Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mary Parker Follett: Change in the Paradigm of Integration

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers

  • 5547 Accesses

Abstract

The work of Mary Parker Follett, an intellectual pioneer of the early twentieth century, resists categorization or assignment to any one category or field of study. A political and management theorist, Follett proposed a renewed vision of participative democracy as she anticipated the future practice of conflict mediation and of management as a profession.

Follett’s work, rooted in her integrative philosophy of addressing conflict and problems, is particularly and perennially relevant to managing change. The following chapter first presents the profound influences of Follett’s academic, personal, and professional experiences in shaping her perspectives. We then delve into what we view as Follett’s most important, enduring contributions to management study and practice – integration and circular response – as a paradigm for managing change. We highlight different contexts in which Follett has translated her integrative philosophy into practical concepts, such as power-with management, the law of the situation, the invisible leader and the common purpose, and circular behavior as the basis of integration. We will conclude this collective reflection by illustrating how Follett’s legacy is unfinished; her ideas endure and are relevant even today in governing our period of complexity and interdependent challenges. Follett still shows the way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bion, W. R. (1957). The differentiation of the psychotic from the non-psychotic personalities. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 38, 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M., & Rosile, G. A. (2001). Where’s the power in empowerment? Answers from Follett and Clegg. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 37(1), 90–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. S. (1925). The work and aims of the Taylor Society. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 119, 134–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1995). Commentary on Follett: Constructive conflict. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s (pp. 87–95). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2015). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 129–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (1999). Appreciative inquiry. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandelion, P. (2007). An introduction to Quakerism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. M. (2015). When Webb Met Follett: Negotiation theory and the race to the moon. Negotiation Journal, 31(3), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1995). Introduction, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of management. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s (pp. 1–9). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eylon, D. (1998). Understanding empowerment and resolving its paradox: Lessons from Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Management History, 4(1), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldheim, M. A. (2004). Mary Parker Follett: Lost and found – again, and again, and again. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 7(3), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: The secret to successful negotiation (1st ed.). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: The secret to successful negotiation. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1896). The speaker of the House of Representatives. New York: Longmans, Green, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1918). The new state: Group organisation, the solution for popular government. New York: Longmans, Green, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1919). Community is a process. Philosophical Review, XXVIII, 576–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. New York: Longmans, Green, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1941). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. In H. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.). London: Pitman & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. M., & Urwick, L. F. (Eds.). (1949). Freedom and coordination. London: Management Publications Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. M., & Urwick, L. F. (Eds.). (1973). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, B. R., & Thomas, L. L. (1996). Mary Parker Follett: Assessing the contribution and impact of her writings. Journal of Management History, 2(2), 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, S., Launius, R. (2005). A brief history of NASA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved 17 Nov 2016, from http://history.nasa.gov/factsheet.htm

  • Gergen, K. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer. 1982. Second Edition, London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. (Ed.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héon, F., Davis, A., Jones-Patulli, J., & Damart, S. (2014). Mary Parker Follett: Ideas we need today. Montreal: Self-published.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1895). The knowing of things together. Psychological Review, 2(2), 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1995). Preface. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s (pp. xiii–xxix). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1966). Management education: Its data, efficiency, and first principles. Management International Review, 6(5), 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, R., & Thomas, K. W. (1977). Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict handling behavior: The MODE instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(2), 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A., & Lipsky, D. B. (2003). Conceptual foundations: Walton and McKersie’s subprocesses of negotiations [electronic version]. In T. A. Kochan & D. B. Lipsky (Eds.), Negotiations and change: From the workplace to society (pp. 15–19). Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (2014). Foundational scholars of experiential learning [PowerPoint slides]. Presented at The Power of Words, the 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R. (1995). Epilogue. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s (pp. 291–296). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLarney, C., & Rhyno, S. (1998). Mary Parker Follett: Visionary leadership and strategic management. Women in. Management Review, 14(7), 292–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuaid, K. (1977). Henry S. Dennison and the “science” of industrial reform, 1900–1950. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 36(1), 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall, M. E., Macomber, J. H., & Cutright, M. (2000). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of chaos and complexity. Journal of Management History, 6, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, H. C., & Urwick, L. (Eds.). (1941). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E. S. (2011). Creating new knowledge in management: Appropriating the field’s lost foundations. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D., & Ritson, P. (2005). Fads, stereotypes and management gurus: Fayol and Follett today. Management Decision, 43(10), 1335–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, T. (1896). Review of the book The Speaker of the House of Representatives, by M. P. Follett. American Historical Review, 2(1), 176–178. doi:10.2307/1833641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebenius, J. K. (2013). What Roger Fisher got profoundly right: Five enduring lessons for negotiators. Negotiation Journal, 29(2), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms, M. (2009). Insights from a management prophet: Mary Parker Follett on social entrepreneurship. Business and Society Review, 114(3), 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoshikj, M. (2014). Integrative and distributive negotiations and negotiation behavior. Journal of Service Science Research, 6, 29–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, M., & Love, J. (2015). Integrative process: Follettian thinking from ontology to administration (toward ecological civilization). Anoka, MN: Process Century Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, M., & Staton, C. M. (2011). The ontology of process philosophy in Follett’s administrative theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(2), 268–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, M., Love, J., & Patalon, M. (2015). Integrative process: Follettian thinking from ontology to administration. Anoka: Process Century Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911/2009). The principles of scientific management. Ithaca: Cornell University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • The fifty best books of 1896. (1897, June 5). New York Times (1857–1922). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.sju.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.sju.edu/docview/95472951?accountid=14071

  • Tonn, J. (2003). Mary P. Follett: Creating democracy, transforming management. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trahair, R. C. S. (1984). Elton Mayo: The humanist temper. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urwick, L. (1935). The problem of organization: A study of the work of Mary Parker Follett. Bulletin of the Taylor Society and of the Society of Industrial Engineers as Members of Federated Management Societies, 1(5), 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. E. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, M. R. (1992). Discovering common ground. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelock, L. D., & Callahan, J. L. (2006). Mary Parker Follett: A rediscovered voice informing the field of human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 5(2), 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Damart, S. (2013). How Mary P. Follett’s ideas on management have emerged: An analysis based on her practical management experience and her political philosophy. Journal of Management History, 19(4).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. (Ed.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett, prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héon, F., Davis, A., Jones-Patulli, J., & Damart, S. (2014). Mary Parker Follett: Ideas we need today. Montreal: Self-published.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, M., & Love, J. (2015). Integrative process: Follettian thinking from ontology to administration (toward ecological civilization). Anoka, MN: Process Century Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, M., & Staton, C. M. (2011). The ontology of process philosophy in Follett’s administrative theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(2), 268–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, J. C. (2003). Mary P. Follett: Creating democracy, transforming management. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. François Héon Consulting, Montréal, QC, Canada

    François Héon

  2. CNRS, UMR 7088, DRM, M-LAB, Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, 75016, Paris, France

    Sébastien Damart

  3. Department of Management, Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Lisa A. T. Nelson

Authors
  1. François Héon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sébastien Damart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lisa A. T. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Héon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education and Human Development, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

    David B. Szabla

  2. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    William A. Pasmore

  3. The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

    Mary A. Barnes

  4. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Asha N. Gipson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Héon, F., Damart, S., Nelson, L.A.T. (2017). Mary Parker Follett: Change in the Paradigm of Integration. In: Szabla, D.B., Pasmore, W.A., Barnes, M.A., Gipson, A.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52878-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation