Advertisement

Exploring the Concept and Practices of Felicitas Publica at Lisbon University: A Community-Based Relational Approach to Well-being

Chapter
Part of the Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being book series (CQLWB)

Abstract

This chapter explores a collaborative action-research project, whose aim was to generate new knowledge about well-being and happiness in higher education, which might result in improved outcomes for the school communities. The discussion draws upon data from a study conducted across 10 Schools of the biggest Portuguese University—Universidade de Lisboa. The views and perspectives of 109 participants (students, teachers, chancellors and staff) have been sought through Focus-Group interviews, using the World Café methodology to engage and connect participants in conversation, and Appreciative Inquiry to construct meaningful and transformative questions. The study had multiple aims: to generate a genuine, collaborative and positive dialogic environment; to promote a sense of community through relational goods; to co-create a novel consciousness on the past and future of the collective and relational happiness processes inside these communities; to investigate the topic, in contributing with action-research methods; and to provide a framework for the science and application of well-being at the university level. Conversations addressed how each school and domain of science enrolled (Law, Humanities, Medicine, Social and Political Sciences, Physical Exercise and Human Movement, Dental Medicine, Agronomy, Architecture, Design and Arts, and Biology), defined Public Happiness, how the school members consider that they are promoting Public Happiness in everyday life, and how it can be developed and put into practice in the near future inside and outside every school community. Five major themes emerged in the images and written accounts across all school cohorts, associated with well-being, specifically concerning (1) quality of relationships; (2) school identity; (3) presence of virtuousness of the individuals and the community; (4) the vocation to learn and teach; and (5) contributions to the common good. Proposals for the enhancement of well-being in higher education through a community-based approach are discussed, in particular since such findings highlight the potential of more relational, democratic, reciprocate, virtuous and participatory approaches, beyond and besides academic learning.

Keywords

Felicitas Publica Community well-being Appreciative inquiry Relational goods World Café Well-being University Action-research 

References

  1. Anderson, R. (1998). Intuitive inquiry: A transpersonal approach. In W. Braud & R. Anderson (Eds.), Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience (pp. 69–94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Azevedo, C. N., & Menezes, I. (2008). Transition to Democracy and Citizenship Education in Portugal: Changes and Continuities in the Curricula and in Adolescents’ Opportunities for Participation. Journal of Social Science Education, 9(1), 131–148.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2008). An agentic perspective on positive psychology. Retrieved from https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura2008PP.pdf
  4. Bates, F. L., & Bacon, L. (1972). The community as a social system. Social Forces, 50(3), 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biswas-Diener, R. (Ed.). (2011). Positive psychology as social change. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, J. L., Hutson, B. L., He, Y., & Konkle, E. (2013). Appreciative education. In P. C. Mather & E. Hulme (Eds.), Positive psychology and appreciative inquiry in higher education: new directions for student services (Vol. 143). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The world cafe: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. California: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  8. Bruni, L. (2012a). The genesis and ethos of the market. London: Macmillan Palvrage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruni, L. (2012b). The wound and the blessing. New York: Newcity.Google Scholar
  10. Bruni, L. (2013). Relational goods: A new tool for an old issue. Estudos Contemporâneos da Subjetividade—ECOS, Thematic Issue on Positive Psychology and Public Happiness, 3(2),173–178.Google Scholar
  11. Bruni, L. (2016). Economics, well-being and happiness: History and protagonists. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in happiness and quality of life (pp. 334–348). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2003). Economía civile and Pubblica Felicitá in the Italian enlightenment. History of Political Economy, 35, 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook on the economics of happiness. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2016). Happiness and Quality of Life Reconciled. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in happiness and quality of life (pp. 1–19). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3–4), 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruni, L., & Zamagni, S. (2007). Civil economy. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Bruni, L. & Zamagni, S. (2016). The challenges of public happiness: An historical-methodological reconstruction. World Happiness Report. Retrieved from http://worldhappiness.report/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/03/HR-V2Ch3_web.pdf.
  18. Buckingham, D. (2009). ‘Creatve’ visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture and Society, 31(4), 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Champeaux, J. (1987). Fortuna. Recherches sur le culte de la Fortune à Rome et dans le monde romain des origines à la mort de César. II Les Transformations de Fortuna sous le République (pp. 216–236). Rome: Ecole Française de Rome.Google Scholar
  20. Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2001). A positive revolution in change: Appreciative inquiry. In R. T. Golembiewsky (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior, Secon edition revised and expanded. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  21. Delle Fave, A. (2016). Subjective indicators of well-being. Conceptual background and applications in social sciences. In L. Bruni & P.L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in happiness and quality of life (pp. 71–89). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Deresiewicz, W. (2014). Excellent sheep: The miseducation of the American elite and the way to a meaningful life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & W. R. Melvin (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elias, N. (1974). Foreword: Towards a theory of communities. In C. Bell & H. Newby (Eds.), The Sociology of Community. London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Esposito, R. (2003). Comunitas: Origen y Destino de la Comunidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.Google Scholar
  27. Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Gui, B. (1987). Eléments pour une définition d’économie communautaire. Notes et Documents, 19, 32–42.Google Scholar
  29. Gui, B. (2005). From transactions to encounters: The joint generation of relational goods and conventional values. In B. Gui & R. Sugden (Eds.), Economics and social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gui, B., & Stanca, L. (2010). Happiness and relational goods: Well-being and interpersonal relations in the economic sphere. International Review of Economics, 57, 106–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (Eds.). (2005). Economics and social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Haworth, J., & Hart, G. (Eds.). (2007). Well-being: Individual, community and social perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., Grover, S., & Wang, S. (2014). Good governance and national well-being: What are the linkages? OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 25, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Huppert, F. A. (2013). The state of well-being science: Concepts, measures, interventions and policies. In F. A. Huppert & C. Cooper (Eds.), Interventions and policies to enhance well-being. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  36. Khumalo, I. P. (2014). I and Others. In M. Wissing, J. Potgieter, T. Guse, T. Khumalo, & L. Nel (Eds.), Towards flourishing: Contextualising positive psychology (pp. 199–206). Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
  37. Lomas, P. (2016). Positive psychology: Second wave. The Psychologist, 29, 536–539.Google Scholar
  38. Marujo, H. Á., & Neto, L. M. (Eds.). (2013). Positive nations and communities: Collective, qualitative and cultural-sensitive processes in positive psychology. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Marujo, H. Á., & Neto, L. M. (2014). Felicitas Publica and community well-being: nourishing relational goods through dialogic conversations between deprived and privileged populations. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 24(1), 161–181.Google Scholar
  40. Marujo, H. Á., & Neto, L. M. (2016). Quality of life studies and positive psychology. In L. Bruni & P. Porta (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications on happiness and quality of life (pp. 279–305). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. McCarthy, F. E., & Vickers, M. H. (2013). Positive community relations: Border crossing and repositioning the “other”. In S. Roffey (Ed.), Positive relationships: Evidence-based practices across the world (pp. 227–243). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Neto, L. M., & Marujo, H. A. (2013). Positive community psychology and positive community development: Research and intervention as transfomative-appreciative actions. In H. A. Marujo & L. M. Neto (Eds.), Positive nations and communities: Collective, qualitative and cultural sensitive processes in positive psychology (pp. 209–230). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Nussbaum, M. (2005). Mill between Aristotle and Bentham. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 170–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Oades, L. G., Robinson, P., Green, S., & Spence, G. B. (2011). Towards a positive university. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(6), 432–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD. (2015). How is life in Portugal? Report on the better life initiative country Portugal. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/portugal/Better%20Life%20Initiative%20country%20note%20Portugal.pdf
  46. Parks, A. C. (2011). The state of positive psychology in higher education: Introduction to the special issue. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(6), 429–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pelloni, A. (2016). Relational goods and happiness data. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in happiness and quality of life (pp. 448–466). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. New York: Oxford University Press/Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  50. Pinkney, E. (2016). University mental health policies: Better communication = better mental health. Retrieved from http://edwardpinkney.com/?p=323
  51. Prilleltensky, I. (2012). Wellness as fairness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1–2), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prilleltensky, I. (2013). Wellness without fairness: the missing link in psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 43(2), 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prilleltensky, I., & Prilleltensky, O. (2006). Promoting well-being: Linking personal, organizational, and community change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  56. Rojas, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2013). Contentment and affect in the appraisal of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rojas, M., Willis, E., Hansberg, O., Millán, R., & Abdallah, S. (2016). Understanding High happiness in Latin America. Retrieved from http://www.happinessandwell-being.org/rojas
  58. Saarinen, T., & Ursin, J. (2012). Dominant and emerging appracohes in the study of higher education change. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmitz, D. S. (2010). Developing an awareness of white privilege. Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping, 18(1), 15–20.Google Scholar
  60. Sen, A. (2016). Happiness and social institutions. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in happiness and quality of life (pp. 20–31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  61. Stanca, L. (2016). Happiness, relational goods and hedonic methodology. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in happiness and quality of life (pp. 483–498). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Tonon, G. (2013). Positive communities. Dimensions for assessment and intervention. In A. C. Solano (Ed.), Positive psychology in Latin America (pp. 233–240). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Viegas J. M. L. (2004). Tolerância e democracia: o caso português numa perspectiva comparativa Europeia. [Tolerance and democracy: the Portuguese case in a comparative European perspective]. In J. M. L. Viegas, A. C. Pinto, & S. Faria (Eds.). Democracia, Novos Desafios e Novos Horizontes. Oeiras: Celta Editora.Google Scholar
  64. Villaverde Cabral, M. (2007). Efeitos de classe e efeitos societais: Elites e operariado ante a cidadania política numa perspectiva comparada europeia. [Class effects and societal effects: elites and the working class in the presence of politic citizenship in a comparative european perspective]. In J. Vala & A. Torres (Org.), Contextos e atitudes sociais na Europa. Lisboa: ICS, 37–67.Google Scholar
  65. Vogt, E., Brown, J., & Issacs, D. (2003). The art of powerful questions: Catalyzing insight, innovation, and action. Mill Valley, CA: Whole Systems Associates.Google Scholar
  66. Warren, R. L. (1977). The community in America. Chicago: Rand-MacNally.Google Scholar
  67. WiHE (Well-being in Higher Education). (2016). Retrieved http://www.well-beinginhighereducation.com/
  68. Won, P. T. P., & Tomer, A. (2011). Beyond terror and denial: The positive psychology of death acceptance. Death Studies, 35(2), 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas—ISCSPCentro de Investigação e Políticas Públicas—CAPP. ISCSP Well-being—ISCSPLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Lisbon UniversityLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations