Advertisement

§ 6 General Remarks on the Non-Contractual Liability Regime Arising Out of Damage Caused to Another in the Draft Common Frame of Reference (PEL. Liab. Dam.)

Chapter
  • 238 Downloads

Abstract

The first academic initiatives aiming at comparing and harmonising European Private Law arose in the field of Contract Law. However, attention soon shifted to other areas of Private Law, such as non-contractual liability arising out of damage caused to another.

Bibliography

  1. Almeida Costa MJ (2006a) Direito das Obrigações, 10th edn. Almedina, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoniolli L, Fiorentini F (2011) Introduction. In: Antoniolli L, Fiorentini F (eds) A factual assessment of the DCFR. Sellier, Munich, pp 1–49Google Scholar
  3. Antunes Varela J (2000) Das obrigações em geral, vol 1, 10th edn. Almedina, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  4. Banakas S (2002) European tort law: is it possible? ERPL 10(3):363–375Google Scholar
  5. Blackie J (2005) Tort/Delict in the work of the European Civil Code project of the study group on a European civil code. In: Zimmermann R (ed) Grundstrukturen eines Europäischen Bereicherungsrechts. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 133–146Google Scholar
  6. Blackie J (2007) The torts provisions of the Study Group on a European Civil Code. In: Bussani M (ed) European tort law. Eastern and western perspectives, European private law 5. Stämpfli, Bern, pp 55–80Google Scholar
  7. Brandão Proença JC (1997) A conduta do lesado como pressuposto e critério de imputação do dano extracontratual. Almedina, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  8. Brüggemeier G (1999) Prinzipien des Haftungsrechts. Eine systematische Darstellung auf rechtsvergleichender Grundlage. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  9. Brüggemeier G (2004) Common principles of tort law. A pre-statement of law. The British Institute of International and Comparative Law, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Brüggemeier G (2009a) Non-contractual liability arising out of damage caused to another: the making of a hybrid. In: Somma A (ed) The politics of the draft common frame of reference, pp 179–198. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  11. Brüggemeier G (2009b) Protection of personality rights in the law of delict/torts in Europe: mapping out paradigms. In: Brüggemeier G, Colombi Ciacchi A, O’Callaghan P (eds) Personality rights in European tort law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Brüggemeier G, Yan Z (2009) Entwurf für ein chinesisches Haftungsgesetz. Text und Begründung. Ein Beitrag zur internationalen Diskussion um die Reform des Haftungsrechts. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  13. Colombi Ciacchi A (2009) Alte und neue Paradigmen in der Fahrlässigleitshaftung. In: Colombi Ciacchi A, Godt C, Rott P, Smith LJ (eds) Haftungsrecht im dritten Millenium. Liber Amicorum Gert Brüggemeier. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  14. European Group on Tort Law (2005) Principles of European Tort law: text and commentary. Springer, Vienna/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Faure M, Schneider H, Smits J (2002) Towards a European ius commune in legal education and research. Intersentia, AntwerpenGoogle Scholar
  16. Galvão Telles I (1997) Direito das Obrigações, 7th edn. Coimbra Editora, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  17. Hondius E (2007) Towards a European tort law. In: Bussani M (ed) European tort law: eastern and western perspectives, European private law 5. Stämpfli, Bern, pp 47–54Google Scholar
  18. Howarth D (2011) The general conditions of unlawfulness. In: Hartkamp A, Hesselink MW, Hondius EH, Mak C, du Perron CE (eds) Towards a European civil code, 4th edn. Kluwer Law International/Ars Aequi Libri, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 845–887Google Scholar
  19. Infantino M (2009) Making European tort law: the game and its players. CJICL 20(1):45–87Google Scholar
  20. Jansen N (2001) Auf dem Weg zu einem europäischen Haftungsrecht. ZEup 9:30–65Google Scholar
  21. Jansen N (2006) Principles of European tort law? Grundwertungen und Systembildung im europäischen Haftungsrecht. RabelsZ 70(1):732–770Google Scholar
  22. Kellner M (2009) Tort law of the European community: a plea for an overarching pan-European framework. ERPL 17(2):133–154Google Scholar
  23. Koch BA (2005) The “European Group on Tort Law” and its “Principles of European Tort Law”. AJCL 53(1):189–205. Available via JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038691. Accessed 31 Mar 2017
  24. Koziol H (2008) Conclusion. In: Koziol H, Schulze R (eds) Tort law of the European community. Springer, Vienna/New York, pp 589–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Legrand P (2006) Antivonbar. JCL 13(1):13–40Google Scholar
  26. Lukas M (2008) Fault liability. In: Koziol H, Schulze R (eds) Tort law of the European community. Springer, Vienna/New York, pp 81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magnus U (2002) Towards European civil liability. In: Faure M, Schneider H, Smits J (eds) Towards a European ius commune in legal education and research. Intersentia, Antwerpen/Gröningen, pp 205–224Google Scholar
  28. Magnus U (2004a) Ein einheitliches Deliktsrecht für Europe? In: Kieninger E-M, Remien O (eds) Privat- und Wirtschaftsrecht im Zeichen der Europäischen Integration. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 141–162Google Scholar
  29. Magnus U (2004b) Vergleich der Vorschläge zum europäischen Deliktsrecht. ZEuP (3):562–580Google Scholar
  30. Martín-Casals M (2005) Una primera aproximación a los Principios de Derecho Europeo de la Responsabilidad Civil. InDret 284:1–25Google Scholar
  31. Menezes Cordeiro A (2010b) Tratado de Direito Civil Português, vol II-Direito das Obrigações. Tomo 3- Gestão de negócios, enriquecimento sem causa, responsabilidade civil. Almedina, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  32. Menezes Leitão A (2009) Normas de protecção e danos puramente patrimoniais. Almedina, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  33. Miranda Barbosa AM (2006a) Liberdade vs. responsabilidade: a precaução como fundamento da imputação delitual? Almedina, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  34. Miranda Barbosa M (2015) Responsabilidade Civil: Um diálogo a propósito da ilicitude e da causalidade adequada entre o sistema português e a tentativa de harmonização do direito delitual ao nível Europeu. TI 33(1):218–264Google Scholar
  35. Moura Vicente D (2008) Direito Comparado, vol I-Introdução e parte geral. Almedina, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliphant K (2011) Volume 4 (Book VI, Non-contractual liability arising out of damage caused to another). Edinburgh Law Rev 16(1):309–311Google Scholar
  37. Opoku K (1972) Delictual liability in German law. ICLQ 21(2):230–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pereira Coelho FM (1955) O problema da causa virtual na responsabilidade civil. Coimbra Editora, CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  39. Ranieri F (2003) Europäisches Obligationenrecht. Springer, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers WVH, Bagińska E (eds) (2001) Damages for non-pecuniary loss in a comparative perspective, tort and insurance law, vol 2. Springer, Vienna/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt-Kessel M (2006) Reform des Schadensersatzrechts, vol I - Europäische Vorgaben und Vorbilder. Manz, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  42. Schulze R (2011) Contours of European private law. In: Schulze R, Schulte-Nölke H (eds) European private law - Current status and perspectives. Sellier, Munich, pp 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schulze R (2012) Non-contractual liability arising out of damage caused to another in the DCFR. In: Sagaert V, Storme M, Terryn E (eds) The Draft Common Frame of Reference: national and comparative perspectives. Intersentia, Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland, pp 221–230Google Scholar
  44. Sinde Monteiro JF (2002) Manuel de Andrade, a “Europeização” do Direito Privado e o desafio de um código civil Europeu. Separata da obra Ciclo de Conferências em Homenagem Póstuma ao Prof. Doutor Manuel de Andrade. Almedina, Coimbra, pp 43–53Google Scholar
  45. Spier J (2005) The Principles of European Tort Law of the European Group on Tort Law. In: European Group on Tort Law (eds) Principles of European Tort Law: text and commentary. Springer, Vienna/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Swann S (2003) Conceptual foundations of the law of delict as proposed by the Study Group on a European Civil Code. InDret 130:1–31Google Scholar
  47. van Dam C (2013) European tort law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. van Gerven W, Lever J, Larouche P (2000) Tort law. Hart, Oxford/Portland OregonGoogle Scholar
  49. von Bar C (1986) Zur Bedeutung des beweglichen Systems für die Dogmatik der Verkehrspflichten. In: Bydlinski F, Krejci H, Schilcher B, Steininger V (eds) Das bewegliche System im geltenden und künftigen Recht. Springer, Vienna/New York, pp 63–74Google Scholar
  50. von Bar C (1992b) Neues Haftungsrecht durch Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht. Die Verschuldens- und die Gefährdungshaftung des deutschen Rechts und das haftungsrechtliche Richtlinienrecht der EG. In: Medicus D, Mertens H-J, Nörr K W, Zöllner W (eds) Festschrift für Hermann Lange zum 70. Geburtstag am 24. Januar 1992. W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart/Berlin/Cologne, pp 373–395Google Scholar
  51. von Bar C (1994c) Vereinheitlichung und Angleichung von Deliktsrecht in der Europäischen Union. ZfRV:221–232Google Scholar
  52. von Bar C (ed) (1994d) Deliktsrecht in Europa: Systematische Einführungen, Gesetztexte, Übersetzungen. Carl Heymanns, Cologne/Berlin/Bonn/MunichGoogle Scholar
  53. von Bar C (1996a) A common European law of torts. Centro di Studi e Ricerche di Diritto Comparato e Straniero, RomeGoogle Scholar
  54. von Bar C (1996b) Gemeineuropäisches Deliktsrecht, vol I-Kernbereiche des Deliktsrechts, seine Angleichung in Europa und seine Einbettung in die Gesamtrechtsordnung (English transl. Common European Law of Torts 1). Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  55. von Bar C (1998a) The common European law of torts, vol I-The core areas of tort law, its approximation in Europe, and its accommodation in the legal system. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. von Bar C (1998d) Vicarious liability. In: Hartkamp A (ed) Towards a European civil code. Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London/Boston, pp 431–447Google Scholar
  57. von Bar C (1999a) Außervertragliche Schuldverhältnisse, insbesondere Haftungsrecht. In: von Bar C, Barendrecht M, Basedow J, Drobnig U, van Gerven W, Hondius E, Kerameus K, Koussoulis S, Lando O, Loos M, Tilmann W (eds) (1999) Untersuchung der Privatrechtsordnungen der EU im Hinblick auf Diskriminierungen und die Schaffung eines europäisches Zivilgesetzbuches. Europäisches Parlament, Luxembourg. Available via the European Parliament website. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/1999/168511/IPOL-JURI_ET%281999%29168511_DE.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2017Google Scholar
  58. von Bar C (1999b) Damage without loss. In: Swadling W, Jones G (eds) The search for principle. Essays in honour of Lord Goff of Chieveley. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 23–43Google Scholar
  59. von Bar C (1999e) Gemeineuropäisches Deliktsrecht, vol II-Schaden und Schadenersatz, Haftung für und ohne eigenes Fehlverhalten, Kausalität und Verteidigungsgründe (English transl.: Common European Law of Torts 2). Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  60. von Bar C (1999f) Non-contractual obligations, especially the law of tort. In: Offermann KH (ed) The private law systems in the EU. Discrimination on grounds of nationality and the need for a European Civil Code. European Parliament, Luxembourg, pp 41–55Google Scholar
  61. von Bar C (2000a) The common European law of torts, vol II-Damage and damages, liability for and without personal misconduct, causality, and defences. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  62. von Bar C (2001a) Konturen des Deliktsrechtskonzeptes der Study Group on a European Civil Code. Ein Werkstattbericht. ZEuP (9):515–532Google Scholar
  63. von Bar C (2002a) Auf dem Wege zu Europäischen Grundregeln der außervertraglichen Schadenshaftung. In: Schlechtriem P (ed) Wandlungen des Schuldrechts, pp 165–178. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  64. von Bar C (2008c) Non-contractual liability arising out of damage caused to another under the DCFR. ERA Forum 9(1):33–38Google Scholar
  65. von Bar C (ed) (2009c) Principles of European law on non-contractual liability arising out of damage caused to another. PEL Liab. Dam. Sellier, MunichGoogle Scholar
  66. von Bar C (2010a) Außervertragliche Haftung für den Einem Anderen Zugefügten Schaden. Das Buch VI des Draft Common Frame of Reference. Eur Rev Priv Law 18(2):205–225Google Scholar
  67. von Bar C (2011b) The notion of damage. In: Hartkamp AS, Hesselink MW, Hondius EH, Mak C, du Perron CE (eds) Towards a European civil code, 4th edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 387–399Google Scholar
  68. von Bar C (2011d) Rechtsvergleichende Beobachtungen zum Ineinandergreifen von Vertrags- und Deliktsrecht in Europa. In: Schulze R (ed) Compensation of private losses. The evolution of torts in European business law. Sellier, Munich, pp 201–212Google Scholar
  69. von Bar C (2011e) Statements on perspectives for European private law: as much diversity as possible, as less uniformity as necessary? In: Schulze R, Schulte-Nölke H (eds) European private law. Sellier, Munich, pp 265–267Google Scholar
  70. von Bar C, Clive E, Schulte-Nölke H (eds) (2009) Principles, definitions and model rules of European private law. Draft Common Frame of Reference - Outline Edition. Sellier, MunichGoogle Scholar
  71. von Bar C, Drobnig U (2004) The interaction of contract law and tort and property law in Europe. Sellier, MunichGoogle Scholar
  72. Wagner G (2009) The law of torts in the DCFR. In: Wagner G (ed) The Common Frame of Reference: a view from law & economics. Sellier, Munich, pp 225–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Widmer P (1999) Die Vereinheitlichung des europäischen Schadenersatzrechts aus der Sicht eines Kontinentaleuropäers. RHDI 52(1):87–102Google Scholar
  74. Wissink M (2008) Overview. In: Koziol H, Schulze R (eds) Tort law of the European Community. Springer, Vienna/New York, pp 341–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wurmnest W (2003a) Common Core, Grundregeln, Kodifikationsentwürfe, Acquis-Grundsätze - Ansätze internationaler Wissenschaftlergruppen zur Privatvereinheitlichung in Europa. ZEuP 11(1):714–744Google Scholar
  76. Wurmnest W (2003b) Grundzüge eines europäischen Haftungsrechts. Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung des Gemeinschaftsrechts. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  77. Zweigert K, Kötz H (1996) Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, 3rd edn. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations