Organizational Networks Revisited: Relational Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 661)


Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is an important management construct. Despite previous investigations in relation to social capital, the role of networks in its emergence has received only limited attention. In this paper we investigate the relationship between OCB, with data collected from supervisors evaluating their subordinates; sever-al types of organizational networks (professional, friendship, support, supervisor-subordinate), and several other constructs (collected from the employees themselves), shown to affect OCB in the past. All data were collected at a large insurance company in Russia.

Outcomes of this study have several important implications. First, the impact of networks on manifestation of OCB depends not only on the strength of network ties, but on types of network. Second, interoganizational relationships are complex and consist of several levels of mediated relationships. Results of this study can impact the theoretical understanding of OCB and have practical implications for the supervisor-subordinate relationships in the workplace.


Network relationships Organizational citizenship behavior Job characteristics 


  1. 1.
    Organ, D.W.: Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington Books, Lexingon (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Organ, D.W.: The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 12(1), 43–72 (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Podsako, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Pain, J.B., Bachrach, D.G.: Organizational citizenship behaviors: critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions future research. J. Manag. 26, 513–563 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Podsakoff, N.P., Whiting, S.W., Podsakoff, P.M., Blume, B.D.: Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(1), 122–141 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolino, M., Turnley, W.H.: Going the extra mile: cultivating and managing employee citizenship behavior. Acad. Manag. Executive 17, 61 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Podakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.W., Hui, C.: Organizational citizenship behaviors and managerial evaluations of employee performance: a review and suggestion. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 18, 1085–1097 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bommer, W., Miles, W., Graver, S.N.: Does one good turn deserve another? Coworker influence on employee citizenship. J. Organ. Behav. 24, 181–196 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deckop, J.R., Circa, C.C., Andersson, L.M.: Doing unto others: the reciprocity of helping behavior in organizations. J. Bus. Ethics 47, 101–113 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bowler, W.M., Brass, D.J.: Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: a social network perspective. J. Appl. Psychol. 91(1), 78–82 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bommer, W.H., Miles, W., Grover, S.L.: Does one good turn deserve another? Coworker influences on employee citizenship. J. Organ. Behav. 24, 181–196 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Emerson, R.M.: Social exchange theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2, 335–362 (1976)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brass, D.J., Buttereld, K.D., Skaggs, B.: Relationships and unethical behavior: a social networks perspectives. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 14–31 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Decop, J.R., Circa, C.C., Andersson, L.M.: Doing unto others: the reciprocity of helping behavior in organizations. J. Bus. Ethics 47, 101–113 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gibbons, D.: Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Adm. Sci. Q. 49, 238–262 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morrison, W.: Newcomer’s relationships: the role of social network ties during socialization. Acad. Manag. J. 45, 1149–1160 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cross, R., Prusak, L.: The peopel who make organizations go - or stop. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(6), 105–112 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brass, D.J., Burkhardt, M.: Potential power and power use: an investigation of structur and behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 36, 441–470 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burkhardt, M., Brass, D.J.: Changing patters or patterns of change: the effect of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 104–127 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zagenczyk, T.J., Murrell, J.: It is better to receive than to give: advice network effects on job and work-unit attachment. J. Bus. Psychol. 24(2), 139–152 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salanscik, G.R., Pfeffer, J.: A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Adm. Sci. Q. 23, 224–253 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krakhardt, D., Stern, R.N.: Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation. Soc. Psychol. Q. 51, 123–140 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kilduff, M.: The interpersonal structure of decision-making: a social comparison approach to organizational choice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 47, 270–288 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited (1982)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S.: Testing Structural Equation Models, vol. 154. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations