Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Advanced Laparoscopic Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Aspects of Peritoneal Dialysis

  • 812 Accesses

Abstract

The incidence of chronic kidney disease continues to rise while the utilization of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a mode of renal replacement therapy continues to decline. In response to decreased enthusiasm in PD, best-demonstrated practices for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement was published in 2006. Since that time, the long-term durability of PD at our institution has increased significantly. In this chapter, we describe the indications for laparoscopic PD catheter placement, our surgical technique, common pitfalls with PD catheter function, and our outcomes with this surgical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kidney Disease Statistics for the United States. http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/Pages/kidney-disease-statistics-united-states.aspx. Published June 2012. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.

  2. Chauhary K, Sangha H, Khanna R. Peritoneal dialysis first: rationale. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:447–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain AK, Blake P, Cordy P, Garg AX. Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:533–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Crabtree JH. Selected best demonstrated practices in pertioneal dialysis access. Kidney Int. 2006;70:S27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crabtree JH. Implantation techniques for peritoneal dialysis catheters: an instructional program for healthcare providers. Viewed April 20, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ. Effect of prior abdominal surgery, peritonitis, and adhesions on catheter function and long-term outcome on peritoneal dialysis. Am Surg. 2009;75(2):140–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keshavri A, Fazeli MS, Meyasmie A, et al. The effects of previous abdominal operations and intraperitoneal adhesions on the outcomes of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Perit Dial Int. 2010;30(1):41–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swarnalatha G, Rapur R, Pai S, Dakshinamurty KV. Strangulated umbilical hernia in a peritoneal dialysis patient. Indian J Nephrol. 2012;22(5):381–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Imvrios G, Tsakris D, Gakis D, Takoudas D, et al. Prosthetic mesh repair of multiple recurrent and large abdominal hernias in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 1994;14:338–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lye WC, Kour NW, van der Straaten JC, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of the Swan neck, coiled, and straight Tenckhoff catheters in patients on CAPD. Perit Dial Int. 1996;16:S333–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eklund BH, Honkanen EO, Kala AR, et al. Peritoneal dialysis access: prospective randomized comparison of the Swan neck and Tenckhoff catheters. Perit Dial Int. 1995;15(8):353–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eklund BH, Honkanen EO, Kala AR, et al. Catheter configuration and outcome in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a prospective comparison of two catheters. Perit Dial Int. 1994;14(1):70–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moncrief JW, Popovich RP, Broadrick JL, He ZZ, et al. The Moncrief-Popovich catheter. A new peritoneal access technique for patients on peritoneal dialysis. ASAIO J. 1993;39(1):62–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moncrief JW, Popovich RP, Dasgusta M, Costeron JW, et al. Reduction in peritonitis incidence in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with a new catheter and implantation technique. Perit Dial Int. 1993;13:S329–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elhassan E, McNair B, Quinn M, Teitelbaum I. Prolonged duration of peritoneal dialysis catheter embedment does not lower the catheter success rate. Perit Dial Int. 2011;31(5):558–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Han DC, Cha HK, So IN, Chung SH, et al. Subcutaneously implanted catheters reduce the incidence of peritonitis during CAPD by eliminating infection by periluminal route. Adv Perit Dial. 1992;8:298–301.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davies SJ, Phillips L, Griffiths AM, Lesley H, et al. What really happens to people on long-term peritoneal dialysis? Kidney Int. 1998;54(6):2207–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Han SH, Lee JE, Kim DK, Moon SJ, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients: single experience from Korea. Perit Dial Int. 2008;28:S21–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M, Morrison HI, et al. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;30(3):334–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coles GA, Williams JD. What is the place of peritoneal dialysis in the integrated treatment of renal failure? Kidney Int. 1998;54(6):2234–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heaf J. Underutilization of peritoneal dialysis. JAMA. 2004;291:740–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Attaluri V, Lebeis C, Brethauer S, et al. Advanced laparoscopic techniques significantly improve function of peritoneal dialysis catheters. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(16):699–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(1):112–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    Ivy N. Haskins MD & Steven Rosenblatt MD, FACS

Authors
  1. Ivy N. Haskins MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven Rosenblatt MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Rosenblatt MD, FACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

    Stephen Haggerty

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haskins, I.N., Rosenblatt, S. (2017). Advanced Laparoscopic Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters. In: Haggerty, S. (eds) Surgical Aspects of Peritoneal Dialysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52821-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52821-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52820-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52821-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation