Skip to main content

Transdisciplinarity Governance and the Common Good

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economics as a Moral Science

Part of the book series: Virtues and Economics ((VIEC,volume 1))

  • 466 Accesses

Abstract

Humanity has entered into a stage of its evolution characterized by world unification in a number of domains – a stage which may be called the ‘era of globality’. Many issues become global in nature, and the question of the preservation of global common goods is challenging. In order to address current global issues, we need to change our way of thinking: the advent of the era of globality calls for complex and transdisciplinary approaches. It also requires new governance mechanisms to deal with the scale and complexity of global problems. The main argument of the chapter is that based on the principle of subsidiarity, multi-level governance mechanisms should be developed to preserve global common goods. Water provides a relevant illustration of the need for developing such mechanisms. A multi-level, transdisciplinary model is proposed for the governance of water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Both in the Aristotelian sense and in the sense of the contemporary pragmatic philosophical stream.

  2. 2.

    Physicists would not deny this affirmation: the matter that forms our bodies contains in variable (and sometimes infinitesimal) proportions, all the elements present on Earth.

  3. 3.

    Our translation.

  4. 4.

    Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds.

References

  • Alford, H., and M. Naughton. 2001. Managing as if Faith Mattered. Christian Social Principles in the Modern Organization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, H., and Y. Shcherbinina. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility and Common Good. In Business, Globalization and the Common Good, ed. H.-C. de Bettignies and F. Lépineux, 63–82. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 2013. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Lenox: Hard Press Publishing. First edition 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A. 1998. The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9–10): 1093–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2003. The Nichomachean Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. 2010. Mémoires. Paris: Robert Laffont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., and M. Flinders, ed. 2010. Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M. 2009. Vers un pacte de l’eau. Montreal: Editions Ecosociété.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M., and T. Clarke. 2003. Blue Gold, the Battle Against Corporate Theft of the World’s Water. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaud, M. 2000. Le basculement du monde. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2000. Who is Afraid of a European Federation? How to Constitutionalize a Multi-level Governance System. In What Kind of Constitution for What Kind of Polity? ed. C. Joerges, Y. Mény, and J.H.H. Weiler. San Domenico: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, L., and L. Zsolnai, ed. 2012. The Palgrave Handbook of Spirituality and Business. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 2000. Les structures sociales de l’économie. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillé, A. 1989. Critique de la raison utilitaire. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2005. The Information Age – Economy, Society and Culture. 3 volumes. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Châtelet, F. 1992. Une histoire de la raison. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergerie, J.-L. 1997. Le principe de subsidiarité. Paris: Ellipses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., D. Matten, and J. Moon. 2008. Corporations and Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, B.C., and J.M. Bryson. 2005. Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bettignies, H.-C., and F. Lépineux. 2009a. Business and the Global Common Good: An Interdisciplinary Approach. In Business, Globalization and the Common Good, ed. H.-C. de Bettignies and F. Lépineux, 27–61. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bettignies, H.-C., and F. Lépineux. 2009b. Can Multinational Corporations Afford to Ignore the Global Common Good? Business and Society Review 114 (2): 153–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rosnay, J. 1995. Le macroscope – Vers une vision globale. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, R.B., and L.S. Rouner. 1986. Corporations and the Common Good. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Onorio, J.-B., ed. 1995. La subsidiarité – De la théorie à la pratique. Paris: Téqui.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1989. The Cement of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Explaining Social Behavior. More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrass, J., and A. Jordan. 2010. Multilevel Governance and Environmental Policy. In Multi-level Governance, ed. I. Bache and M. Flinders, 147–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. 1988. Passions within Reason. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M.A., and J.A. Nelson, eds. 1993. Beyond Economic Man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontier Economics/HSBC. (2012). Exploring the Links Between Water and Economic Growth. Report commissioned by HSBC and produced by Frontier Economics, London. http://water.issuelab.org/resource/exploring_the_links_between_water_and_economic_growth.

  • Gatard, C. 2014. Mythologies du futur. Paris: L’archipel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin, T. 1988. Les métamorphoses du futur. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giust-Desprairies, F., A. Lévy, and A. Nicolaï (eds.). 1997. La résistible emprise de la rationalité instrumentale. Revue Internationale de Psychosociologie IV(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Committee for the Water Contract. 1998. Water Manifesto, www.gdrc.org/uem/water/WATER_MANIFESTO.doc.

  • Hardin, G. 1996. The tragedy of the commons. In Business and Society, ed. B. Castro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2001. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Multitude – War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review 97 (02): 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, I., I. Grunberg, and M. Stern, ed. 1999. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, I., P. Conceiҫao, K. Le Goulven, and R.U. Mendoza, ed. 2003. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. 2003. Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J.T. 2004. Prospects for Transdisciplinarity. Futures 36 (4): 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, P. 2006. The Common Good of the Firm as the Fiduciary Duty of the Manager. In Global Perspectives on Ethics of Corporate Governance, ed. G.J. Roussouw and A.J.G. Sison, 67–76. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latouche, S. 2001. La déraison de la raison économique. Du délire d’efficacité au principe de précaution. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. L’âge des limites. Paris: Mille et une nuits.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. 2000. Gaia – A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Revenge of GAIA – Earth’s Climate Crisis and the Fate of Humanity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J.J. 1990. On the Relation of Altruism and Self-Interest. In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. J.J. Mansbridge, 133–143. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. 2006. The myth of rationality. In Interdisciplinary Yearbook of Business Ethics, ed. L. Zsolnai, 17–29. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maréchal, J.-P. 1997. Le rationnel et le raisonnable. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., L. Hooghe, and K. Blank. 1996. European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric V. Multi-Level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (3): 341–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M.A. 2005. Foundations of Transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53 (1): 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., and Q. Fiore. 1989. War and Peace in the Global Village. New York: Touchstone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., and B. Powers. 1992. The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. 2009. Integrating Personalism into Virtue-Based Business Ethics: The Personalist and the Common Good Principles. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1): 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. 1990. Science Avec Conscience. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. From the Concept of System to the Paradigm of Complexity. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 15 (4): 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. La méthode. 6 volumes. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. On Complexity, Advances in Systems Theory, Complexity, and the Human Sciences. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E., and J.-L. Le Moigne. 1999. L’intelligence de la complexité. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2007. Intelligence de la complexité. Épistémologie et pratique. Colloque de Cerisy: Editions de l’Aube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J.A. 2006. Economics for Humans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, B. 2002. Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, T. 2009. Reconsidering the Common Good in a Business Context. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1): 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., and A.G. Scherer. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility, Democracy and the Politization of the Corporation. Academy of Management Review 33 (3): 773–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrella, R. 2001. The Water Manifesto. Arguments for a World Water Contract. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Le manifeste de l’eau pour le XXI esiècle. Pour un pacte social de l’eau. Montreal: Editions Fides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1983. La grande transformation. Aux origines politiques et économiques de notre temps. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadier, T. 2004. Transdisciplinarity and Its Challenges: The Case of Urban Studies. Futures 36 (4): 423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. 2001. The Age of Access – The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Where All of Life Is a Paid-for Experience. New York: Jeremy Tarcher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, J. 1989. Changer d’ère. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosé, J.-J., and F. Lépineux. 2013. From the Financial Crisis to Wise Management: The Relevance of the ‘Return to Aristotle’. In Wise Management in Organizational Complexity, ed. M. Thompson and D. Bevan, 68–84. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagawa, S., and E. Segal. 1999. Common Interest, Common Good: Creating Value Through Business and Social Sector Partnerships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savall, H., and V. Zardet. 2011. The Qualimetrics Approach. Observing the Complex Object: Information Age Publishing, Charlotte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A.G., G. Palazzo, and D. Matten. 2014. The Business Firm as a Political Actor: A New Theory of the Firm for a Globalized World. Business & Society 53 (2): 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooyans, M. 1991. La dérive totalitaire du libéralisme. Paris: Editions Universitaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. 2008. Global Corporate Citizenship. Foreign Affairs 60 : 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Satisficing. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell, P. Newman, and M. Milgate, 243–245. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A.J.G., and J. Fontrodona. 2011. The Common Good of Business: Addressing a Challenge Posed by «Caritas in Veritate». Journal of Business Ethics 100 (1): 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., and R. Schmidpeter. 2003. SMEs, Social Capital and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1–2): 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1985. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill, G., and J.-P. Ezin, ed. 2002. L’eau, patrimoine mondial commun. Co-expertise scientifique et participative et gouvernance. Namur: Presses universitaires de Namur.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2016. Sustainable Development Goals. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.

  • Velasquez, M. 1992. International Business, Morality, and the Common Good. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (1): 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. 1993. De l’antique sagesse de l’Italie. Paris: Flammarion. First edition 1710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. 2013. General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller, New York. First edition 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: an Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Water Council. 2016. http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/.

  • Zsolnai, L. 2008. Responsible Decision Making. London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Lépineux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lépineux, F., Rosé, JJ. (2017). Transdisciplinarity Governance and the Common Good. In: Rona, P., Zsolnai, L. (eds) Economics as a Moral Science. Virtues and Economics, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53291-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics