Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Comparative Territorial Politics ((COMPTPOL))

  • 439 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter tackles the question: how engaged with political democracy are the citizens of the UK? Drawing on a survey designed for this research project, the chapter explores intention to vote, political action undertaken by individuals, satisfaction with democracy, sources of political information and broader political understanding. The chapter reveals a general openness to further debate about how the UK is governed and highlights interesting social differentiations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tom Devine, Independence or Union (London: Allen Lane, 2016), pp. 242–245 (Devine 2016).

  2. 2.

    Tak Wing Chan and Matthew Clayton, ‘Should the Voting Age be Lowered to Sixteen? Normative and Empirical Considerations’, Political Studies, 54:3 (2006), pp. 533–558 (Chan and Clayton 2006).

  3. 3.

    Bernard Crick, ‘The Presuppositions of Citizenship Education’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33:3 (1999), pp. 337–352 (Crick 1999).

  4. 4.

    John Curtice, ‘Has the Referendum Campaign Made a Difference?’, What Scotland Thinks (2014), at http://www.scotcen.org.uk/media/563071/ssa-2014-has-the-referendun-campaign-made-a-difference.pdf (accessed 31 October 2016) (Curtice 2014).

  5. 5.

    Lord Ashcroft, ‘EU Referendum: “How Did You Vote” Poll’, 2016, at http://lordashcroftpolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/How-the-UK-voted-Full-tables-1.pdf, calculated from table 64 (accessed 31 October 2016) (Ashcroft 2016).

  6. 6.

    Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963) (Almond and Verba 1963).

  7. 7.

    Almond and Verba, Civic Culture, p. 3.

  8. 8.

    Ronald Inglehart and Christian Welzel, Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005) (Inglehart and Welzel 2005); Max Kaase and Alan Marsh, ‘Political Action Repertory: Changes Over Time and a New Typology’, in Samuel Barnes and Max Kaase (eds.), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979) (Kaase and Marsh 1979); Hans-Dieter Klingemann, ‘Dissatisfied Democrats: Democratic Maturation in Old and New Democracies’, in Russell Dalton and Christian Welzel (eds.), The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) (Klingemann 2013).

  9. 9.

    The question was: ‘Please think of a scale that runs from 0 to 10, where 0 means very unlikely and 10 means very likely, how likely is it that you will vote in the 2015 general election?’ Those not eligible to vote were defined to be people who, in answer to the question ‘are you eligible to vote in this election’, chose one of the options: ‘No, because I am a citizen of another country and am not allowed to vote’, ‘No, because I am not 18 years old at the time of the election’, or ‘No, for another reason’. People who chose the option ‘No, because I have not registered to vote’ are defined here to be eligible to vote, because registration remained open until 20 April, more than two months after our fieldwork. See Electoral Commission, The May 2015 UK Elections (London: Electoral Commission 2015), p. 34 (Electoral Commission 2015).

  10. 10.

    Electoral Commission, May 2015, p. 3.

  11. 11.

    The question wording was: ‘On the whole are you very satisfied, rather satisfied, rather dissatisfied or very dissatisfied satisfied with the way democracy is developing in Britain?’, and there was a 5-point response scale from ‘very satisfied’ to ‘very dissatisfied’.

  12. 12.

    It should be noted, however, that turnout in the UK’s EU referendum on 23 June 2016 was lower in Scotland (at 67.2%) than in the UK as a whole (at 72.2%).

  13. 13.

    The question was: ‘How much difference do you think changes in how the UK is governed will make to your own life?’.

References

  • Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft Lord, ‘EU Referendum: “How Did You Vote” Poll’, 2016, at http://lordashcroftpolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/How-the-UK-voted-Full-tables-1.pdf (accessed 31 October 2016).

  • Chan, Tak Wing, and Matthew Clayton, ‘Should the Voting Age be Lowered to Sixteen? Normative and Empirical Considerations,’ Political Studies 54:3 (2006): 533–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, Bernard, ‘The Presuppositions of Citizenship Education,’ Journal of Philosophy of Education 33:3 (1999): 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, John, ‘Has the Referendum Campaign Made a Difference?’. What Scotland Thinks (2014) at http://www.scotcen.org.uk/media/563071/ssa-2014-has-the-referendun-campaign-made-a-difference.pdf accessed 31 October 2016.

  • Devine, Tom, Independence or Union (London: Allen Lane, 2016), 242–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Electoral Commission, The May 2015 UK Elections (London: Electoral Commission, 2015), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel, Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaase, Max, and Alan Marsh, ‘Political Action Repertory: Changes Over Time and a New Typology,’ in Samuel Barnes and Max Kaase (eds.), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, ‘Dissatisfied Democrats: Democratic Maturation in Old and New Democracies,’ in Russell Dalton and Christian Welzel (eds.), The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2.A1 Sample sizes: Nation and age (eligible to vote only)
Table 2.A2 Sample sizes: Nation and highest educational attainment (eligible to vote only)
Table 2.A3 Sample sizes: Nation and national identity (eligible to vote only)
Table 2.A4 Sample sizes: Nation and sex
Table 2.A5 Sample sizes: Nation and age
Table 2.A6 Sample sizes: Nation and highest educational attainment
Table 2.A7 Sample sizes: Nation and national identity
Table 2.A8 Sample sizes: Selected religious groups in Northern Ireland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L., Remond, A. (2017). Political Engagement. In: Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK. Comparative Territorial Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics