Skip to main content

The First Century of Cell Theory: From Structural Units to Complex Living Systems

A Look from 1940 at 100 Years of Cell-Theory

Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook book series (VCIY,volume 20)

Abstract

In his introduction to the volume entitled The Cell and Protoplasm in 1940, the editor Forest Ray Moulton noted that the American Association for the Advancement of Science was publishing the volume as the product of a symposium, held in 1939, to celebrate the centennial of Matthias Schleiden and Theodor Schwann’s 1838 cell theory. Because of the rich history of thinking about cells up to that time, “In a sense the Cell Theory is not new.” Yet, Moulton suggested, “In another sense the Cell Theory is always new, for every discovery respecting this primary and essential unit of living organisms, both plant and animal, has raised more questions than it has answered and has always widened the fields of inquiry.” The volume set out to show both what was already well-established and what was new.

Keywords

  • Nineteenth Century
  • Living Organism
  • Sperm Cell
  • Cell Theory
  • Epistemological Assumption

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53258-5_4
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-53258-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    Schleiden (1838); Schwann (1839).

  2. 2.

    Forest Ray Moulton (1940), Foreword.

  3. 3.

    Sharp (1943), p. 21.

  4. 4.

    Harris (1999). Chapters 1 and 2 on early microscopists and early theories.

  5. 5.

    Baker (1948), page 103.

  6. 6.

    Raspail (1833), Quoted in Harris (1999), p. 32.

  7. 7.

    Harris (1999), p. 96.

  8. 8.

    Harris (1999), p. 98. Translated from Schleiden (1838).

  9. 9.

    von Baer (1827).

  10. 10.

    Newport (1851/1853/1854).

  11. 11.

    For discussion of this point, see for example: Churchill (1970).

  12. 12.

    Wilson (1895).

  13. 13.

    Robert (1855).

  14. 14.

    Harris (1999), p. 132.

  15. 15.

    Virchow (1858). Translated as: Cellular pathology, London: John Churchill, 1859.

  16. 16.

    Hertwig (1893/1898).

  17. 17.

    Wilson (1896), page 1.

  18. 18.

    Wilson (1925), page 1.

  19. 19.

    Wilson (1925), p. 1118.

  20. 20.

    For an excellent discussion of Boveri’s work, see: Laubichler and Davidson (2008).

  21. 21.

    Hamburger (1988).

  22. 22.

    Morgan (1901).

  23. 23.

    Baker (1948), p. 175. Sedgwick (1894).

  24. 24.

    For more discussion of this and related topics, see Maienschein (2014).

References

  • Baker, John Randal. 1948. The Cell-Theory: A Restatement, History, and Critique. Part I. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 80: 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Frederick B. 1970. Hertwig, Weismann, and the Meaning of Reduction Division Circa 1890. Isis; An International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 61: 429–457.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, Viktor. 1988. The Heritage of Experimental Embryology: Hans Spemann and the Organizer. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Henry. 1999. The Birth of the Cell. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, Oscar. 1893. Die zelle und die gewebe. Grundzüge der allgemeinen anatomic und physiologie. Volume 1 (1893), volume 2 (1898). Jena: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, Manfred D., and Eric H. Davidson. 2008. Boveri’s Long Experiment: Sea Urchin Merogones and the Establishment of the Role of Nuclear Chromosomees in Development. Developmental Biology 314: 1–11.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, Jane. 2014. Embryos Under the Microscope. Diverging Meanings of Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1901. Regeneration. New York: Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, Forest Ray, ed. 1940. The Cell and Protoplasm. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, The Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, George. On the Impregnation of the Ovum in the Amphibia. Philosophical Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 3 Series: (1851) 141: 169–290; (1853) 143: 233–290; (1854) 144: 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raspail, Françoise-Vincent. 1833. Nouveau système de chimie organique, fondé sure des methods nouvelles d’observation. Paris: Ballière.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, Remak. 1855. Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der Wirbeltiere. Berlin: G. Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiden, Matthias. 1838. Beiträge zur Phytogenesis. Müller’s Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin: 137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwann, Theodor. 1839. Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Übereinstimmung in der Struktur und dem Wachsthum der Thiere und Pflanzen. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Adam. 1894. On the Inadequacy of the Cellular Theory of Development. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 37: 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Lester W. 1943. Fundamentals of Cytology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virchow, Rudolf. 1858. Die Cellularpathologie in ihrer begründung auf physiologische und pathologische gewebelehre. Berlin: A. Hirschwald.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Baer, Karl Ernst. 1827. De Ovi Mammalium et Homini Genesi. Lipsiae: Leopoldi Vossii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edmund Beecher. 1895. An Atlas of the Fertilization and Karyokinesis of the Ovum. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1896. The Cell in Development and Inheritance. New York: Macmillan and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1925. The Cell in Development and Heredity. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the &HPS organizing committee and to Friedrich Stadler to present this paper in 2014 in Vienna. And thanks to the National Science Foundation for support through a series of grants funding background research. I also appreciate my collaborators Manfred Laubichler, William Aird , and Karl Matlin for working together on understanding the history of cell biology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Maienschein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maienschein, J. (2017). The First Century of Cell Theory: From Structural Units to Complex Living Systems. In: Stadler, F. (eds) Integrated History and Philosophy of Science. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53258-5_4

Download citation