Advertisement

The Happiness Scale Interval Study

  • Tineke de Jonge
  • Ruut Veenhoven
  • Wim Kalmijn
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 68)

Abstract

The Happiness Scale Interval Study, is designed to be used for survey questions on happiness using verbal response options. It is used to determine what degrees of happiness are denoted by such terms when used in particular questions and different languages. The method uses a web-based Scale Interval Recorder. First a description is given of this Scale Interval Recorder. Next, the differences with conventional scale transformation methods are discussed. This is followed by an exemplar application of the conventional methods and the Scale Interval Method to existing survey data. The results of these applications are mutually compared from the perspective of the comparability problem.

References

  1. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. European Commission. (2012a). Brussels. European Opinion Research Group (EORG). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. Eurobarometer 57.1 (Mar–May 2002), ZA3639 Data file Version 1.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.10949; Eurobarometer 58.1 (Oct–Nov 2002), ZA3693 Data file Version 1.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.10953; Eurobarometer 60.1 (Oct–Nov 2003), ZA3938 Data file Version 1.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.10958; Eurobarometer 62.0 (Oct–Nov 2004), ZA4229 Data file Version 1.1.0. doi:10.4232/1.10962.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2012b). Brussels. TNS opinion & social [producer]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. Eurobarometer 63.4 (May–Jun 2005), ZA4411 Data file Version 1.1.0. doi:10.4232/1.10968; Eurobarometer 64.2 (Oct–Nov 2005), ZA4414 Data file Version 1.1.0. doi:10.4232/1.10970; Eurobarometer 65.2 (Mar–May 2006), ZA4506 Data file Version 1.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.10974; Eurobarometer 66.1 (Sep–Oct 2006), ZA4526 Data file Version 1.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.10980; Eurobarometer 66.3 (Nov–Dec 2006), ZA4528 Data file Version 2.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.10982; Eurobarometer 67.2 (Apr–May 2007), ZA4530 Data file Version 2.1.0. doi:10.4232/1.10984; Eurobarometer 68.1 (Sep–Nov 2007), ZA4565 Data file Version 4.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.10988; Eurobarometer 70.1 (Oct–Nov 2008), ZA4819 Data file Version 3.0.2. doi:10.4232/1.10989; Eurobarometer 71.2 (May–Jun 2009), ZA4972 Data file Version 3.0.2. doi:10.4232/1.10990; Eurobarometer 72.4 (Oct–Nov 2009), ZA4994 Data file Version 3.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11141; Eurobarometer 73.4 (May 2010), ZA5234 Data file Version 2.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.11479; Eurobarometer 76.3 (2011), ZA5567 Data file Version 1.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11448.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2013–2015). Brussels. TNS opinion & social [producer]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. Eurobarometer 69.2 (Mar–May 2008), ZA4744 Data file Version 5.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11755; Eurobarometer 71.1 (Jan–Feb 2009), ZA4971 Data file Version 4.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11756; Eurobarometer 74.2 (2010), ZA5449 Data file Version 2.2.0. doi:10.4232/1.11626; Eurobarometer 75.3 (2011), ZA5481 Data file Version 2.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11768; Eurobarometer 75.4 (2011), ZA5564 Data file Version 3.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11769; Eurobarometer 77.3 (2012), ZA5612 Data file Version 1.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11558; Eurobarometer 77.4 (2012), ZA5613 Data file Version 2.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11697; Eurobarometer 78.1 (2012), ZA5685 Data file Version 1.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11706 Eurobarometer 79.3 (2013), ZA5689 Data file Version 1.1.0. doi:10.4232/1.12445; Eurobarometer 80.1 (2013), ZA5876 Data file Version 1.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11881; Eurobarometer 81.2 (2014), ZA5913 Data file Version 1.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.12172; Eurobarometer 81.4 (2014), ZA5928 Data file Version 2.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.12201; Eurobarometer 82.3 (2014), ZA5932 Data file Version 2.0.1. doi:10.4232/1.12259; Eurobarometer 83.1 (2015), ZA5964 Data file Version 1.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.12340; Eurobarometer 83.3 (2015), ZA5998 Data file Version 1.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.12356.Google Scholar
  5. Exton, C., Smith, C., & Vandendriessche, D. (2015). Comparing happiness across countries: Does culture matter? (OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2015/04). OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: 10.1787/18152031. Retrieved February 15, 2016, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/comparing-happiness-across-the-world_5jrqppzd9bs2-en?crawler=true
  6. Hazelrigg, L. E., & Hardy, M. A. (2000). Scaling the semantics of satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 49(2), 147–180. doi: 10.1023/A:1006937713249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalmijn, W.M. (2010). Quantification of happiness inequality. Dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Enschede: Ipskamp Drukkers. Available at http://repub.eur.nl/pub/21777
  8. Kalmijn, W. M., Arends, L. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2011). Happiness scale interval study, methodological considerations. Social Indicators Research, 102(3), 497–515. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9688-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research (Wiley series in survey methodology). New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-470-11495-7, e-ISBN 978-0-470-16519-5.Google Scholar
  10. Scherpenzeel, A. (1999). Why use 11-point scales? Documentation of the Swiss Household Panel. http://forscenter.ch-en-our-surveys-swiss-household-panel-documentationfaq-methods-varia-. Accessed May 2014.Google Scholar
  11. Schmitt, H., Scholz, E., Leim, I., & Moschner, M. (2008). The Mannheim eurobarometer trend file 1970–2002 (ed. 2.00). European Commission [Principal investigator]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3521 Data file Version 2.0.1. doi: 10.4232/1.10074.Google Scholar
  12. Studer, R. (2011). Does it matter how happiness is measured? Evidence from a randomized controlled experiment. Working paper series/Department of Economics 49, University of Zurich. Retrieved February 15, 2016, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1963817
  13. Valentine, N., Verdes-Tennant, & Bonsel, G. (2015). Health systems’ responsiveness and reporting behaviour: Multilevel analysis of the influence of individual-level factors in 64 countries. Social Science & Medicine, 138, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Veenhoven, R., & Hermus, P. (2006). Scale interval recorder. Tool for assessing relative weights of verbal response options on survey questions, web survey program. The Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam, Department of Social Sciences & Risbo Contract Research. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/images/demo_intervalrecorder.gif
  15. Veenhoven, R. (2008). The international scale interval study. In V. Møller & D. Huschka (Eds.), Quality of Life in the new millennium: ;Advances in quality-of-life studies, theory and research’, Part 2: Refining concepts and measurement to assess cross-cultural quality-of-life, Social Indicator Research Series (Vol. 35, pp. 45–58). Dordrecht: Springer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tineke de Jonge
    • 1
  • Ruut Veenhoven
    • 1
  • Wim Kalmijn
    • 1
  1. 1.Erasmus Happiness Economics Research OrganisationErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations