai, eds. 2007. Spirituality as a Public Good. Garant: Antwerp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L. 2012. The Wound and the Blessing Economics, Relationships and Happiness. New York: New City Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., and S. Zamagni. 2007. Civil Economy. Efficiency, Equity, Public Happiness. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoevel, C. 2009. Towards the Paradigm of Gift. Revista Cultura Economica 75/76: 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietaer, B. 2001. The Future of Money. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietaer, B., and J. Dunne. 2013. Rethinking Money. How New Currencies Turn Scarcity into Prosperity. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritain, J. 1936. Humanisme Intégral. Paris: Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounier, E. 1936. Manifeste au service du personnalisme. Paris: Montaigne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P., and K. Pruzan Mikkelsen. 2007. Leading with Wisdom Spiritual-based Leadership in Business. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E.F. 2004. A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. 1976. The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Allan Lane.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Reprint in 1976. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1776. The Wealth of Nations. Published in Penguin Books, 1970, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsolnai, L., and K. Ims. 2005. Business within Limits: Deep Ecology and Buddhist Economics. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luk Bouckaert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bouckaert, L. (2017). Teleological Reasoning in Economics. In: Rona, P., Zsolnai, L. (eds) Economics as a Moral Science. Virtues and Economics, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53291-2_4

Download citation