Advertisement

Combining and Pooling of Time Series on Life Satisfaction in the USA, Japan, The Netherlands and Spain

  • Tineke de Jonge
  • Ruut Veenhoven
  • Wim Kalmijn
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 68)

Abstract

We applied the Reference Distribution Method to pool time series on life satisfaction in the USA, Japan, The Netherlands and Spain, using results from the World Values Survey to derive reference distributions from. This resulted in consistent time series spanning almost 60 years for Japan, 40 years for The Netherlands and 35 years for the USA and Spain. Life satisfaction in Japan and The Netherlands was almost equal in the eighties, but at present differs more than one point in favor of The Netherlands. Life satisfaction in Spain reached its lowest value of 6.0 in 2012, but has increased since then to 6.3 in 2015.

Keywords

Time Series Life Satisfaction Beta Distribution Survey Item Mode Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Davis, R. E., Couper, M. P., Janz, N. K., Caldwell, C. H., & Resnicow, K. (2010). Interviewer effects in public health surveys. Health Education Research, 25(1), 14–26., Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093-her-cyp046Google Scholar
  2. Deaton, A. (2012). The financial crisis and the well-being of Americans. Oxford Economic Papers, 64(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deaton, A. & Stone, A. A. (2016). Understanding context effects for a measure of life evaluation: How responses matter. Oxford Economic Papers, 1–10, doi: 10.1093/oep/gpw022Google Scholar
  4. DeJonge, T., Veenhoven, R., Kalmijn, W. M., & Arends, L. R. (2015). Stability of boundaries between response options of response scales. Does ‘very happy’ remain equally happy over the years? Social Indicators Research, 123(1), 241–266. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0735-2Google Scholar
  5. DeJonge, T., Veenhoven, R., Kalmijn, W. M., & Arends, L. R. (2016). Pooling time series based on slightly different questions about the same topic. Forty years of survey research on happiness and life satisfaction in The Netherlands. Social Indicators Research, 126, 863–891. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0898-5
  6. Dolan, P. & Kavetsos, G. (2012). Happy Talk: Mode of Administration Effects on Subjective Well-Being. CEP Discussion Paper, No. 1159. London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved May 2014, from http:cep.lse.ac.uk-pubs-download-dp1159.pdf
  7. Howard, G. S., Ralph, K. M., Gulanick, N. A., Maxwell, S. E., Nance, D. W., & Gerber, S. K. (1979). Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests, Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(1), 1–23. doi:10.1177-014662167900300101Google Scholar
  8. Katz, D. (1942). Do interviewers bias poll results. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 6(2), 248–268. Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. http:www.jstor.org-stable-2745023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. OECD (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. OECD Publishing.  http:dx.doi.org-10.1787-9789264191655-en
  10. Pudney, S. (2010). An experimental analysis of the impact of survey design on measures and models of subjective wellbeing. ISER Working Paper Series, 2010–20. Economic & Social Research Council. Retrieved February 3, 2016, from www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2010-20.pdf
  11. Schwartz, C. E., & Sudman, S. (Eds.). (1992). Context effects in social and psychological research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Schwartz, C.E., Ahmed, S., Sawatzky, R., Sajobi, T., Mayo, M., Finkelstein, J., Lix, L., Verdam, M.G.E., Oort, F.J., & Sprangers, M.A.G. (2013). Guidelines for secondary analysis in search of response shift. Quality of Life Research, 22, 2663–2673. doi:10.1007-s11136-013-0402-0
  13. Senik, C. (2013). The French Unhappiness Puzzle: the Cultural Dimension of Happiness. Université Paris-Sorbonne and Paris School of Economics. http:www.parisschoolofeconomics.eu-docs-senik-claudia-new_version_french_october25_2013.pdf
  14. Stone, A. A., & Mackie, C. (Eds.). (2013). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. Panel on measuring subjective well-being in a policy-relevant framework . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.National Research Council, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and EducationGoogle Scholar
  15. Studer, R. & Winkelmann, R. (2014). Reported happiness, fast and slow. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 1055–1067. doi:10.1007-s11205-013-0376-xGoogle Scholar
  16. van Beuningen, J., van der Houwen, K., & Moonen, L. (2014). Measuring well-being, An analysis of different response scales. Discussion Paper, Statistics Netherlands. Retrieved July 20, 2015, from http:www.cbs.nl-NR-rdonlyres-FF644A99-580C-4D7E-B214-BEE54A947D46-0-Measuringwellbeing.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tineke de Jonge
    • 1
  • Ruut Veenhoven
    • 1
  • Wim Kalmijn
    • 1
  1. 1.Erasmus Happiness Economics Research OrganisationErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations