Abstract
In this chapter, we examine how a salient intergroup relationship can affect individual donation decisions. We discuss findings and theoretical considerations under four pertinent categories: (1) group memberships and donor familiarity; (2) the donor–perpetrator relationship; (3) the donor–victim relationship; and (4) intergroup relations as perceived by the donor. With regard to group memberships and donor familiarity, we find that participants are more willing to help Asian victims after a 5 min quiz that improves their knowledge of an outgroup. With regard to donor–perpetrator and donor–victim relationships, we find that both perpetrator and victim categories can be manipulated in order to engender a more prosocial response. Moreover, consideration of perpetrator roles, in addition to the more frequently studied role of the victim, can aid in eliciting a charitable response. Finally, with regard to intergroup relations as perceived by the donor, we find that Chinese participants are more willing to help Japanese tsunami victims if they have a positive image of Japan as a nation; however, this same positive image can also decrease donations if Japanese victims are seen to be highly competent. In sum, we demonstrate the importance of intergroup contexts in understanding donation behaviour and suggest that such contexts can be used to promote helping behaviour. We end with both suggestions for future work and a discussion of practical implications for fund raisers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Intentional harms are worse, even when they’re not. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1755–1762. doi:10.1177/0956797613480507.
Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2015). Perceived intent motivates people to magnify observed harms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(12), 3599–3605.
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organising framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.
Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology and Marketing, 23(12), 1035–1054. doi:10.1002/mar.
Batson, D. C., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290–302. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290.
Brewer, M. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307.
Brewer, M. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126.
Brown, R., González, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 75–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75.
Brown, R., Maras, P., Masser, B., Vivian, J., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Life on the ocean wave: Testing some intergroup hypotheses in a naturalistic setting. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(2), 81–97.
Charities Aid Foundation. (2006). International comparisons of charitable giving. CAF Briefing Paper. West Malling, Kent. Retrieved from https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-publications/international-comparisons-of-charitable-giving.pdf
Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, C. L., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the Empathy-Altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481–494.
Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. R. (2011). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 149–153.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Empathic concern and the muscular dystrophy telethon: Empathy as a multidimensional construct. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(2), 223–229. doi:10.1177/0146167283092005.
Dobbs, J., Harrison, R., Jochum, V., Smith, M., & Wilding, K. (2012). UK Giving 2012. West Malling, Kent: Charitable Aids Foundation & National Council for Voluntary Organisations.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: when one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 872–886.
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3562705.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Nier, J. A., Ward, C. M., & Banker, B. S. (1999). Across cultural divides: The value of a superordinate identity. In D. A. Prentice, D. T. Miller, D. A. Prentice, & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 173–212). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
González, R., & Lay, S. (2017). Sense of responsibility and empathy: Bridging the gap between attributions and helping behaviours. In E. van Leeuwen & H. Zagefka (Eds.), Intergroup helping. New York, NY: Springer.
Harvey, R. R. D., & Oswald, D. D. (2000). Collective guilt and shame as motivation for white support of black programs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(9), 1790–1811. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02468.x.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109.
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x.
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269.
James, T. K. (2015). The social psychology of charitable giving: Determinants of individual donation decisions in intergroup contexts. Egham: Royal Holloway, University of London.
James, T. K., & Zagefka, H. (2017). The effects of group memberships of victims and perpetrators in humanly caused disasters on charitable donations to victims. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lagnado, D. A., & Channon, S. (2008). Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition, 108(3), 754–770. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.009.
Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., et al. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165.
Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443–453.
Levine, M., & Thompson, K. (2004). Identity, place, and bystander intervention: Social categories and helping after natural disasters. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(3), 229–245. doi:10.3200/SOCP.144.3.229-245.
Nadler, A. (2002). Inter-Group Helping Relations as power relations: Maintaining or challenging social dominance between groups through helping. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 487–502.
Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 557–570. doi:10.1037/a0022885.
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N., & Eidelson, R. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280–306.
Rutland, A., Hitti, A., Mulvey, K. L., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2015). When does the in-group like the out-group? Bias among children as a function of group norms. Psychological Science., 26, 834–842. doi:10.1177/0956797615572758.
Shaojing, S., Zagefka, H., & Goodwin, R. (2013). Predictors of intergroup concern for disaster victims of the Japan Earthquake. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 152–157.
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sierksma, J., & Thijs, J. (2017). Intergroup helping: How do children see it? In E. van Leeuwen & H. Zagefka (Eds.), Intergroup helping. New York, NY: Springer.
Simon, B., Stürmer, S., & Steffens, K. (2000). Helping individuals or group members? The role of individual and collective identification in AIDS volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 497–506.
Staub, E. (1999). The origins and prevention of genocide, mass killing, and other collective violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 5(4), 303–336.
Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B. (2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943–956. doi:10.1177/0146167206287363.
Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2005). Prosocial emotions and helping: the moderating role of group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 532–546.
Swann Jr., W. B., Gómez, Á., Seyle, D. C., Morales, J. F., & Huici, C. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011. doi:10.1037/a0013668.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: a self-categoristation theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2015). The challenges we face today: World humanitarian data and trends, 2015. Retrieved from https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/WHDT2015_2Dec.pdf
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2016). Plan and budget 2016. Retrieved from https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/OCHAin2016.pdf
Urschler, D., & James, T. K. (2017). The international bystander effect: Bystander intervention in the context of disaster aid. Manuscript in preparation.
van Leeuwen, E. (2007). Restoring identity through outgroup helping: Beliefs about international aid in response to the December 2004 tsunami. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 661–671.
van Leeuwen, E., van Dijk, W., & Kaynak, U. (2013). Of saints and sinners: How appeals to collective pride and guilt affect outgroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(6), 781–796. doi:10.1177/1368430213485995.
Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 288–303. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288.
Zagefka, H., Noor, M., Brown, R., Hopthrow, T., & Randsley de Moura, G. (2012a). Eliciting donations to disaster victims: Psychological considerations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 221–230.
Zagefka, H., Noor, M., & Brown, R. J. (2012b). Familiarity breeds compassion: knowledge of disaster areas and willingness to donate to the disaster victims. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 62, 640–654.
Zagefka, H., Noor, M., Randsley de Moura, G., Hopthrow, T., & Brown, R. (2011). Donating to disaster victims: Responses to natural and humanly caused events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 353–363.
Zebel, S., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2009). How perspective-taking helps and hinders group-based guilt as a function of group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(1), 61–78. doi:10.1177/1368430208098777.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
James, T.K., Zagefka, H. (2017). The Importance of National Identities and Intergroup Relations in Disaster Aid. In: van Leeuwen, E., Zagefka, H. (eds) Intergroup Helping. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53026-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53026-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53024-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53026-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)