Advertisement

Muscle Force Estimation Model for Gait Rehabilitation

  • Ye Ma
  • Shane Xie
  • Yanxin Zhang
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter a patient-specific muscle force estimation model (PMFE) is proposed. Muscle forces calculated by the PMFE based on a patient’s musculoskeletal model serve as control inputs to control antagonistic air muscles. The PMFE is an anatomy-based inverse dynamic-static optimisation model aiming to fulfil the requirements for controlling a human-inspired rehabilitation robot via muscle forces. It is targeted at providing real-time force assistance during gait. The PMFE is based on a 2D computer-generated musculoskeletal model, which computes anatomical parameters and time-variable moment arms.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Seth, A., et al., OpenSim: A musculoskeletal modeling and simulation framework for in silico investigations and exchange. Procedia IUTAM, 2011. 2: p. 212–232.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delp, S.L., et al., An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1990. 37(8): p. 757–767.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erdemir, A., et al., Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2007. 22(2): p. 131–154.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blemker, S.S., et al., Image‐based musculoskeletal modeling: Applications, advances, and future opportunities. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2007. 25(2): p. 441–451.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McDaid, A.J., et al., Human-inspired robotic exoskeleton (HuREx) for lower limb rehabilitation, in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. 2013: Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perry, J., Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winter, D.A., H.G. Sidwall, and D.A. Hobson, Measurement and reduction of noise in kinematics of locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics, 1974. 7(2): p. 157–159.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garner, B.A. and M.G. Pandy, The obstacle-set method for representing muscle paths in musculoskeletal models. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 2000. 3(1): p. 1–30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gao, F., et al., Computational method for muscle-path representation in musculoskeletal models. Biological Cybernetics, 2002. 87(3): p. 199–210.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, M.Q., et al., Muscle contributions to support and progression over a range of walking speeds. Journal of Biomechanics, 2008. 41(15): p. 3243–3252.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alonso, J., et al., A simple approach to estimate muscle forces and orthosis actuation in powered assisted walking of spinal cord-injured subjects. Multibody System Dynamics, 2012. 28(1–2): p. 109–124.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heintz, S. and E.M. Gutierrez-Farewik, Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach. Gait & Posture, 2007. 26(2): p. 279–288.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thelen, D.G., F.C. Anderson, and S.L. Delp, Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. Journal of biomechanics, 2003. 36(3): p. 321–328.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thelen, D.G. and F.C. Anderson, Using computed muscle control to generate forward dynamic simulations of human walking from experimental data. Journal of Biomechanics, 2008. 39(6): p. 1107.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joseph Hamill, K.M.K., Biomechanical basis of human movement, ed. T. Edition. 2009.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zajac, F.E., R.R. Neptune, and S.A. Kautz, Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: Part II: Lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications. Gait & Posture, 2003. 17(1): p. 1–17.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGill, S.M., N. Patt, and R.W. Norman, Measurement of the trunk musculature of active males using CT scan radiography: Implications for force and moment generating capacity about the L4L5 joint. Journal of Biomechanics, 1988. 21(4): p. 329–341.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hill, A.V., The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 1938. 126(843): p. 136–195.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crowninshield, R.D. and R.A. Brand, A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics, 1981. 14(11): p. 793–801.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yamaguchi, G.T. and F.E. Zajac, Restoring unassisted natural gait to paraplegics via functional neuromuscular stimulation: A computer simulation study. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1990. 37(9): p. 886–902.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson, F.C. and M.G. Pandy, Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. Journal of Biomechanics, 2001. 34(2): p. 153–161.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kordasz, M., et al., Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Flexible-Joint Manipulator, in Robot Motion and Control 2011, K. Kozłowski, Editor. 2012, Springer London. p. 247–258.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hogan, N., Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part II-Implementation. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1985. 107(1): p. 8–18.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kora, K., A. McDaid, and S. Xie. Non-linear model-based control for the Human-inspired Robotic Exoskeleton (HuREx) gait trainer. in World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control, Cape Town, South Africa. 2014.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beyl, P., et al., Safe and compliant guidance by a powered knee exoskeleton for robot-assisted rehabilitation of gait. Advanced Robotics, 2011. 25(5): p. 513–535.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kong, K., et al. Mechanical design and impedance compensation of SUBAR (Sogang University’s Biomedical Assist Robot). in IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, August 2–5, 2008. Xi’an, China: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Veerbeek, J.M., et al., What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 2014. 9(2): p. e87987.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patton, J.L., M. Kovic, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Custom-designed haptic training for restoring reaching ability to individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2008. 43(5): p. 643–658.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Umphred, D.A., et al., Neurological rehabilitation. 2013: Elsevier Health Sciences.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of LeedsLeedsUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  4. 4.Ningbo UniversityNingboChina

Personalised recommendations