Integrated History and Philosophy of Science pp 109-125

Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook book series (VCIY, volume 20) | Cite as

Extended Evolution and the History of Knowledge

Chapter

Abstract

This paper provides a framework for analyzing the history of knowledge from the perspective of extended evolution, a conceptual framework that analyzes evolutionary processes as transformations of extended regulatory network structures and is designed to apply to a whole range of phenomena, from genome and biological to cultural and technological evolution. Regulatory networks, such as gene regulatory networks or institutions, control the behavior of individual elements within systems, whether these are genes within cells or organisms or individuals within societies. All of these phenomena can be seen as a form of extended evolution. Our framework is inspired by Ernst Mach, a scientist turned historian and philosopher who developed a distinctly evolutionary conception of knowledge. For Mach the dynamics of highly structured systems of knowledge, such as science, was a logical outgrowth of the evolutionary roots of human cognition. He focused specifically on the role of memory—information from genomes to cultural traditions in present-day terminology—and emphasized how all life forms extract “knowledge” or information through a continuous process of trial and error. As a consequence of these processes of knowledge acquisition, tested “hypotheses” are incorporated into the (genetic or cultural) make-up or memory of each species. Indeed, Mach’s ideas about the cultural transmission of shared or collective memories and the role of institutions in that process are an early version of what we call cultural evolution today (Mach 2011).

References

  1. Bowles, Samuel, and Herbert Gintis. 2011. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Damerow, Peter. 1996. Abstraction and Representation: Essays on the Cultural Evolution of Thinking, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 175. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2000. How Can Discontinuities in Evolution Be Conceptualized? Cultural Psychology 6 (2): 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2012. The Origins of Writing and Arithmetic. In The Globalization of Knowledge in History, Studies 1: Max Planck Research Library in the History and Development of Knowledge, ed. Jürgen Renn, 153–173. Berlin: Edition Open Access.Google Scholar
  5. Dediu, Dan, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2013. On the Antiquity of Language: The Reinterpretation of Neandertal Linguistic Capacities and Its Consequences. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond, Jared M. 1998. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Fuller, Dorian Q., Robin G. Allaby, and Chris Stevens. 2010. Domestication as Innovation: The Entanglement of Techniques, Technology and Change in the Domestication of Cereal Crops. World Archaeology 42 (1): 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuller, Dorian Q., George Wilcox, and Robin G. Allaby. 2011. Cultivation and Domestication Had Multiple Origins: Arguments against the Core Area Hypothesis for the Origins of Agriculture in the Near East. World Archaeology 43 (4): 628–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hölldobler, Bert, and Edward O. Wilson. 2009. The Leafcutter Ants: Civilization by Instinct. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Jeffares, Ben. 2012. Thinking Tools: Acquired Skills, Cultural Niche Construction, and Thinking with Things. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4): 228–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laland, Kevin N., et al. 2000. Niche Construction, Biological Evolution, and Cultural Change. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1): 131–146; see also the discussion on pp. 146–175.Google Scholar
  12. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J. and Gilbert, S. F. (2008), EvoDevo and niche construction: building bridges. J. Exp. Zool., 310B: 549–566. doi:10.1002/jez.b.21232.
  13. Laubichler, Manfred, and Jürgen Renn. 2015. Extended evolution: A conceptual framework for integrating regulatory networks and niche construction. JEZ Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 324 (7): 565–577.Google Scholar
  14. Levinson, Stephen C. and Judith Holler. 2014. The Origin of Human Multimodal Communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369: 20130302. Google Scholar
  15. Lock, Andrew J. 2000. Phylogenetic Time and Symbol Creation: Where Do Zopeds Come from? Culture & Psychology 6 (2): 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mace, Ruth, and Clare J. Holden. 2005. A Phylogenetic Approach to Cultural Evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20 (3): 116–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mach, Ernst. 1986. Popular Scientific Lectures. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2011. Erkenntnis und Irrtum. In Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung. Ernst Mach Studienausgabe. Berlin: Xenomoi Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Maynard Smith, John, and Eörs Szathmáry. 1995. The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. McNeill, William. 1976. Plagues and Peoples. New York: Anchor Books Doubleday.Google Scholar
  21. Mesoudi, Alex, et al. 2004. Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of the Origin of Species. Evolution 58 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2011. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Odling-Smee, John. 1995. Niche Construction, Genetic Evolution and Cultural Change. Behavioural Processes 35 (1–3): 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Page, Robert E. 2013. The Spirit of the Hive: The Mechanisms of Social Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Read, Dwight W. 2014. The Substance of Cultural Evolution: Culturally Framed Systems of Social Organization. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3): 270–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Renn, Jürgen, ed. 2012. The Globalization of Knowledge in History, Studies 1: Max Planck Research Library in the History and Development of Knowledge. Berlin: Edition Open Access.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2014. The Globalization of Knowledge in History and its Normative Challenges. Rechtsgeschichte/Legal History 22: 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 2015a. From the History of Science to the History of Knowledge – and Back. Centaurus 57: 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2015b. Learning from Kushim about the Origin of Writing and Farming. In Grain Vapor Ray. Textures of the Anthropocene, ed. K. Klingan, A. Sepahvand, C. Rosol, and B.M. Scherer, 241–259. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Richerson, Peter J., and Morten H. Christiansen. 2013. Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion, Strungmann Forum Reports. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, Leslie, Julie Dockrell, and Peter Tomlinson. 1997. Piaget, Vygotsky and Beyond: Future Issues for Developmental Psychology and Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Tomasello, Michael. 2014. A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society. In The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wimsatt, W.C. 2013. Articulating Babel: An Approach to Cultural Evolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4): 563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations