Skip to main content

The Heuristic View

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: European Studies in Philosophy of Science ((ESPS,volume 4))

Abstract

As a response to the increasing irrelevance of philosophy, this chapter lists the characteristics philosophy should have in order to be fruitful. This results in a view of philosophy that may be called the heuristic view, according to which philosophy aims at knowledge and methods to acquire knowledge. In listing the characteristics philosophy should have according to the heuristic view, the chapter systematically compares them with those of classical analytic philosophy. This is motivated by the fact that, in the past century, classical analytic philosophy has been the prevailing philosophical tradition. The characteristics of philosophy listed in the chapter are not intended to suggest that philosophies without such characteristics are bad, but only that they cannot be expected to be legitimized in the face of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atiyah, Michael. 2005. Joint interview with Isadore Singer, by Martin Raussen and Christian Skau. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 52: 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, John Langshaw. 1970. Philosophical papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, George. 1996. On the possibility of philosophical knowledge. Philosophical Perspectives 10: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carl, Wolfgang. 1994. Frege’s theory of sense and reference: Its origin and scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. 2003. The logical structure of the world – Pseudoproblems in philosophy. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci, Carlo. 1995. Frege e le origini della logica matematica. Introduction to Gottlob Frege, Leggi fondamentali dell’aritmetica.ix-lxvi Rome: Teknos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. Rethinking logic: Logic in relation to mathematics, evolution, and method. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 1996. Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meaning of life. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of language. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The logical basis of metaphysics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The place of philosophy in European culture. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The nature and future of philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert. 1954. A testimonial. In Jacques Hadamard, The psychology of invention in the mathematical field, 142–143. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry. 2004. Water’s water everywhere. London Review of Books 26(20): 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob. 1960. The foundations of arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, Hans-Johann. 2008. What is analytic philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, Jacques. 1954. The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, Stephen. 1988. A brief history of time: From the big bang to black holes. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl Gustav. 1966. Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Theoretical philosophy after 1781. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Anthropology, history, and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Epistemology without history is blind. Erkenntnis 75: 505–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas Samuel. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George Edward. 1942. An Autobiography. In The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, ed. Paul Arthur Schilpp, 3–39. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosconi, Jean. 2014. The development of the concept of machine computability from 1936 to the 1960s. In Constructivity and computability in historical and philosophical perspective, ed. Jacques Dubucs and Michel Bourdeau, 37–56. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas. 1987. What does it all mean? A very short introduction to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri. 1910. Savants et écrivains. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas. 1993. American philosophy today. The Review of Metaphysics 46: 717–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, Alan J. 2011. Image and reality: Kekulé, Kopp, and the scientific imagination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rota, Gian-Carlo. 1997. Indiscrete thoughts. Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1950. Unpopular essays. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1960. Introduction. In Ernest Gellner, Words and things, 13–15. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995a. An outline of philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995b. My philosophical development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The problems of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santayana, George. 1948. The life of reason: Reason in common sense. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John Rogers. 2008. Philosophy in a new century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1932–1933. Muss sich denn nicht... . In Wittgenstein’s Nachlass, TS 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1958. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969a. The blue and brown books. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969b. On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. Philosophical grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. Philosophical remarks. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Notebooks 1914–1916. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Culture and value: A selection from the posthumous remains. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The big typescript TS 213. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cellucci, C. (2017). The Heuristic View. In: Rethinking Knowledge. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53237-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics