Abstract
In the past century, the prevailing view has been that the main problem of epistemology, or theory of knowledge, is to give a definition of knowledge, and the prevailing definition of knowledge has been that knowledge is justified true belief. This contrasts with the fact that, since antiquity, the definition of knowledge as justified true belief has been known to be subject to counterexamples, and all the variants of this definition that have been put forward are also subject to counterexamples. As an alternative, this chapter argues that the main problem of epistemology is to explain what role knowledge plays in human life. Specifically, unlike justified true belief, knowledge in not merely a state of mind, but rather a response to the environment that is essential for survival. This involves a naturalistic approach to knowledge, according to which knowledge is a natural process, continuous with the biological processes by which life is sustained and evolved, and has a vital role, in the literal sense that life exists only insofar as there is knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bacon, Francis. 1961–1986. Works. Stuttgart Bad Cannstatt: Frommann Holzboog.
Cellucci, Carlo. 1998. Le ragioni della logica. Rome: Laterza.
———. 2013a. Rethinking logic: Logic in relation to mathematics, evolution, and method. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chisholm, Roderick. 1989. Theory of knowledge. London: Prentice-Hall.
Descartes, René. 1996. Oeuvres. Paris: Vrin.
Dewey, John. 1911. Brief studies in realism. I. The Journal of Philosophy. Psychology and Scientific Method 8 : 393–400.
———. 1938. Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
———. 2004. Reconstruction in philosophy. Mineola: Dover.
Etcoff, Nancy. 1999. Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York: Anchor.
Frege, Gottlob. 2013. Basic laws of arithmetic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gettier, Edmund L. 1963. Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis 23 : 121–123.
Heidegger, Martin. 1998. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mach, Ernst. 1976. Knowledge and error: Sketches on the psychology of enquiry. Dordrecht: Springer.
Meinong, Alexius. 1968–1978. Gesamtausgabe. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.
Nozick, Robert. 1997. Socratic puzzles. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pennings, Timothy. 2003. Do dogs know calculus? The College Mathematics Journal 34 : 178–182.
Pinker, Steven. 1995. The language instinct. New York: Harper-Collins.
Plantinga, Alvin. 2011. Where the conflict really lies: Science, religion, and naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poincaré, Henri. 2013. The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis – The value of science – Science and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1972. Objective knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2000. Realism and the aim of science. London: Routledge.
———. 1985. Evolutionary epistemology. In Open questions in quantum physics, ed. Gino Tarozzi and Alwyn van der Merwe, 395–413. Dordrecht: Springer.
Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1981b. Theories and things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Russell, Bertrand. 1988. Theory of knowledge. In Bertrand Russell, Collected papers, vol. 9, 194–202. London: Routledge.
———. 1992a. Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. London: Routledge.
Shaffer, Dennis, Scott Krauchunas, Marianna Eddy, and Michael McBeath. 2004. How dogs navigate to catch frisbees. Psychological Science 15 : 437–441.
Tichý, Pavel. 1974. On Popper’s definitions of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 : 155–160.
Williams, Michael. 2001. Problems of knowledge: A critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2004. Is knowledge a natural phenomenon? In The externalist challenge, ed. Richard Schantz, 193–209. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cellucci, C. (2017). Knowledge and Naturalism. In: Rethinking Knowledge. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53237-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53237-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53236-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53237-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)